alarsyo/spot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix handling of 1 in trivial identities for rational operators.

Browse source 
Especially, 1&f and 1:f were mistakenly always reduced to f, which is
incorrect when f accept the empty word.

* src/ltlast/multop.cc: Here.
* src/ltlast/multop.hh, doc/tl/tl.tex: Adjust documentation.
* src/ltltest/equals.test: Add more tests.
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz 2012-04-19 18:09:20 +02:00
parent 691119c188
commit 5bea6e4950
4 changed files with 91 additions and 37 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
doc/tl/tl.tex
View file

@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ $b_1$, $b_2$ are assumed to be Boolean formul\ae.
\end{align*}
\noindent
The following rules are all valid with the two arguments swapped.
The following rules are all valid with the two arguments swapped (on input).
%(Even for the non-commutative operators \samp{$\CONCAT$} and
%\samp{$\FUSION$}.)
@ -705,10 +705,14 @@ The following rules are all valid with the two arguments swapped.
\0\OR f &\equiv f &
\0 \FUSION f &\equiv \0 &
\0 \CONCAT f &\equiv \0 \\
\1\AND f &\equiv f&
\1\ANDALT f &\equiv f &
\1\OR f &\equiv \1 &
\1 \FUSION f & \equiv f\\
\1\AND f&\equiv
\begin{cases}
1 &\mathrlap{\text{if~} \varepsilon\VDash f} \\
f &\mathrlap{\text{if~} \varepsilon\nVDash f} \\
\end{cases} &
\1\ANDALT b &\equiv b &
\1\OR b &\equiv \1 &
\1 \FUSION f & \equiv f\mathrlap{\text{~if~}\varepsilon\nVDash f}\\
\eword\AND f &\equiv f &
\eword\ANDALT f &\equiv
\begin{cases}

61
src/ltlast/multop.cc
View file

@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ namespace spot
if (op != Concat && op != Fusion)
std::sort(v->begin(), v->end(), formula_ptr_less_than());
unsigned orig_size = v->size();
formula* neutral;
formula* neutral2;
formula* abs;
@ -306,11 +308,11 @@ namespace spot
gather_bool(v, And);
break;
case AndNLM:
neutral = constant::true_instance();
neutral2 = constant::empty_word_instance();
neutral = constant::empty_word_instance();
neutral2 = 0;
abs = constant::false_instance();
abs2 = 0;
weak_abs = 0;
weak_abs = constant::true_instance();
gather_bool(v, And);
break;
case Or:
@ -388,7 +390,7 @@ namespace spot
break;
}
// Remove duplicates (except for Concat). We can't use
// Remove duplicates (except for Concat and Fusion). We can't use
// std::unique(), because we must destroy() any formula we drop.
// Also ignore neutral elements and handle absorbent elements.
{
@ -411,20 +413,21 @@ namespace spot
}
else
{
if (*i == weak_abs)
weak_abs_seen = true;
if (op != Concat) // Don't remove duplicates for Concat.
weak_abs_seen |= (*i == weak_abs);
if (op != Concat && op != Fusion) // Don't remove duplicates
last = *i;
++i;
}
}
// We have a* && [*0] && c = 0
// and a* && [*0] && c* = [*0]
// So if [*0] has been seen, check if alls term recognize the
// empty word.
if (weak_abs_seen)
{
if (op == AndRat)
{
// We have a* && [*0] && c = 0
// and a* && [*0] && c* = [*0]
// So if [*0] has been seen, check if alls term
// recognize the empty word.
bool acc_eword = true;
for (i = v->begin(); i != v->end(); ++i)
{
@ -435,7 +438,29 @@ namespace spot
if (acc_eword)
return weak_abs;
else
return constant::false_instance();
return abs;
}
else
{
// Similarly, a* & 1 & (c;d) = c;d
// a* & 1 & c* = 1
assert(op == AndNLM);
multop::vec tmp;
for (i = v->begin(); i != v->end(); ++i)
{
if (*i == weak_abs)
continue;
if ((*i)->accepts_eword())
{
(*i)->destroy();
continue;
}
tmp.push_back(*i);
}
if (tmp.empty())
tmp.push_back(weak_abs);
v->swap(tmp);
}
}
}
@ -449,11 +474,21 @@ namespace spot
else if (s == 1)
{
// Simply replace Multop(Op,X) by X.
// Except we should never reduce the
// arguments of a Fusion operator to
// a list with a single formula that
// accepts [*0].
formula* res = (*v)[0];
if (op != Fusion || orig_size == 1
|| !res->accepts_eword())
{
delete v;
return res;
}
// If Fusion(f, ...) reduce to Fusion(f), emit Fusion(1,f).
// to ensure that [*0] is not accepted.
v->insert(v->begin(), constant::true_instance());
}
// The hash key.
pair p(op, v);

24
src/ltlast/multop.hh
View file

@ -84,27 +84,31 @@ namespace spot
/// - And(Exps1...,1,Exps2...) = And(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - And(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - And(Exp) = Exp
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,BoolExp1,Exps2...,BoolExps2...) =
/// AndRat(Exps1...,Exps2...,And(BoolExp1,BoolExps2...))
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = [*0] if all Expi accept [*0]
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = 0 if some Expi reject [*0]
/// - AndNLM(Exps1...,1,Exps2...) = AndNLM(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - Or(Exps1...,1,Exps2...) = 1
/// - Or(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = Or(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - Or(Exp) = Exp
/// - AndNLM(FExps1...,1,Exps2...) = AndNLM(Exps2...)
/// if Fexps1... accept [*0], and Exps2... don't.
/// - AndNLM(FExps1...,1,FExps2...) = 1
/// if Fexps1...,FExps2... all accept[*0].
/// - AndNLM(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - AndNLM(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = AndNLM(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - AndNLM(Exp) = Exp
/// - AndNLM(Exps1...,BoolExp1,Exps2...,BoolExp2,Exps3...) =
/// AndNLM(Exps1...,Exps2...,Exps3...,And(BoolExp1,BoolExp2))
/// - Or(Exps1...,1,Exps2...) = 1
/// - Or(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = Or(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - Or(Exp) = Exp
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,BoolExp1,Exps2...,BoolExps2...) =
/// AndRat(Exps1...,Exps2...,And(BoolExp1,BoolExps2...))
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = [*0] if all Expi accept [*0]
/// - AndRat(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = 0 if some Expi reject [*0]
/// - OrRat(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = OrRat(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - OrRat(Exps1...,BoolExp1,Exps2...,BoolExps2...) =
/// OrRat(Exps1...,Exps2...,Or(BoolExp1,BoolExps2...))
/// - Concat(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - Concat(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = Concat(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - Concat(Exp) = Exp
/// - Fusion(Exps1...,1,Exps2...) = Concat(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// - Fusion(Exps1...1,Exps2...) = Fusion(Exps1...,Exps2...)
/// if at least one exp reject [*0]
/// - Fusion(Exps1...,0,Exps2...) = 0
/// - Fusion(Exps1...,[*0],Exps2...) = 0
/// - Fusion(Exp) = Exp

11
src/ltltest/equals.test
View file

@ -149,6 +149,17 @@ run 0 ../equals '{{a;b}:b:c:d*:e:f}!' '{{a;b}:{b && c }:d[*]:{e && f}}!'
run 0 ../equals '{a:b:c}|->!Xb' '!(a&&b&&c) | !Xb'
run 0 ../equals '{a:b:c*}|->!Xb' '{(a&&b):c*}|-> !Xb'
run 0 ../equals '{a&b&c*}|->!Xb' '{(a&&b)&c*}|-> !Xb'
run 0 ../equals '{0&{f;g*}}!' '0'
run 0 ../equals '{1&{f;g*}}!' '{f;g*}!'
# 1 should not be removed in the following two formulae
run 1 ../equals '{1&{g*}}!' '{g*}!'
run 1 ../equals '{1|{b;c}}<>->a' '{b;c}<>->a'
run 0 ../equals '{1:{a;b}:1:c*}!' '{{a;b}:c*}!'
run 0 ../equals '{c*:1:{a;b}:1}!' '{c*:{a;b}}!'
# make sure twin arguments are not reduced in Fusion.
run 1 ../equals '{(a;!a)*:(a;!a)*:b}!' '{(a;!a)*:b}!'
# make sure 1:a* is not reduced to a*.
run 1 ../equals '{(1:a*);b}!' '{a*;b}!'
run 0 ../equals '{a[*0]}' '{[*0]}'
run 0 ../equals '{a[*..]}' '{a[*]}'