remfin: implement the BA-type check
* src/twaalgos/remfin.cc: Here. * src/tests/remfin.test: Add a single test. * src/twa/acc.hh (mark_t::lowest): New function.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a3a07d8a4
commit
4bef219d8f
3 changed files with 345 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
|
|||
#include <iostream>
|
||||
#include "cleanacc.hh"
|
||||
#include "totgba.hh"
|
||||
#include "mask.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
//#define TRACE
|
||||
#ifdef TRACE
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,6 +35,98 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Check whether the SCC composed of all states STATES, and
|
||||
// visiting all acceptance marks in SETS contains non-accepting
|
||||
// cycles.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// A cycle is accepting (in a Rabin automaton) if there exists an
|
||||
// acceptance pair (Fᵢ, Iᵢ) such that some states from Iᵢ are
|
||||
// visited while no states from Fᵢ are visited.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Consequently, a cycle is non-accepting if for all acceptance
|
||||
// pairs (Fᵢ, Iᵢ), either no states from Iᵢ are visited or some
|
||||
// states from Fᵢ are visited. (This corresponds to an accepting
|
||||
// cycle with Streett acceptance.)
|
||||
bool is_scc_ba_type(const const_twa_graph_ptr& aut,
|
||||
const std::vector<unsigned>& states,
|
||||
std::vector<bool>& final,
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t inf,
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t sets)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Consider the SCC as one large cycle and check its
|
||||
// intersection with all Fᵢs and Iᵢs: This is the SETS
|
||||
// variable.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Let f=[F₁,F₂,...] and i=[I₁,I₂,...] be bitvectors where bit
|
||||
// Fᵢ (resp. Iᵢ) indicates that Fᵢ (resp. Iᵢ) has been visited
|
||||
// in the SCC.
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t f = (sets << 1) & inf;
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t i = sets & inf;
|
||||
// If we have i&!f = [0,0,...] that means that the cycle formed
|
||||
// by the entire SCC is not accepting. However that does not
|
||||
// necessarily imply that all cycles in the SCC are also
|
||||
// non-accepting. We may have a smaller cycle that is
|
||||
// accepting, but which becomes non-accepting when extended with
|
||||
// more states.
|
||||
i -= f;
|
||||
if (!i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Check whether the SCC is accepting. We do that by simply
|
||||
// converting that SCC into a TGBA and running our emptiness
|
||||
// check. This is not a really smart implementation and
|
||||
// could be improved.
|
||||
std::vector<bool> keep(aut->num_states(), false);
|
||||
for (auto s: states)
|
||||
keep[s] = true;
|
||||
auto sccaut = mask_keep_states(aut, keep, states.front());
|
||||
// Force SBA to false. It does not affect the emptiness
|
||||
// check result, however it prevent recurring into this
|
||||
// procedure, because empty() will call to_tgba() wich will
|
||||
// call remove_fin()...
|
||||
sccaut->prop_state_based_acc(false);
|
||||
// If SCCAUT is empty, the SCC is DBA realizable (and none
|
||||
// of its states are final). If SCCAUT is nonempty, the SCC
|
||||
// is not DBA realizable.
|
||||
return sccaut->is_empty();
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The bits remaining sets in i corresponds to I₁s that have
|
||||
// been seen with seeing the mathing F₁. In this SCC any state
|
||||
// in these I₁ is therefore final. Otherwise we do not know: it
|
||||
// is possible that there is a non-accepting cycle in the SCC
|
||||
// that do not visit Fᵢ.
|
||||
std::set<unsigned> unknown;
|
||||
for (auto s: states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (aut->state_acc_sets(s) & i)
|
||||
final[s] = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
unknown.insert(s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Check whether it is possible to build non-accepting cycles
|
||||
// using only the "unknown" states.
