support for semi-deterministic property

* spot/twa/twa.hh (prop_semi_deterministic): New methods.
* spot/parseaut/parseaut.yy, spot/twaalgos/hoa.cc: Add support for the
semi-deterministic property.
* doc/org/concepts.org, doc/org/hoa.org: Document it.
* spot/twaalgos/isdet.cc,
spot/twaalgos/isdet.hh (is_semi_deterministic): New function.
* bin/autfilt.cc: Add --is-semi-deterministic.
* bin/common_aoutput.cc: Add --check=semi-deterministic.
* tests/core/semidet.test: New file.
* tests/Makefile.am: Add it.
* tests/core/parseaut.test, tests/core/readsave.test: Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz 2016-12-29 16:37:43 +01:00
parent db5d9780f1
commit 4b01387817
14 changed files with 265 additions and 50 deletions

View file

@ -554,7 +554,6 @@ $txt
#+RESULTS:
[[file:concept-twa1.png]]
* Alternating ω-automata
Alternating ω-automata are ω-automata in which the destination of an
@ -1055,16 +1054,17 @@ better choices.
There are actually several property flags that are stored into each
automaton, and that can be queried or set by algorithms:
| flag name | meaning when =true= |
|---------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| =state_acc= | automaton should be considered has having state-based acceptance |
| =inherently_weak= | accepting and rejecting cycles cannot be mixed in the same SCC |
| =weak= | transitions of an SCC all belong to the same acceptance sets |
| =very-weak= | weak automaton where all SCCs have size 1 |
| =terminal= | automaton is weak, accepting SCCs are complete, accepting edges may not go to rejecting SCCs |
| =deterministic= | there is at most one run *recognizing* a word, but not necessarily accepting it |
| =unambiguous= | there is at most one run *accepting* a word (but it might be recognized several time) |
| =stutter_invariant= | the property recognized by the automaton is [[https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~adl/dl/adl/michaud.15.spin.pdf][stutter-invariant]] |
| flag name | meaning when =true= |
|----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| =state_acc= | automaton should be considered has having state-based acceptance |
| =inherently_weak= | accepting and rejecting cycles cannot be mixed in the same SCC |
| =weak= | transitions of an SCC all belong to the same acceptance sets |
| =very-weak= | weak automaton where all SCCs have size 1 |
| =terminal= | automaton is weak, accepting SCCs are complete, accepting edges may not go to rejecting SCCs |
| =deterministic= | there is at most one run *recognizing* a word, but not necessarily accepting it |
| =semi-deterministic= | any nondeterminism occurs before entering an accepting SCC |
| =unambiguous= | there is at most one run *accepting* a word (but it might be recognized several time) |
| =stutter_invariant= | the property recognized by the automaton is [[https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~adl/dl/adl/michaud.15.spin.pdf][stutter-invariant]] |
For each flag =flagname=, the =twa= class has a method
=prop_flagname()= that returns the value of the flag as an instance of