* src/tgbaalgos/ltl2tgba_fm.cc (ltl_to_tgba_fm): Take an exprop
argument. Consider all possible combinations of propositions when generating arcs. Suggested by Jean-Michel Couvreur. * src/tgbaalgos/ltl2tgba_fm.hh (ltl_to_tgba_fm): Adjust. * src/tgbatest/ltl2tgba.cc: Honor -fx. * src/tgbatest/spotlbtt.test: Exercise -fx. * wrap/python/cgi/ltl2tgba.in: Support Couvreur/FM with exploded properties.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f2c6db6d49
commit
07ba321e0a
6 changed files with 100 additions and 39 deletions
|
|
@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tgba_explicit*
|
||||
ltl_to_tgba_fm(const formula* f, bdd_dict* dict)
|
||||
ltl_to_tgba_fm(const formula* f, bdd_dict* dict, bool exprop)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Normalize the formula. We want all the negations on
|
||||
// the atomic propositions. We also suppress logic
|
||||
|
|
@ -506,61 +506,74 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// to handle this, we take the conditions of any transition
|
||||
// going to true (it's `g' here), and remove it from the other
|
||||
// transitions.
|
||||
// It might be interesting to look at ways to generalize this.
|
||||
// (Replace `g' by an arbitrary boolean function when thinking
|
||||
// about it).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// In `exprop' mode, considering all possible combinations of
|
||||
// outgoing propositions generalizes the above trick.
|
||||
|
||||
typedef std::map<bdd, bdd, bdd_less_than> prom_map;
|
||||
typedef Sgi::hash_map<const formula*, prom_map, ptr_hash<formula> >
|
||||
dest_map;
|
||||
dest_map dests;
|
||||
// Compute all outgoing arcs.
|
||||
minato_isop isop(res);
|
||||
bdd cube;
|
||||
while ((cube = isop.next()) != bddfalse)
|
||||
bdd all_props = bddtrue;
|
||||
bdd var_set = bdd_existcomp(bdd_support(res), d.var_set);
|
||||
while (all_props != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const formula* dest =
|
||||
d.conj_bdd_to_formula(bdd_existcomp(cube, d.next_set));
|
||||
|
||||
// If we already know a state with the same successors,
|
||||
// use it in lieu of the current one. (See the comments
|
||||
// for canonical_succ.) We need to do this only for new
|
||||
// destinations.
|
||||
if (formulae_seen.find(dest) == formulae_seen.end())
|
||||
bdd one_prop_set =
|
||||
exprop ? bdd_satoneset(all_props, var_set, bddtrue) : bddtrue;
|
||||
all_props -= one_prop_set;
|
||||
minato_isop isop(res & one_prop_set);
|
||||
bdd cube;
|
||||
while ((cube = isop.next()) != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
dest->accept(v);
|
||||
bdd succbdd = v.result();
|
||||
succ_to_formula::iterator cs = canonical_succ.find(succbdd);
|
||||
if (cs != canonical_succ.end())
|
||||
const formula* dest =
|
||||
d.conj_bdd_to_formula(bdd_existcomp(cube, d.next_set));
|
||||
|
||||
// If we already know a state with the same successors,
|
||||
// use it in lieu of the current one. (See the comments
|
||||
// for canonical_succ.) We need to do this only for new
|
||||
// destinations.
|
||||
if (formulae_seen.find(dest) == formulae_seen.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
destroy(dest);
|
||||
dest = clone(cs->second);
|
||||
dest->accept(v);
|
||||
bdd succbdd = v.result();
|
||||
succ_to_formula::iterator cs =
|
||||
canonical_succ.find(succbdd);
|
||||
if (cs != canonical_succ.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
destroy(dest);
|
||||
dest = clone(cs->second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
canonical_succ[succbdd] = dest;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bdd promises = bdd_existcomp(cube, d.a_set);
|
||||
bdd conds =
|
||||
exprop ? one_prop_set : bdd_existcomp(cube, var_set);
|
||||
|
||||
dest_map::iterator i = dests.find(dest);
|
||||
if (i == dests.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
dests[dest][promises] = conds;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
canonical_succ[succbdd] = dest;
|
||||
i->second[promises] |= conds;
|
||||
destroy(dest);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bdd promises = bdd_existcomp(cube, d.a_set);
|
||||
bdd conds = bdd_existcomp(cube, d.var_set);
|
||||
|
||||
dest_map::iterator i = dests.find(dest);
|
||||
if (i == dests.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
dests[dest][promises] = conds;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
i->second[promises] |= conds;
|
||||
destroy(dest);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for an arc going to True. Register it first, that
|
||||
// way it will be explored before the other during the model
|
||||
// checking.
|
||||
dest_map::const_iterator i = dests.find(constant::true_instance());
|
||||
// conditions of the True arc, so when can remove them from
|
||||
// all other arcs. This is not needed when exprop is used,
|
||||
// but it does not hurt.
|
||||
bdd cond_for_true = bddfalse;
|
||||
if (i != dests.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
// Copyright (C) 2003 Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6),
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6),
|
||||
// département Systèmes Répartis Coopératifs (SRC), Université Pierre
|
||||
// et Marie Curie.
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,8 +46,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// month = {September},
|
||||
/// isbn = {3-540-66587-0}
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If \a exprop is set, the algorithm will consider all properties
|
||||
/// combinations possible on each state, in an attempt to reduce
|
||||
/// the non-determinism.
|
||||
/// \endverbatim
|
||||
tgba_explicit* ltl_to_tgba_fm(const ltl::formula* f, bdd_dict* dict);
|
||||
tgba_explicit* ltl_to_tgba_fm(const ltl::formula* f, bdd_dict* dict,
|
||||
bool exprop = false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif // SPOT_TGBA_LTL2TGBA_HH
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue