get rid of tgba_tba_proxy
Replace it by a new degeneralize_tba(), that use the same tricks as degeneralize(). * src/tgba/tgbatba.cc, src/tgba/tgbatba.hh: Delete. * src/tgba/Makefile.am: Adjust. * src/tgbaalgos/degen.cc, src/tgbaalgos/degen.hh: Implement a degeneralize_tba() function sharing its code with degeneralize(). * src/tgbatest/ltl2tgba.cc: Rename -D to -DT so that we can pass it the same option as -DS. * src/tgbatest/degenid.test, src/tgbatest/emptchk.test, src/tgbatest/emptchke.test, src/tgbatest/ltlcounter.test, src/tgbatest/ltlcross.test, src/tgbatest/spotlbtt.test, src/tgbatest/ltl2tgba.test: Adjust. * src/tgbatest/det.test, src/tgbatest/emptchk.test: Adjust numbers to the smaller output. * src/saba/sabacomplementtgba.cc, src/saba/sabacomplementtgba.hh, src/tgbaalgos/minimize.cc, src/tgbaalgos/neverclaim.cc, src/tgbaalgos/neverclaim.hh, src/tgbaalgos/postproc.cc, src/tgbatest/randtgba.cc, src/tgbatest/complementation.cc, wrap/python/spot.i, wrap/python/tests/ltl2tgba.py, src/sabatest/sabacomplementtgba.cc: Adjust to the removal of tgba_tba_proxy, using degeneralize_tba() if needed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9893586cc
commit
5739240c0f
25 changed files with 488 additions and 1090 deletions
|
|
@ -249,363 +249,408 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
i->second.print(i->first, dict);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
template<bool want_sba>
|
||||
tgba_digraph*
|
||||
degeneralize_aux(const tgba* a, bool use_z_lvl, bool use_cust_acc_orders,
|
||||
int use_lvl_cache, bool skip_levels)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool use_scc = use_lvl_cache || use_cust_acc_orders || use_z_lvl;
|
||||
|
||||
bdd_dict* dict = a->get_dict();
|
||||
|
||||
// The result automaton is an SBA.
|
||||
auto res = new tgba_digraph(dict);
|
||||
if (want_sba)
|
||||
res->set_bprop(tgba_digraph::StateBasedAcc);
|
||||
|
||||
// We use the same BDD variables as the input, except for the
|
||||
// acceptance.
|
||||
dict->register_all_variables_of(a, res);
|
||||
dict->unregister_all_typed_variables(bdd_dict::acc, res);
|
||||
|
||||
// Invent a new acceptance set for the degeneralized automaton.
|
||||
int accvar =
|
||||
dict->register_acceptance_variable(ltl::constant::true_instance(), res);
|
||||
bdd degen_acc = bdd_ithvar(accvar);
|
||||
res->set_acceptance_conditions(degen_acc);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create an order of acceptance conditions. Each entry in this
|
||||
// vector correspond to an acceptance set. Each index can
|
||||
// be used as a level in degen_state to indicate the next expected
|
||||
// acceptance set. Level order.size() is a special level used to
|
||||
// denote accepting states.
|
||||
std::vector<bdd> order;
|
||||
{
|
||||
// The order is arbitrary, but it turns out that using push_back
|
||||
// instead of push_front often gives better results because
|
||||
// acceptance sets at the beginning if the cycle are more often
|
||||
// used in the automaton. (This surprising fact is probably
|
||||
// related to the order in which we declare the BDD variables
|
||||
// during the translation.)
|
||||
bdd all = a->all_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
while (all != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd next = bdd_satone(all);
|
||||
all -= next;
|
||||
order.push_back(next);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize scc_orders
|
||||
bdd allacc = a->all_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
scc_orders orders(a->all_acceptance_conditions(), skip_levels);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we always use the same pointer for identical states
|
||||
// from the input automaton.
|
||||
state_unicity_table uniq;
|
||||
|
||||
// Accepting loop checker, for some heuristics.
|
||||
has_acc_loop acc_loop(a, uniq);
|
||||
|
||||
// These maps make it possible to convert degen_state to number
|
||||
// and vice-versa.
|
||||
ds2num_map ds2num;
|
||||
|
||||
// This map is used to find transitions that go to the same
|
||||
// destination with the same acceptance. The integer key is
|
||||
// (dest*2+acc) where dest is the destination state number, and
|
||||
// acc is 1 iff the transition is accepting. The source
|
||||
// is always that of the current iteration.
|
||||
typedef std::map<int, unsigned> tr_cache_t;
|
||||
tr_cache_t tr_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
// State level cache
|
||||
typedef std::map<const state*, unsigned> lvl_cache_t;
|
||||
lvl_cache_t lvl_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
// Compute SCCs in order to use any optimization.
|
||||
scc_map m(a);
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
m.build_map();
|
||||
|
||||
// Cache for common outgoing acceptances.
|
||||
outgoing_acc outgoing(a, use_scc ? &m : 0);
|
||||
|
||||
queue_t todo;
|
||||
|
||||
const state* s0 = uniq(a->get_init_state());
|
||||
degen_state s(s0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// As a heuristic for building SBA, if the initial state has at
|
||||
// least one accepting self-loop, start the degeneralization on
|
||||
// the accepting level.
|
||||
if (want_sba && acc_loop.check(s0))
|
||||
s.second = order.size();
|
||||
// Otherwise, check for acceptance conditions common to all
|
||||
// outgoing transitions, and assume we have already seen these and
|
||||
// start on the associated level.
|
||||
if (s.second == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd acc = outgoing.common_acc(s.first);
|
||||
if (use_cust_acc_orders)
|
||||
s.second = orders.next_level(m.initial(), s.second, acc);
|
||||
else
|
||||
while (s.second < order.size() && bdd_implies(order[s.second], acc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
++s.second;
|
||||
if (!skip_levels)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// There is not accepting level for TBA, let reuse level 0.
|
||||
if (!want_sba && s.second == order.size())
|
||||
s.second = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ds2num[s] = res->new_state();
|
||||
todo.push_back(s);
|
||||
|
||||
// If use_lvl_cache is on insert initial state to level cache
|
||||
// Level cache stores first encountered level for each state.
|
||||
// When entering an SCC first the lvl_cache is checked.
|
||||
// If such state exists level from chache is used.
|
||||
// If not, a new level (starting with 0) is computed.
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache)
|
||||
lvl_cache[s.first] = s.second;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
s = todo.front();
|
||||
todo.pop_front();
|
||||
int src = ds2num[s];
|
||||
unsigned slevel = s.second;
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have a state on the last level, it should be accepting.
|
||||
bool is_acc = slevel == order.size();
|
||||
// On the accepting level, start again from level 0.
|
||||
if (want_sba && is_acc)
|
||||
slevel = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check SCC for state s
|
||||
int s_scc = -1;
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
s_scc = m.scc_of_state(s.first);
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto i: a->succ(s.first))
|
||||
{
|
||||
degen_state d(uniq(i->current_state()), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Check whether the target SCC is accepting
|
||||
bool is_scc_acc;
|
||||
int scc;
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc = m.scc_of_state(d.first);
|
||||
is_scc_acc = m.accepting(scc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If we have no SCC information, treat all SCCs as
|
||||
// accepting.
|
||||
scc = -1;
|
||||
is_scc_acc = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The old level is slevel. What should be the new one?
|
||||
bdd acc = i->current_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
bdd otheracc = outgoing.common_acc(d.first);
|
||||
|
||||
if (want_sba && is_acc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Ignore the last expected acceptance set (the value of
|
||||
// *prev below) if it is common to all other outgoing
|
||||
// transitions (of the current state) AND if it is not
|
||||
// used by any outgoing transition of the destination
|
||||
// state.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 1) It's correct to do that, because this acceptance
|
||||
// set is common to other outgoing transitions.
|
||||
// Therefore if we make a cycle to this state we
|
||||
// will eventually see that acceptance set thanks
|
||||
// to the "pulling" of the common acceptance sets
|
||||
// of the destination state (d.first).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 2) It's also desirable because it makes the
|
||||
// degeneralization idempotent (up to a renaming
|
||||
// of states). Consider the following automaton
|
||||
// where 1 is initial and => marks accepting
|
||||
// transitions: 1=>1, 1=>2, 2->2, 2->1. This is
|
||||
// already an SBA, with 1 as accepting state.
|
||||
// However if you try degeralize it without
|
||||
// ignoring *prev, you'll get two copies of state
|
||||
// 2, depending on whether we reach it using 1=>2
|
||||
// or from 2->2. If this example was not clear,
|
||||
// play with the "degenid.test" test case.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 3) Ignoring all common acceptance sets would also
|
||||
// be correct, but it would make the
|
||||
// degeneralization produce larger automata in some
|
||||
// cases. The current condition to ignore only one
|
||||
// acceptance set if is this not used by the next
|
||||
// state is a heuristic that is compatible with
|
||||
// point 2) above while not causing more states to
|
||||
// be generated in our benchmark of 188 formulae
|
||||
// from the literature.
|
||||
if (!order.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned prev = order.size() - 1;
|
||||
bdd common = outgoing.common_acc(s.first);
|
||||
if (bdd_implies(order[prev], common))
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd u = outgoing.union_acc(d.first);
|
||||
if (!bdd_implies(order[prev], u))
|
||||
acc -= order[prev];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// A transition in the SLEVEL acceptance set should
|
||||
// be directed to the next acceptance set. If the
|
||||
// current transition is also in the next acceptance
|
||||
// set, then go to the one after, etc.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See Denis Oddoux's PhD thesis for a nice
|
||||
// explanation (in French).
|
||||
// @PhDThesis{ oddoux.03.phd,
|
||||
// author = {Denis Oddoux},
|
||||
// title = {Utilisation des automates alternants pour un
|
||||
// model-checking efficace des logiques
|
||||
// temporelles lin{\'e}aires.},
|
||||
// school = {Universit{\'e}e Paris 7},
|
||||
// year = {2003},
|
||||
// address= {Paris, France},
|
||||
// month = {December}
|
||||
// }
|
||||
if (is_scc_acc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If lvl_cache is used and switching SCCs, use level
|
||||
// from cache
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache && s_scc != scc
|
||||
&& lvl_cache.find(d.first) != lvl_cache.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = lvl_cache[d.first];
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Complete (or replace) the acceptance sets of
|
||||
// this link with the acceptance sets common to
|
||||
// all transitions leaving the destination state.
|
||||
if (s_scc == scc)
|
||||
acc |= otheracc;
|
||||
else
|
||||
acc = otheracc;
|
||||
|
||||
// If use_z_lvl is on, start with level zero 0 when
|
||||
// swhitching SCCs
|
||||
unsigned next = (!use_z_lvl || s_scc == scc) ? slevel : 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// If using custom acc orders, get next level
|
||||
// for this scc
|
||||
if (use_cust_acc_orders)
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = orders.next_level(scc, next, acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Else compute level according the global acc order
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// As a heuristic, if we enter the SCC on a
|
||||
// state that has at least one accepting
|
||||
// self-loop, start the degeneralization on
|
||||
// the accepting level.
|
||||
if (s_scc != scc && acc_loop.check(d.first))
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = order.size();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Consider both the current acceptance
|
||||
// sets, and the acceptance sets common to
|
||||
// the outgoing transitions of the
|
||||
// destination state. But don't do
|
||||
// that if the state is accepting and we
|
||||
// are not skipping levels.
|
||||
if (skip_levels || !is_acc)
|
||||
while (next < order.size()
|
||||
&& bdd_implies(order[next], acc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
++next;
|
||||
if (!skip_levels)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
d.second = next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// In case we are building a TBA is_acc has to be
|
||||
// set differently for each transition, and
|
||||
// we do not need to stay use final level.
|
||||
if (!want_sba)
|
||||
{
|
||||
is_acc = d.second == order.size();
|
||||
if (is_acc) // The transition is accepting
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = 0; // Make it go to the first level.
|
||||
// Skip levels as much as possible.
|
||||
if (acc != allacc && !skip_levels)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (use_cust_acc_orders)
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = orders.next_level(scc, d.second, acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (d.second < order.size() &&
|
||||
bdd_implies(order[d.second], acc))
|
||||
++d.second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Have we already seen this destination?
|
||||
int dest;
|
||||
ds2num_map::const_iterator di = ds2num.find(d);
|
||||
if (di != ds2num.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
dest = di->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
dest = res->new_state();
|
||||
ds2num[d] = dest;
|
||||
todo.push_back(d);
|
||||
// Insert new state to cache
|
||||
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto res = lvl_cache.emplace(d.first, d.second);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!res.second)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache == 3)
|
||||
res.first->second =
|
||||
std::max(res.first->second, d.second);
|
||||
else if (use_lvl_cache == 2)
|
||||
res.first->second =
|
||||
std::min(res.first->second, d.second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned& t = tr_cache[dest * 2 + is_acc];
|
||||
|
||||
if (t == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Actually create the transition. If the source
|
||||
// state is accepting, we have to put degen_acc on all
|
||||
// outgoing transitions. (We are still building a
|
||||
// TGBA; we only assure that it can be used as an
|
||||
// SBA.)