|
||||
while (!unknown.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<bool> keep(aut->num_states(), false);
|
||||
for (auto s: unknown)
|
||||
keep[s] = true;
|
||||
|
||||
scc_info si(mask_keep_states(aut, keep, *unknown.begin()));
|
||||
unsigned scc_max = si.scc_count();
|
||||
for (unsigned scc = 0; scc < scc_max; ++scc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (auto s: si.states_of(scc))
|
||||
unknown.erase(s);
|
||||
if (si.is_trivial(scc))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!is_scc_ba_type(aut, si.states_of(scc),
|
||||
final, inf, si.acc(scc)))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// If the DNF is
|
||||
// Fin(1)&Inf(2)&Inf(4) | Fin(2)&Fin(3)&Inf(1) |
|
||||
// Inf(1)&Inf(3) | Inf(1)&Inf(2) | Fin(4)
|
||||
|
|
@ -118,6 +211,50 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
if (!aut->acc().uses_fin_acceptance())
|
||||
return std::const_pointer_cast<twa_graph>(aut);
|
||||
|
||||
scc_info si(aut);
|
||||
|
||||
// For state-based Rabin automata, we check each SCC for
|
||||
// BA-typeness. If an SCC is BA-type, its final states are stored
|
||||
// in BA_FINAL_STATES.
|
||||
std::vector<bool> scc_is_ba_type(si.scc_count(), false);
|
||||
bool ba_type = false;
|
||||
std::vector<bool> ba_final_states;
|
||||
if (aut->has_state_based_acc()
|
||||
&& aut->is_deterministic()
|
||||
&& aut->acc().is_rabin() > 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t fin;
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t inf;
|
||||
std::tie(inf, fin) = aut->get_acceptance().used_inf_fin_sets();
|
||||
assert((fin << 1) == inf);
|
||||
ba_final_states.resize(aut->num_states(), false);
|
||||
ba_type = true; // until proven otherwise
|
||||
unsigned scc_max = si.scc_count();
|
||||
for (unsigned scc = 0; scc < scc_max; ++scc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (si.is_trivial(scc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc_is_ba_type[scc] = true;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
bool scc_ba_type =
|
||||
is_scc_ba_type(aut, si.states_of(scc),
|
||||
ba_final_states, inf, si.acc(scc));
|
||||
ba_type &= scc_ba_type;
|
||||
scc_is_ba_type[scc] = scc_ba_type;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#if TRACE
|
||||
trace << "SCC DBA-realizibility\n";
|
||||
for (unsigned scc = 0; scc < scc_max; ++scc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
trace << scc << ": " << scc_is_ba_type[scc] << " {";
|
||||
for (auto s: si.states_of(scc))
|
||||
trace << ' ' << s;
|
||||
trace << " }\n";
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<acc_cond::acc_code> code;
|
||||
std::vector<acc_cond::mark_t> rem;
|
||||
std::vector<acc_cond::mark_t> keep;
|
||||
|
|
@ -257,13 +394,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
for (auto c: code)
|
||||
new_code.append_or(std::move(c));
|
||||
|
||||
// The condition to use for SCCs that are BA-type.
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t final_acc = allinf.lowest();
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned cs = code.size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < cs; ++i)
|
||||
trace << i << " Rem " << rem[i] << " Code " << code[i]
|
||||
<< " Keep " << keep[i] << '\n';
|
||||
|
||||
scc_info si(aut);
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned nst = aut->num_states();
|
||||
auto res = make_twa_graph(aut->get_dict());
|
||||
res->copy_ap_of(aut);
|
||||
|
|
@ -281,6 +419,22 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
trace << "SCC #" << n << " uses " << m << '\n';
|
||||
|
||||
// What to keep and add into the main copy
|
||||
|
||||
if (scc_is_ba_type[n])
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If the SCC is BA-type, we know exactly what state need to
|
||||
// be marked as accepting.
|
||||
for (auto s: states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t acc = 0U;
|
||||
if (ba_final_states[s])
|
||||
acc = final_acc;
|
||||
for (auto& t: aut->out(s))
|
||||
res->new_edge(s, t.dst, t.cond, acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t main_sets = 0U;
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t main_add = 0U;
|
||||
bool intersects_fin = false;
|
||||
|
|
@ -339,9 +493,11 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ba_type)
|
||||
res->prop_state_based_acc();
|
||||
|
||||
res->purge_dead_states();
|
||||
trace << "before cleanup: " << res->get_acceptance() << '\n';
|
||||
cleanup_acceptance_here(res);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue