alarsyo/spot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

* src/tgbaalgos/gtec/gtec.hh (emptiness_check_shy::find_state): Add

Browse source 
comments.
* iface/gspn/ssp.cc (emptiness_check_shy_ssp::find_state): Likewise.
Soheib and I had a hard time figuring why we did this...
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz 2004-07-07 12:00:11 +00:00
parent f1c3af808f
commit 478844dad8
3 changed files with 20 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
ChangeLog
View file

@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
2004-07-07 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <adl@src.lip6.fr>
* src/tgbaalgos/gtec/gtec.hh (emptiness_check_shy::find_state): Add
comments.
* iface/gspn/ssp.cc (emptiness_check_shy_ssp::find_state): Likewise.
Soheib and I had a hard time figuring why we did this...
2004-07-02 Thomas Martinez <martinez@src.lip6.fr>
* src/tgba/tgbareduc.cc, src/tgba/tgbareduc.hh,

5
iface/gspn/ssp.cc
View file

@ -909,6 +909,11 @@ namespace spot
}
protected:
// If a new state includes an older state, we may have to add new
// children to the list of children of that older state. We cannot
// to this by sub-classing numbered_state_heap since TODO is not
// available. So we override find_state() instead.
virtual int*
find_state(const state* s)
{

8
src/tgbaalgos/gtec/gtec.hh
View file

@ -135,6 +135,14 @@ namespace spot
typedef std::pair<const state*, succ_queue> pair_state_successors;
std::stack<pair_state_successors> todo;
/// \brief find the SCC number of a unprocessed state.
///
/// Sometimes we want to modify some of the above structures when
/// looking up a new state. This happens for instance when find()
/// must perform inclusion checking and add new states to process
/// to TODO during this step. (Because TODO must be known,
/// sub-classing spot::numbered_state_heap is not enough.) Then
/// overriding this method is the way to go.
virtual int* find_state(const state* s);
};