|
||||
bdd acc = bddfalse;
|
||||
if (is_acc)
|
||||
acc = degen_acc;
|
||||
t = res->new_transition(src, dest,
|
||||
i->current_condition(), acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
res->trans_data(t).cond |= i->current_condition();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
tr_cache.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEGEN_DEBUG
|
||||
std::vector<bdd>::iterator i;
|
||||
std::cout << "Orig. order: \t";
|
||||
for (i = order.begin(); i != order.end(); i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd_print_acc(std::cout, dict, *i);
|
||||
std::cout << ", ";
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::cout << std::endl;
|
||||
orders.print(dict);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
res->merge_transitions();
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tgba_digraph*
|
||||
degeneralize(const tgba* a, bool use_z_lvl, bool use_cust_acc_orders,
|
||||
int use_lvl_cache, bool skip_levels)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool use_scc = use_lvl_cache || use_cust_acc_orders || use_z_lvl;
|
||||
return degeneralize_aux<true>(a, use_z_lvl, use_cust_acc_orders,
|
||||
use_lvl_cache, skip_levels);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bdd_dict* dict = a->get_dict();
|
||||
|
||||
// The result automaton is an SBA.
|
||||
auto res = new tgba_digraph(dict);
|
||||
res->set_bprop(tgba_digraph::SBA);
|
||||
|
||||
// We use the same BDD variables as the input, except for the
|
||||
// acceptance.
|
||||
dict->register_all_variables_of(a, res);
|
||||
dict->unregister_all_typed_variables(bdd_dict::acc, res);
|
||||
|
||||
// Invent a new acceptance set for the degeneralized automaton.
|
||||
int accvar =
|
||||
dict->register_acceptance_variable(ltl::constant::true_instance(), res);
|
||||
bdd degen_acc = bdd_ithvar(accvar);
|
||||
res->set_acceptance_conditions(degen_acc);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create an order of acceptance conditions. Each entry in this
|
||||
// vector correspond to an acceptance set. Each index can
|
||||
// be used as a level in degen_state to indicate the next expected
|
||||
// acceptance set. Level order.size() is a special level used to
|
||||
// denote accepting states.
|
||||
std::vector<bdd> order;
|
||||
{
|
||||
// The order is arbitrary, but it turns out that using push_back
|
||||
// instead of push_front often gives better results because
|
||||
// acceptance sets at the beginning if the cycle are more often
|
||||
// used in the automaton. (This surprising fact is probably
|
||||
// related to the order in which we declare the BDD variables
|
||||
// during the translation.)
|
||||
bdd all = a->all_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
while (all != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd next = bdd_satone(all);
|
||||
all -= next;
|
||||
order.push_back(next);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialize scc_orders
|
||||
scc_orders orders(a->all_acceptance_conditions(), skip_levels);
|
||||
|
||||
// Make sure we always use the same pointer for identical states
|
||||
// from the input automaton.
|
||||
state_unicity_table uniq;
|
||||
|
||||
// Accepting loop checker, for some heuristics.
|
||||
has_acc_loop acc_loop(a, uniq);
|
||||
|
||||
// These maps make it possible to convert degen_state to number
|
||||
// and vice-versa.
|
||||
ds2num_map ds2num;
|
||||
|
||||
// This map is used to find transitions that go to the same
|
||||
// destination with the same acceptance. The integer key is
|
||||
// (dest*2+acc) where dest is the destination state number, and
|
||||
// acc is 1 iff the transition is accepting. The source
|
||||
// is always that of the current iteration.
|
||||
typedef std::map<int, unsigned> tr_cache_t;
|
||||
tr_cache_t tr_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
// State level cache
|
||||
typedef std::map<const state*, unsigned> lvl_cache_t;
|
||||
lvl_cache_t lvl_cache;
|
||||
|
||||
// Compute SCCs in order to use any optimization.
|
||||
scc_map m(a);
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
m.build_map();
|
||||
|
||||
// Cache for common outgoing acceptances.
|
||||
outgoing_acc outgoing(a, use_scc ? &m : 0);
|
||||
|
||||
queue_t todo;
|
||||
|
||||
const state* s0 = uniq(a->get_init_state());
|
||||
degen_state s(s0, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// As an heuristic, if the initial state at least one accepting
|
||||
// self-loop, start the degeneralization on the accepting level.
|
||||
if (acc_loop.check(s0))
|
||||
s.second = order.size();
|
||||
// Otherwise, check for acceptance conditions common to all
|
||||
// outgoing transitions, and assume we have already seen these and
|
||||
// start on the associated level.
|
||||
if (s.second == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd acc = outgoing.common_acc(s.first);
|
||||
if (use_cust_acc_orders)
|
||||
s.second = orders.next_level(m.initial(), s.second, acc);
|
||||
else
|
||||
while (s.second < order.size() && bdd_implies(order[s.second], acc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
++s.second;
|
||||
if (!skip_levels)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ds2num[s] = res->new_state();
|
||||
todo.push_back(s);
|
||||
|
||||
// If use_lvl_cache is on insert initial state to level cache
|
||||
// Level cache stores first encountered level for each state.
|
||||
// When entering an SCC first the lvl_cache is checked.
|
||||
// If such state exists level from chache is used.
|
||||
// If not, a new level (starting with 0) is computed.
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache)
|
||||
lvl_cache[s.first] = s.second;
|
||||
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
s = todo.front();
|
||||
todo.pop_front();
|
||||
int src = ds2num[s];
|
||||
unsigned slevel = s.second;
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have a state on the last level, it should be accepting.
|
||||
bool is_acc = slevel == order.size();
|
||||
// On the accepting level, start again from level 0.
|
||||
if (is_acc)
|
||||
slevel = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// Check SCC for state s
|
||||
int s_scc = -1;
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
s_scc = m.scc_of_state(s.first);
|
||||
|
||||
for (auto i: a->succ(s.first))
|
||||
{
|
||||
degen_state d(uniq(i->current_state()), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEGEN_DEBUG
|
||||
if (names.find(d.first) == names.end())
|
||||
names[d.first] = uniq.size();
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
// Check whether the target SCC is accepting
|
||||
bool is_scc_acc;
|
||||
int scc;
|
||||
if (use_scc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc = m.scc_of_state(d.first);
|
||||
is_scc_acc = m.accepting(scc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If we have no SCC information, treat all SCCs as
|
||||
// accepting.
|
||||
scc = -1;
|
||||
is_scc_acc = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The old level is slevel. What should be the new one?
|
||||
bdd acc = i->current_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
bdd otheracc = outgoing.common_acc(d.first);
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_acc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Ignore the last expected acceptance set (the value of
|
||||
// *prev below) if it is common to all other outgoing
|
||||
// transitions (of the current state) AND if it is not
|
||||
// used by any outgoing transition of the destination
|
||||
// state.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 1) It's correct to do that, because this acceptance
|
||||
// set is common to other outgoing transitions.
|
||||
// Therefore if we make a cycle to this state we
|
||||
// will eventually see that acceptance set thanks
|
||||
// to the "pulling" of the common acceptance sets
|
||||
// of the destination state (d.first).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 2) It's also desirable because it makes the
|
||||
// degeneralization idempotent (up to a renaming of
|
||||
// states). Consider the following automaton where
|
||||
// 1 is initial and => marks accepting transitions:
|
||||
// 1=>1, 1=>2, 2->2, 2->1 This is already an SBA,
|
||||
// with 1 as accepting state. However if you try
|
||||
// degeralize it without ignoring *prev, you'll get
|
||||
// two copies of state 2, depending on whether we
|
||||
// reach it using 1=>2 or from 2->2. If this
|
||||
// example was not clear, uncomment the following
|
||||
// "if" block, and play with the "degenid.test"
|
||||
// test case.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 3) Ignoring all common acceptance sets would also
|
||||
// be correct, but it would make the
|
||||
// degeneralization produce larger automata in some
|
||||
// cases. The current condition to ignore only one
|
||||
// acceptance set if is this not used by the next
|
||||
// state is a heuristic that is compatible with
|
||||
// point 2) above while not causing more states to
|
||||
// be generated in our benchmark of 188 formulae
|
||||
// from the literature.
|
||||
if (!order.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned prev = order.size() - 1;
|
||||
bdd common = outgoing.common_acc(s.first);
|
||||
if (bdd_implies(order[prev], common))
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd u = outgoing.union_acc(d.first);
|
||||
if (!bdd_implies(order[prev], u))
|
||||
acc -= order[prev];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// A transition in the SLEVEL acceptance set should
|
||||
// be directed to the next acceptance set. If the
|
||||
// current transition is also in the next acceptance
|
||||
// set, then go to the one after, etc.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See Denis Oddoux's PhD thesis for a nice
|
||||
// explanation (in French).
|
||||
// @PhDThesis{ oddoux.03.phd,
|
||||
// author = {Denis Oddoux},
|
||||
// title = {Utilisation des automates alternants pour un
|
||||
// model-checking efficace des logiques
|
||||
// temporelles lin{\'e}aires.},
|
||||
// school = {Universit{\'e}e Paris 7},
|
||||
// year = {2003},
|
||||
// address= {Paris, France},
|
||||
// month = {December}
|
||||
// }
|
||||
if (is_scc_acc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If lvl_cache is used and switching SCCs, use level
|
||||
// from cache
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache && s_scc != scc
|
||||
&& lvl_cache.find(d.first) != lvl_cache.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = lvl_cache[d.first];
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Complete (or replace) the acceptance sets of
|
||||
// this link with the acceptance sets common to
|
||||
// all transitions leaving the destination state.
|
||||
if (s_scc == scc)
|
||||
acc |= otheracc;
|
||||
else
|
||||
acc = otheracc;
|
||||
|
||||
// If use_z_lvl is on, start with level zero 0 when
|
||||
// swhitching SCCs
|
||||
unsigned next = (!use_z_lvl || s_scc == scc) ? slevel : 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// If using custom acc orders, get next level for this scc
|
||||
if (use_cust_acc_orders)
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = orders.next_level(scc, next, acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Else compute level according the global acc order
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// As a heuristic, if we enter the SCC on a
|
||||
// state that has at least one accepting
|
||||
// self-loop, start the degeneralization on
|
||||
// the accepting level.
|
||||
if (s_scc != scc && acc_loop.check(d.first))
|
||||
{
|
||||
d.second = order.size();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Consider both the current acceptance
|
||||
// sets, and the acceptance sets common to
|
||||
// the outgoing transitions of the
|
||||
// destination state. But don't do
|
||||
// that if the state is accepting and we
|
||||
// are not skipping levels.
|
||||
if (skip_levels || !is_acc)
|
||||
while (next < order.size()
|
||||
&& bdd_implies(order[next], acc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
++next;
|
||||
if (!skip_levels)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
d.second = next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Have we already seen this destination?
|
||||
int dest;
|
||||
ds2num_map::const_iterator di = ds2num.find(d);
|
||||
if (di != ds2num.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
dest = di->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
dest = res->new_state();
|
||||
ds2num[d] = dest;
|
||||
todo.push_back(d);
|
||||
// Insert new state to cache
|
||||
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto res = lvl_cache.emplace(d.first, d.second);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!res.second)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (use_lvl_cache == 3)
|
||||
res.first->second =
|
||||
std::max(res.first->second, d.second);
|
||||
else if (use_lvl_cache == 2)
|
||||
res.first->second =
|
||||
std::min(res.first->second, d.second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned& t = tr_cache[dest * 2 + is_acc];
|
||||
|
||||
if (t == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Actually create the transition. If the source
|
||||
// state is accepting, we have to put degen_acc on all
|
||||
// outgoing transitions. (We are still building a
|
||||
// TGBA; we only assure that it can be used as an
|
||||
// SBA.)
|
||||
bdd acc = bddfalse;
|
||||
if (is_acc)
|
||||
acc = degen_acc;
|
||||
t = res->new_transition(src, dest,
|
||||
i->current_condition(), acc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
res->trans_data(t).cond |= i->current_condition();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
tr_cache.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef DEGEN_DEBUG
|
||||
std::vector<bdd>::iterator i;
|
||||
std::cout << "Orig. order: \t";
|
||||
for (i = order.begin(); i != order.end(); i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd_print_acc(std::cout, dict, *i);
|
||||
std::cout << ", ";
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::cout << std::endl;
|
||||
orders.print(dict);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
res->merge_transitions();
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
tgba_digraph*
|
||||
degeneralize_tba(const tgba* a, bool use_z_lvl, bool use_cust_acc_orders,
|
||||
int use_lvl_cache, bool skip_levels)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return degeneralize_aux<false>(a, use_z_lvl, use_cust_acc_orders,
|
||||
use_lvl_cache, skip_levels);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue