Remove marks from acceptance condition without stripping
Author: Alexandre Duret-Lutz. * NEWS: mention the modification. * spot/twa/acc.cc, spot/twa/acc.hh: Implement the removal. * spot/twa/twa.hh: Allow directly setting a new acceptance condition.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1042a8dae1
commit
24b5a350d4
4 changed files with 77 additions and 16 deletions
6
NEWS
6
NEWS
|
|
@ -93,6 +93,12 @@ New in spot 2.3.4.dev (not yet released)
|
|||
scc_info::common_sets_of(scc), and they are used by scc_info to
|
||||
classify some SCCs as rejecting more easily.
|
||||
|
||||
- The new function acc_code::remove() removes all the given
|
||||
acceptance sets from the acceptance condition.
|
||||
|
||||
- It is now possible to change an automaton acceptance condition
|
||||
directly by calling twa::set_acceptance().
|
||||
|
||||
Python:
|
||||
|
||||
- The 'spot.gen' package exports the functions from libspotgen.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1253,10 +1253,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code acc_cond::acc_code::complement() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (is_t())
|
||||
|
|
@ -1267,7 +1265,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
static acc_cond::acc_code
|
||||
strip_rec(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t rem, bool missing)
|
||||
strip_rec(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t rem, bool missing,
|
||||
bool strip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto start = pos - pos->sub.size;
|
||||
switch (pos->sub.op)
|
||||
|
|
@ -1278,7 +1277,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
auto res = acc_cond::acc_code::t();
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, rem, missing) & std::move(res);
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, rem, missing, strip) & std::move(res);
|
||||
std::swap(tmp, res);
|
||||
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1291,7 +1290,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
auto res = acc_cond::acc_code::f();
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, rem, missing) | std::move(res);
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, rem, missing, strip) | std::move(res);
|
||||
std::swap(tmp, res);
|
||||
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -1301,11 +1300,15 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
|
||||
if (missing && (pos[-1].mark & rem))
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::t();
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::fin(pos[-1].mark.strip(rem));
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::fin(strip
|
||||
? pos[-1].mark.strip(rem)
|
||||
: pos[-1].mark - rem);
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
|
||||
if (missing && (pos[-1].mark & rem))
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::f();
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::inf(pos[-1].mark.strip(rem));
|
||||
return acc_cond::acc_code::inf(strip
|
||||
? pos[-1].mark.strip(rem)
|
||||
: pos[-1].mark - rem);
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
|
||||
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
|
|
@ -1321,7 +1324,15 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (is_t() || is_f())
|
||||
return *this;
|
||||
return strip_rec(&back(), rem, missing);
|
||||
return strip_rec(&back(), rem, missing, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code::remove(acc_cond::mark_t rem, bool missing) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (is_t() || is_f())
|
||||
return *this;
|
||||
return strip_rec(&back(), rem, missing, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -387,14 +387,16 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
|
||||
pos -= 2;
|
||||
auto m = (*this)[pos].mark;
|
||||
auto om = other[pos].mark;
|
||||
if (m < om)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
if (m > om)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
{
|
||||
pos -= 2;
|
||||
auto m = (*this)[pos].mark;
|
||||
auto om = other[pos].mark;
|
||||
if (m < om)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
if (m > om)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
|
@ -906,6 +908,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// If MISSING is unset, Inf(rem) become t while Fin(rem) become
|
||||
// f. Removing 2 from (Inf(1)&Inf(2))|Fin(3) would then give
|
||||
// Inf(1)|Fin(3).
|
||||
acc_code remove(acc_cond::mark_t rem, bool missing) const;
|
||||
// Same as remove, but also shift numbers
|
||||
acc_code strip(acc_cond::mark_t rem, bool missing) const;
|
||||
|
||||
// Return the set of sets appearing in the condition.
|
||||
|
|
@ -1295,6 +1299,38 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return u;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Remove all the acceptance sets in rem.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If MISSING is set, the acceptance sets are assumed to be
|
||||
// missing from the automaton, and the acceptance is updated to
|
||||
// reflect this. For instance (Inf(1)&Inf(2))|Fin(3) will
|
||||
// become Fin(3) if we remove 2 because it is missing from this
|
||||
// automaton, because there is no way to fulfill Inf(1)&Inf(2)
|
||||
// in this case. So essentially MISSING causes Inf(rem) to
|
||||
// become f, and Fin(rem) to become t.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If MISSING is unset, Inf(rem) become t while Fin(rem) become
|
||||
// f. Removing 2 from (Inf(1)&Inf(2))|Fin(3) would then give
|
||||
// Inf(1)|Fin(3).
|
||||
acc_cond remove(mark_t rem, bool missing) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return {num_sets(), code_.remove(rem, missing)};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Same as remove, but also shift the set numbers
|
||||
acc_cond strip(mark_t rem, bool missing) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return
|
||||
{ num_sets() - (all_sets() & rem).count(), code_.strip(rem, missing) };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Restrict an acceptance condition to a subset of set numbers
|
||||
// that are occurring at some point.
|
||||
acc_cond restrict_to(mark_t rem) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return {num_sets(), code_.remove(all_sets() - rem, true)};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
mark_t::value_t all_sets_() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -924,6 +924,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
acc_.set_acceptance(c);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Set the acceptance condition of the automaton.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param c another acceptance condition
|
||||
void set_acceptance(const acc_cond& c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_ = c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Copy the acceptance condition of another TωA.
|
||||
void copy_acceptance_of(const const_twa_ptr& a)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue