// -*- coding: utf-8 -*- // Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Laboratoire de // Recherche et Développement de l'Epita (LRDE). // Copyright (C) 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Laboratoire d'Informatique de // Paris 6 (LIP6), département Systèmes Répartis Coopératifs (SRC), // Université Pierre et Marie Curie. // // This file is part of Spot, a model checking library. // // Spot is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it // under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by // the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or // (at your option) any later version. // // Spot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT // ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY // or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public // License for more details. // // You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License // along with this program. If not, see . #pragma once #include "ltlast/formula.hh" #include "twa/twagraph.hh" #include "ltlvisit/apcollect.hh" #include "ltlvisit/simplify.hh" namespace spot { /// \ingroup twa_ltl /// \brief Build a spot::twa_graph_ptr from an LTL formula. /// /// This is based on the following paper. /** \verbatim @InProceedings{couvreur.99.fm, author = {Jean-Michel Couvreur}, title = {On-the-fly Verification of Temporal Logic}, pages = {253--271}, editor = {Jeannette M. Wing and Jim Woodcock and Jim Davies}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the World Congress on Formal Methods in the Development of Computing Systems (FM'99)}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = {1708}, year = {1999}, address = {Toulouse, France}, month = {September}, isbn = {3-540-66587-0} } \endverbatim */ /// /// \param f The formula to translate into an automaton. /// /// \param dict The spot::bdd_dict the constructed automata should use. /// /// \param exprop When set, the algorithm will consider all properties /// combinations possible on each state, in an attempt to reduce /// the non-determinism. The automaton will have the same size as /// without this option, but because the transition will be more /// deterministic, the product automaton will be smaller (or, at worse, /// equal). /// /// \param symb_merge When false, states with the same symbolic /// representation (these are equivalent formulae) will not be /// merged. /// /// \param branching_postponement When set, several transitions leaving /// from the same state with the same label (i.e., condition + acceptance /// conditions) will be merged. This correspond to an optimization /// described in the following paper. /** \verbatim @InProceedings{ sebastiani.03.charme, author = {Roberto Sebastiani and Stefano Tonetta}, title = {"More Deterministic" vs. "Smaller" B{\"u}chi Automata for Efficient LTL Model Checking}, booktitle = {Proceedings for the 12th Advanced Research Working Conference on Correct Hardware Design and Verification Methods (CHARME'03)}, pages = {126--140}, year = {2003}, editor = {G. Goos and J. Hartmanis and J. van Leeuwen}, volume = {2860}, series = {Lectures Notes in Computer Science}, month = {October}, publisher = {Springer-Verlag} } \endverbatim */ /// /// \param fair_loop_approx When set, a really simple characterization of /// unstable state is used to suppress all acceptance conditions from /// incoming transitions. /// /// \param unobs When non-zero, the atomic propositions in the LTL formula /// are interpreted as events that exclude each other. The events in the /// formula are observable events, and \c unobs can be filled with /// additional unobservable events. /// /// \param simplifier If this parameter is set, the LTL formulae /// representing each state of the automaton will be simplified /// before computing the successor. \a simpl should be configured /// for the type of reduction you want, see /// spot::ltl::ltl_simplifier. This idea is taken from the /// following paper. /** \verbatim @InProceedings{ thirioux.02.fmics, author = {Xavier Thirioux}, title = {Simple and Efficient Translation from {LTL} Formulas to {B\"u}chi Automata}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th International ERCIM Workshop in Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS'02)}, series = {Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science}, volume = {66(2)}, publisher = {Elsevier}, editor = {Rance Cleaveland and Hubert Garavel}, year = {2002}, month = jul, address = {M{\'a}laga, Spain} } \endverbatim */ /// /// \param unambiguous When true, unambigous TGBA will be produced using /// the trick described in the following paper. /** \verbatim @InProceedings{ benedikt.13.tacas, author = {Michael Benedikt and Rastislav Lenhardt and James Worrell}, title = {{LTL} Model Checking of Interval Markov Chains}, booktitle = {19th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (TACAS'13)}, year = {2013}, pages = {32--46}, series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, volume = {7795}, editor = {Nir Piterman and Scott A. Smolka}, publisher = {Springer} } \endverbatim */ /// /// \return A spot::twa_graph that recognizes the language of \a f. SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr ltl_to_tgba_fm(const ltl::formula* f, const bdd_dict_ptr& dict, bool exprop = false, bool symb_merge = true, bool branching_postponement = false, bool fair_loop_approx = false, const ltl::atomic_prop_set* unobs = 0, ltl::ltl_simplifier* simplifier = 0, bool unambiguous = false); }