Massage the AST so that identical sub-formula share the same
reference-counted formula*. One can't call constructors for AST items anymore, everything need to be acquired through instance() class methods. * src/ltlast/formula.cc, src/ltlast/refformula.cc, src/ltlast/refformula.hh: New files. * src/ltlast/Makefile.am (libltlast_la_SOURCES): Add them. * src/ltlast/atomic_prop.cc, src/ltlast/atomic_prop.hh, src/ltlast/unop.cc, src/ltlast/unop.hh, src/ltlast/binop.cc, src/ltlast/binop.hh: Make the constructor and destructor protected. Define a static function `instance()' to get an instance with specific argument. Use a map called `instances' to store all known instances. Inherit from ref_formula. * src/ltlast/constant.hh, src/ltlast/constant.cc: Protect the constructor and destructor. Provide the false_instance() and true_instance() functions instead. * src/formula.hh (ref, unref, ref_, unref_): New methods. * src/ltlast/multop.cc, src/ltlast/multop.hh: Protect the constructor, destructor, as well as the add() method. Provides the instance(), and add() class methods instead. Store children_ as a pointer. * src/ltlenv/defaultenv.cc (require): Adjust to call atomic_prop::instance. * src/ltlparse/ltlparse.yy: Adjust to call instance() functions instead of constructors. * src/ltltest/Makefile.am (LDADD): Tweak library ordering. * src/ltlvisit/clone.hh (clone_visitor): Inherit from visitor, not const_visitor, and adjust all prototypes appropriately. * src/ltlvisit/clone.cc (clone_visitor): Likewise. Call ref() or instance() methods instead of copy constructors. * src/ltlvisit/equals.cc: Simplify atomic_prop and constant cases. * src/ltlvisit/lunabbrev.hh, src/ltlvisit/lunabbrev.cc, src/ltlvisit/tunabbrev.hh, src/ltlvisit/tunabbrev.cc, src/ltlvisit/nenoform.hh, src/ltlvisit/nenoform.cc: Use instance() methods instead of constructor. Make these children of visitor, not const_visitor. * src/ltltest/readltl.c (main): Do not delete the formula.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1838ab8ef
commit
5f6d8b6234
29 changed files with 548 additions and 253 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/allnodes.hh"
|
||||
#include "clone.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,52 +18,52 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
return result_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(const atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = new atomic_prop(ap->name(), ap->env());
|
||||
result_ = ap->ref();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(const constant* c)
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(constant* c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = new constant(c->val());
|
||||
result_ = c->ref();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(const unop* uo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(unop* uo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = new unop(uo->op(), recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
result_ = unop::instance(uo->op(), recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(const binop* bo)
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(binop* bo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = new binop(bo->op(),
|
||||
recurse(bo->first()), recurse(bo->second()));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(bo->op(),
|
||||
recurse(bo->first()), recurse(bo->second()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(const multop* mo)
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
clone_visitor::visit(multop* mo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
multop* res = new multop(mo->op());
|
||||
multop* res = multop::instance(mo->op());
|
||||
unsigned mos = mo->size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < mos; ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
res->add(recurse(mo->nth(i)));
|
||||
multop::add(&res, recurse(mo->nth(i)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
result_ = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
clone_visitor::recurse(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
clone_visitor::recurse(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return clone(f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
clone(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
clone(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
clone_visitor v;
|
||||
f->accept(v);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/formula.hh"
|
||||
#include "ltlast/visitor.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,28 +14,28 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// to derive from it and override part of its methods.
|
||||
/// But if you just want the functionality, consider using
|
||||
/// spot::ltl::clone instead.
|
||||
class clone_visitor : public const_visitor
|
||||
class clone_visitor : public visitor
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
clone_visitor();
|
||||
virtual ~clone_visitor();
|
||||
|
||||
formula* result() const;
|
||||
|
||||
void visit(const atomic_prop* ap);
|
||||
void visit(const unop* uo);
|
||||
void visit(const binop* bo);
|
||||
void visit(const multop* mo);
|
||||
void visit(const constant* c);
|
||||
|
||||
virtual formula* recurse(const formula* f);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void visit(atomic_prop* ap);
|
||||
void visit(unop* uo);
|
||||
void visit(binop* bo);
|
||||
void visit(multop* mo);
|
||||
void visit(constant* c);
|
||||
|
||||
virtual formula* recurse(formula* f);
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
formula* result_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Clone a formula.
|
||||
formula* clone(const formula* f);
|
||||
formula* clone(formula* f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
#include "equals.hh"
|
||||
#include "ltlast/allnodes.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,26 +15,22 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
bool
|
||||
equals_visitor::result() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return result_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
equals_visitor::visit(const atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const atomic_prop* p = dynamic_cast<const atomic_prop*>(f_);
|
||||
if (p && p->name() == ap->name())
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
result_ = f_ == ap;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
equals_visitor::visit(const constant* c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const constant* p = dynamic_cast<const constant*>(f_);
|
||||
if (p && p->val() == c->val())
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
result_ = f_ == c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,34 +49,34 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const binop* p = dynamic_cast<const binop*>(f_);
|
||||
if (!p || p->op() != bo->op())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// The current visitor will descend the left branch.
|
||||
// Build a second visitor for the right branch.
|
||||
equals_visitor v2(p->second());
|
||||
f_ = p->first();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bo->first()->accept(*this);
|
||||
if (result_ == false)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bo->second()->accept(v2);
|
||||
result_ = v2.result();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
equals_visitor::visit(const multop* m)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const multop* p = dynamic_cast<const multop*>(f_);
|
||||
if (!p || p->op() != m->op())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// This check is a bit more complicated than other checks
|
||||
// because And(a, b, c) is equal to And(c, a, b, a).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned m_size = m->size();
|
||||
unsigned p_size = p->size();
|
||||
std::vector<bool> p_seen(p_size, false);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned nf = 0; nf < m_size; ++nf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned np;
|
||||
|
|
@ -102,7 +98,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// of `p'. That doesn't means that both formula are equal.
|
||||
// Condider m = And(a, b, c) against p = And(c, d, a, b).
|
||||
// We should now check if any unmarked (accodring to p_seen)
|
||||
// child of `p' has an counterpart in `m'. Because `m' might
|
||||
// child of `p' has an counterpart in `m'. Because `m' might
|
||||
// contain duplicate children, its faster to test that
|
||||
// unmarked children of `p' have a counterpart in marked children
|
||||
// of `p'.
|
||||
|
|
@ -111,25 +107,25 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// Consider only unmarked children.
|
||||
if (p_seen[np])
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Compare with marked children.
|
||||
unsigned np2;
|
||||
const formula *pnth = p->nth(np);
|
||||
for (np2 = 0; np2 < p_size; ++np2)
|
||||
if (p_seen[np2] && equals(p->nth(np2), pnth))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// No match? Too bad.
|
||||
if (np2 == p_size)
|
||||
if (np2 == p_size)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// The two formulas match.
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
bool
|
||||
equals(const formula* f1, const formula* f2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
equals_visitor v(f1);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/allnodes.hh"
|
||||
#include "lunabbrev.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic_visitor::visit(const binop* bo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic_visitor::visit(binop* bo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
formula* f1 = recurse(bo->first());
|
||||
formula* f2 = recurse(bo->second());
|
||||
|
|
@ -22,43 +22,48 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
/* f1 ^ f2 == (f1 & !f2) | (f2 & !f1) */
|
||||
case binop::Xor:
|
||||
result_ = new multop(multop::Or,
|
||||
new multop(multop::And, f1,
|
||||
new unop(unop::Not, f2)),
|
||||
new multop(multop::And, f2,
|
||||
new unop(unop::Not, f1)));
|
||||
result_ = multop::instance(multop::Or,
|
||||
multop::instance(multop::And, f1,
|
||||
unop::instance(unop::Not,
|
||||
f2)),
|
||||
multop::instance(multop::And, f2,
|
||||
unop::instance(unop::Not,
|
||||
f1)));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* f1 => f2 == !f1 | f2 */
|
||||
case binop::Implies:
|
||||
result_ = new multop(multop::Or, new unop(unop::Not, f1), f2);
|
||||
result_ = multop::instance(multop::Or,
|
||||
unop::instance(unop::Not, f1), f2);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* f1 <=> f2 == (f1 & f2) | (!f1 & !f2) */
|
||||
case binop::Equiv:
|
||||
result_ = new multop(multop::Or,
|
||||
new multop(multop::And, f1, f2),
|
||||
new multop(multop::And,
|
||||
new unop(unop::Not, f1),
|
||||
new unop(unop::Not, f2)));
|
||||
result_ = multop::instance(multop::Or,
|
||||
multop::instance(multop::And, f1, f2),
|
||||
multop::instance(multop::And,
|
||||
unop::instance(unop::Not,
|
||||
f1),
|
||||
unop::instance(unop::Not,
|
||||
f2)));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* f1 U f2 == f1 U f2 */
|
||||
/* f1 R f2 == f1 R f2 */
|
||||
case binop::U:
|
||||
case binop::R:
|
||||
result_ = new binop(bo->op(), f1, f2);
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(bo->op(), f1, f2);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Unreachable code. */
|
||||
assert(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic_visitor::recurse(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic_visitor::recurse(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return unabbreviate_logic(f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unabbreviate_logic_visitor v;
|
||||
f->accept(v);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include "clone.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// abbreviated logical operators.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This will rewrite binary operators such as binop::Implies,
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,18 +26,18 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
virtual ~unabbreviate_logic_visitor();
|
||||
|
||||
using super::visit;
|
||||
void visit(const binop* bo);
|
||||
void visit(binop* bo);
|
||||
|
||||
virtual formula* recurse(const formula* f);
|
||||
virtual formula* recurse(formula* f);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Clone rewrite a formula to remove most of the abbreviated
|
||||
/// \brief Clone rewrite a formula to remove most of the abbreviated
|
||||
/// logical operators.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This will rewrite binary operators such as binop::Implies,
|
||||
/// binop::Equals, and binop::Xor, using only unop::Not, multop::Or,
|
||||
/// and multop::And.
|
||||
formula* unabbreviate_logic(const formula* f);
|
||||
formula* unabbreviate_logic(formula* f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
class negative_normal_form_visitor : public const_visitor
|
||||
class negative_normal_form_visitor : public visitor
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
negative_normal_form_visitor(bool negated)
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
virtual
|
||||
virtual
|
||||
~negative_normal_form_visitor()
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,43 +23,43 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
return result_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
formula* f = new atomic_prop(ap->name(), ap->env());
|
||||
formula* f = ap->ref();
|
||||
if (negated_)
|
||||
result_ = new unop(unop::Not, f);
|
||||
result_ = unop::instance(unop::Not, f);
|
||||
else
|
||||
result_ = f;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const constant* c)
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(constant* c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (! negated_)
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = new constant(c->val());
|
||||
result_ = c;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (c->val())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case constant::True:
|
||||
result_ = new constant(constant::False);
|
||||
result_ = constant::false_instance();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case constant::False:
|
||||
result_ = new constant(constant::True);
|
||||
result_ = constant::true_instance();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Unreachable code. */
|
||||
assert(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const unop* uo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(unop* uo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const formula* f = uo->child();
|
||||
formula* f = uo->child();
|
||||
switch (uo->op())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case unop::Not:
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,63 +67,67 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return;
|
||||
case unop::X:
|
||||
/* !Xa == X!a */
|
||||
result_ = new unop(unop::X, recurse(f));
|
||||
result_ = unop::instance(unop::X, recurse(f));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::F:
|
||||
/* !Fa == G!a */
|
||||
result_ = new unop(negated_ ? unop::G : unop::F, recurse(f));
|
||||
result_ = unop::instance(negated_ ? unop::G : unop::F, recurse(f));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::G:
|
||||
/* !Ga == F!a */
|
||||
result_ = new unop(negated_ ? unop::F : unop::G, recurse(f));
|
||||
result_ = unop::instance(negated_ ? unop::F : unop::G, recurse(f));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Unreachable code. */
|
||||
assert(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const binop* bo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(binop* bo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const formula* f1 = bo->first();
|
||||
const formula* f2 = bo->second();
|
||||
formula* f1 = bo->first();
|
||||
formula* f2 = bo->second();
|
||||
switch (bo->op())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case binop::Xor:
|
||||
/* !(a ^ b) == a <=> b */
|
||||
result_ = new binop(negated_ ? binop::Equiv : binop::Xor,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false), recurse_(f2, false));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(negated_ ? binop::Equiv : binop::Xor,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false),
|
||||
recurse_(f2, false));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::Equiv:
|
||||
/* !(a <=> b) == a ^ b */
|
||||
result_ = new binop(negated_ ? binop::Xor : binop::Equiv,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false), recurse_(f2, false));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(negated_ ? binop::Xor : binop::Equiv,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false),
|
||||
recurse_(f2, false));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::Implies:
|
||||
if (negated_)
|
||||
/* !(a => b) == a & !b */
|
||||
result_ = new multop(multop::And,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false), recurse_(f2, true));
|
||||
result_ = multop::instance(multop::And,
|
||||
recurse_(f1, false),
|
||||
recurse_(f2, true));
|
||||
else
|
||||
result_ = new binop(binop::Implies, recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(binop::Implies,
|
||||
recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::U:
|
||||
/* !(a U b) == !a R !b */
|
||||
result_ = new binop(negated_ ? binop::R : binop::U,
|
||||
recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(negated_ ? binop::R : binop::U,
|
||||
recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::R:
|
||||
/* !(a R b) == !a U !b */
|
||||
result_ = new binop(negated_ ? binop::U : binop::R,
|
||||
recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(negated_ ? binop::U : binop::R,
|
||||
recurse(f1), recurse(f2));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Unreachable code. */
|
||||
assert(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const multop* mo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(multop* mo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* !(a & b & c) == !a | !b | !c */
|
||||
/* !(a | b | c) == !a & !b & !c */
|
||||
|
|
@ -138,32 +142,32 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
op = multop::And;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
multop* res = new multop(op);
|
||||
multop* res = multop::instance(op);
|
||||
unsigned mos = mo->size();
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < mos; ++i)
|
||||
res->add(recurse(mo->nth(i)));
|
||||
multop::add(&res, recurse(mo->nth(i)));
|
||||
result_ = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
recurse_(const formula* f, bool negated)
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
recurse_(formula* f, bool negated)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return negative_normal_form(f, negated);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
recurse(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
recurse(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return recurse_(f, negated_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
formula* result_;
|
||||
bool negated_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
negative_normal_form(const formula* f, bool negated)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
negative_normal_form(formula* f, bool negated)
|
||||
{
|
||||
negative_normal_form_visitor v(negated);
|
||||
f->accept(v);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,13 +4,13 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/formula.hh"
|
||||
#include "ltlast/visitor.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// \brief Build the negative normal form of \a f.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// All negations of the formula are pushed in front of the
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// All negations of the formula are pushed in front of the
|
||||
/// atomic propositions.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param f The formula to normalize.
|
||||
|
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// or spot::ltl::unabbreviate_ltl first. (Calling these functions
|
||||
/// after spot::ltl::negative_normal_form would likely produce a
|
||||
/// formula which is not in negative normal form.)
|
||||
formula* negative_normal_form(const formula* f, bool negated = false);
|
||||
formula* negative_normal_form(formula* f, bool negated = false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/allnodes.hh"
|
||||
#include "tunabbrev.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor::visit(const unop* uo)
|
||||
void
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor::visit(unop* uo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (uo->op())
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,26 +23,26 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
this->super::visit(uo);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::F:
|
||||
result_ = new binop(binop::U,
|
||||
new constant(constant::True),
|
||||
recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(binop::U,
|
||||
constant::true_instance(),
|
||||
recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::G:
|
||||
result_ = new binop(binop::R,
|
||||
new constant(constant::False),
|
||||
recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
result_ = binop::instance(binop::R,
|
||||
constant::false_instance(),
|
||||
recurse(uo->child()));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor::recurse(const formula* f)
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor::recurse(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return unabbreviate_ltl(f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl(const formula* f)
|
||||
formula*
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl(formula* f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor v;
|
||||
f->accept(v);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
|
|||
#include "ltlast/formula.hh"
|
||||
#include "ltlvisit/lunabbrev.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace ltl
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// abbreviated LTL and logical operators.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The rewriting performed on logical operator is
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
unabbreviate_ltl_visitor();
|
||||
virtual ~unabbreviate_ltl_visitor();
|
||||
|
||||
void visit(const unop* uo);
|
||||
void visit(unop* uo);
|
||||
|
||||
formula* recurse(const formula* f);
|
||||
formula* recurse(formula* f);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// \brief Clone and rewrite a formula to remove most of the
|
||||
/// abbreviated LTL and logical operators.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The rewriting performed on logical operator is
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// This will also rewrite unary operators such as unop::F,
|
||||
/// and unop::G, using only binop::U, and binop::R.
|
||||
formula* unabbreviate_ltl(const formula* f);
|
||||
formula* unabbreviate_ltl(formula* f);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue