Heuristics for SCC strength
Provides 3 heurisitics to compute the strength of an SCC: inherent, structural and syntactic * src/tgbaalgos/isweakscc.cc: implementation * src/tgbaalgos/isweakscc.hh: definition
This commit is contained in:
parent
b4fbbc9562
commit
450ec22bc3
2 changed files with 148 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,50 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// necessarily weak.
|
||||
/// For other accepting SCCs, this function enumerates all cycles in
|
||||
/// the given SCC (it stops if it find a non-accepting cycle).
|
||||
bool is_weak_scc(scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
bool is_weak_scc(scc_map& map, unsigned scc, bool easydetect = true);
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether the SCC number \a scc in \a map is complete
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// A SCC is complete iff for all states for all label there exist
|
||||
/// a transition that stay into this SCC.
|
||||
bool
|
||||
is_complete_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Whether the SCC number \a scc in \a map is syntactically weak.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// An SCC is syntactically weak iff the lowest label of states inside
|
||||
/// this SCC corresponds to an obligation label
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Work only on tgba where labels are formula
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The scc_map \a map should have been built already. The absence
|
||||
/// of accepting cycle is easy to check (the scc_map can tell
|
||||
/// whether the SCC is non-accepting already). Similarly, an SCC in
|
||||
/// which all transitions belong to all acceptance sets is
|
||||
/// necessarily weak.
|
||||
/// For other accepting SCCs, this function enumerates all cycles in
|
||||
/// the given SCC (it stops if it find a non-accepting cycle).
|
||||
bool is_syntactic_weak_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief wether a SCC is syntactically characterized by a gurarantee
|
||||
/// formula
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Work only on tgba where labels are formula
|
||||
bool is_syntactic_terminal_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief wether a SCC is terminal using an heuristic
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The heuristic try to characterize the SCC by loking if the SCC
|
||||
/// is complete and all cycle are fully accepting ( all transitions
|
||||
/// have all acceptance conditions)
|
||||
bool
|
||||
is_terminal_heuristic (const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief wether a SCC is weak using an heuristic
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The heuristic looks if all path are fully accepting
|
||||
bool
|
||||
is_weak_heuristic(scc_map& map, unsigned scc);
|
||||
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue