// Copyright (C) 2012 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement de // l'Epita (LRDE). // // This file is part of Spot, a model checking library. // // Spot is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it // under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by // the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or // (at your option) any later version. // // Spot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT // ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY // or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public // License for more details. // // You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License // along with this program. If not, see . #ifndef SPOT_TGBAALGOS_ISWEAKSCC_HH # define SPOT_TGBAALGOS_ISWEAKSCC_HH #include "scc.hh" namespace spot { /// \addtogroup tgba_misc /// @{ /// \brief Whether the SCC number \a scc in \a map is weak. /// /// An SCC is weak if either its cycles are all accepting, or they /// are all non-accepting. /// /// The scc_map \a map should have been built already. The absence /// of accepting cycle is easy to check (the scc_map can tell /// whether the SCC is non-accepting already). Similarly, an SCC in /// which all transitions belong to all acceptance sets is /// necessarily weak. /// For other accepting SCCs, this function enumerates all cycles in /// the given SCC (it stops if it find a non-accepting cycle). bool is_weak_scc(scc_map& map, unsigned scc, bool easydetect = true); /// \brief Whether the SCC number \a scc in \a map is complete /// /// A SCC is complete iff for all states for all label there exist /// a transition that stay into this SCC. bool is_complete_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc); /// \brief Whether the SCC number \a scc in \a map is syntactically weak. /// /// An SCC is syntactically weak iff the lowest label of states inside /// this SCC corresponds to an obligation label /// /// Work only on tgba where labels are formula /// /// The scc_map \a map should have been built already. The absence /// of accepting cycle is easy to check (the scc_map can tell /// whether the SCC is non-accepting already). Similarly, an SCC in /// which all transitions belong to all acceptance sets is /// necessarily weak. /// For other accepting SCCs, this function enumerates all cycles in /// the given SCC (it stops if it find a non-accepting cycle). bool is_syntactic_weak_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc); /// \brief wether a SCC is syntactically characterized by a gurarantee /// formula /// /// Work only on tgba where labels are formula bool is_syntactic_terminal_scc(const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc); /// \brief wether a SCC is terminal using an heuristic /// /// The heuristic try to characterize the SCC by loking if the SCC /// is complete and all cycle are fully accepting ( all transitions /// have all acceptance conditions) bool is_terminal_heuristic (const tgba *a, scc_map& map, unsigned scc); /// \brief wether a SCC is weak using an heuristic /// /// The heuristic looks if all path are fully accepting bool is_weak_heuristic(scc_map& map, unsigned scc); /// @} } #endif // SPOT_TGBAALGOS_ISWEAKSCC_HH