Introduce an emptiness-check interface, and modify the existing
algorithms to conform to it, uniformly. This will unfortunately break third-party code that were using these algorithms. * src/tgbaalgos/emptiness.cc, src/tgbaalgos/emptiness.hh: New files. * src/tgbaalgos/Makefile.am: New files. * src/tgbaalgos/magic.cc, src/tgbaalgos/magic.hh: Adjust to conform to the new emptiness-check interface. * src/tgbaalgos/gtec/ce.cc, src/tgbaalgos/gtec/ce.hh, src/tgbaalgos/gtec/gtec.cc, src/tgbaalgos/gtec/gtec.hh, src/tgbaalgos/gtec/status.cc, src/tgbaalgos/gtec/status.hh: Likewise. The classes have been renamed are as following emptiness_check -> couvreur99_check emptiness_check_shy -> couvreur99_check_shy counter_example -> couvreur99_check_result * src/tgbatest/ltl2tgba.cc, iface/gspn/ltlgspn.cc, iface/gspn/ssp.hh, iface/gspn/ssp.cc: Adjust to renaming and new interface.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7010a02cd9
commit
6c815004c4
16 changed files with 523 additions and 300 deletions
|
|
@ -28,15 +28,22 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
typedef std::pair<const spot::state*, tgba_succ_iterator*> pair_state_iter;
|
||||
typedef std::pair<const state*, bdd> state_proposition;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
counter_example::counter_example(const emptiness_check_status* ecs,
|
||||
const explicit_connected_component_factory*
|
||||
eccf)
|
||||
: ecs_(ecs)
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result::couvreur99_check_result
|
||||
(const couvreur99_check_status* ecs,
|
||||
const explicit_connected_component_factory* eccf)
|
||||
: ecs_(ecs), eccf_(eccf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tgba_run*
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result::accepting_run()
|
||||
{
|
||||
run_ = new tgba_run;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(!ecs_->root.empty());
|
||||
assert(suffix.empty());
|
||||
|
||||
scc_stack::stack_type root = ecs_->root.s;
|
||||
int comp_size = root.size();
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,7 +52,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
new explicit_connected_component*[comp_size];
|
||||
for (int j = comp_size - 1; 0 <= j; --j)
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc[j] = eccf->build();
|
||||
scc[j] = eccf_->build();
|
||||
scc[j]->index = root.top().index;
|
||||
scc[j]->condition = root.top().condition;
|
||||
root.pop();
|
||||
|
|
@ -74,7 +81,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
numbered_state_heap::state_index_p spi =
|
||||
ecs_->h->index(ecs_->aut->get_init_state());
|
||||
assert(spi.first);
|
||||
suffix.push_front(spi.first);
|
||||
/// FIXME: Should compute label and acceptance condition.
|
||||
tgba_run::step s = { spi.first, bddtrue, bddfalse };
|
||||
run_->prefix.push_front(s);
|
||||
|
||||
// We build a path trough each SCC in the stack. For the
|
||||
// first SCC, the starting state is the initial state of the
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,7 +102,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
father_map father;
|
||||
|
||||
// Initial state of the BFS.
|
||||
const state* start = suffix.back();
|
||||
const state* start = run_->prefix.back().s;
|
||||
{
|
||||
tgba_succ_iterator* i = ecs_->aut->succ_iter(start);
|
||||
todo.push_back(pair_state_iter(start, i));
|
||||
|
|
@ -114,20 +123,26 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
if (!h_dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If we have found a state in the next SCC.
|
||||
// Unwind the path and populate SUFFIX.
|
||||
// Unwind the path and populate RUN_->PREFIX.
|
||||
h_dest = scc[k+1]->has_state(dest);
|
||||
if (h_dest)
|
||||
{
|
||||
state_sequence seq;
|
||||
tgba_run::steps seq;
|
||||
|
||||
seq.push_front(h_dest);
|
||||
/// FIXME: Should compute label and acceptance
|
||||
/// condition.
|
||||
tgba_run::step s = { h_dest, bddtrue, bddfalse };
|
||||
seq.push_front(s);
|
||||
while (src->compare(start))
|
||||
{
|
||||
seq.push_front(src);
|
||||
/// FIXME: Should compute label and acceptance
|
||||
/// condition.
|
||||
tgba_run::step s = { h_dest, bddtrue, bddfalse };
|
||||
seq.push_front(s);
|
||||
src = father[src];
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Append SEQ to SUFFIX.
|
||||
suffix.splice(suffix.end(), seq);
|
||||
// Append SEQ to RUN_->PREFIX.
|
||||
run_->prefix.splice(run_->prefix.end(), seq);
|
||||
// Exit this BFS for this SCC.
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -152,24 +167,37 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
accepting_path(scc[comp_size - 1], suffix.back(),
|
||||
accepting_path(scc[comp_size - 1], run_->prefix.back().s,
|
||||
scc[comp_size - 1]->condition);
|
||||
|
||||
run_->prefix.pop_back(); // this state belongs to the cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
for (int j = comp_size - 1; 0 <= j; --j)
|
||||
delete scc[j];
|
||||
delete[] scc;
|
||||
|
||||
// Clone every state in the run before returning it. (We didn't
|
||||
// do that before in the algorithm, because it's easier to follow
|
||||
// if every state manipulated is the instance in the hash table.)
|
||||
for (tgba_run::steps::iterator i = run_->prefix.begin();
|
||||
i != run_->prefix.end(); ++i)
|
||||
i->s = i->s->clone();
|
||||
for (tgba_run::steps::iterator i = run_->cycle.begin();
|
||||
i != run_->cycle.end(); ++i)
|
||||
i->s = i->s->clone();
|
||||
|
||||
return run_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
counter_example::complete_cycle(const explicit_connected_component* scc,
|
||||
const state* from,
|
||||
const state* to)
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result::complete_cycle(const explicit_connected_component*
|
||||
scc,
|
||||
const state* from,
|
||||
const state* to)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// If by change or period already ends on the state we have
|
||||
// If by chance our cycle already ends on the state we have
|
||||
// to reach back, we are done.
|
||||
if (from == to
|
||||
&& !period.empty())
|
||||
&& !run_->cycle.empty())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// Records backlinks to parent state during the BFS.
|
||||
|
|
@ -207,18 +235,22 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
bdd cond = i->current_condition();
|
||||
|
||||
// If we have reached our destination, unwind the path
|
||||
// and populate PERIOD.
|
||||
// and populate RUN_->CYCLE.
|
||||
if (h_dest == to)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cycle_path p;
|
||||
p.push_front(state_proposition(h_dest, cond));
|
||||
tgba_run::steps p;
|
||||
// FIXME: should compute acceptance condition.
|
||||
tgba_run::step s = { h_dest, cond, bddfalse };
|
||||
p.push_front(s);
|
||||
while (src != from)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const state_proposition& psi = father[src];
|
||||
p.push_front(state_proposition(src, psi.second));
|
||||
// FIXME: should compute acceptance condition.
|
||||
tgba_run::step s = { src, psi.second, bddfalse };
|
||||
p.push_front(s);
|
||||
src = psi.first;
|
||||
}
|
||||
period.splice(period.end(), p);
|
||||
run_->cycle.splice(run_->cycle.end(), p);
|
||||
|
||||
// Exit the BFS, but release all iterators first.
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
|
|
@ -257,8 +289,10 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
counter_example::accepting_path(const explicit_connected_component* scc,
|
||||
const state* start, bdd acc_to_traverse)
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result::accepting_path(const explicit_connected_component*
|
||||
scc,
|
||||
const state* start, bdd
|
||||
acc_to_traverse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// State seen during the DFS.
|
||||
typedef Sgi::hash_set<const state*,
|
||||
|
|
@ -278,9 +312,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The path being explored currently.
|
||||
cycle_path path;
|
||||
tgba_run::steps path;
|
||||
// The best path seen so far.
|
||||
cycle_path best_path;
|
||||
tgba_run::steps best_path;
|
||||
// The acceptance conditions traversed by BEST_PATH.
|
||||
bdd best_acc = bddfalse;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -314,8 +348,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bdd acc = iter->current_acceptance_conditions() | todo.top().acc;
|
||||
path.push_back(state_proposition(h_dest,
|
||||
iter->current_condition()));
|
||||
tgba_run::step st = { h_dest, iter->current_condition(),
|
||||
iter->current_acceptance_conditions() };
|
||||
path.push_back(st);
|
||||
|
||||
// Advance iterator for next step.
|
||||
iter->next();
|
||||
|
|
@ -377,71 +412,30 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
path.pop_back();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Append our best path to the period.
|
||||
for (cycle_path::iterator it = best_path.begin();
|
||||
// Append our best path to the run_->cycle.
|
||||
for (tgba_run::steps::iterator it = best_path.begin();
|
||||
it != best_path.end(); ++it)
|
||||
period.push_back(*it);
|
||||
run_->cycle.push_back(*it);
|
||||
|
||||
// Prepare to find another path for the remaining acceptance
|
||||
// conditions.
|
||||
acc_to_traverse -= best_acc;
|
||||
start = period.back().first;
|
||||
start = run_->cycle.back().s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Complete the path so that it goes back to its beginning,
|
||||
// forming a cycle.
|
||||
complete_cycle(scc, start, suffix.back());
|
||||
complete_cycle(scc, start, run_->prefix.back().s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::ostream&
|
||||
counter_example::print_result(std::ostream& os, const tgba* restrict) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << "Prefix:" << std::endl;
|
||||
const bdd_dict* d = ecs_->aut->get_dict();
|
||||
for (state_sequence::const_iterator i_se = suffix.begin();
|
||||
i_se != suffix.end(); ++i_se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << " ";
|
||||
if (restrict)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const state* s = ecs_->aut->project_state(*i_se, restrict);
|
||||
assert(s);
|
||||
os << restrict->format_state(s) << std::endl;
|
||||
delete s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << ecs_->aut->format_state(*i_se) << std::endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
os << "Cycle:" <<std::endl;
|
||||
for (cycle_path::const_iterator it = period.begin();
|
||||
it != period.end(); ++it)
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << " | " << bdd_format_set(d, it->second) << std::endl;
|
||||
os << " ";
|
||||
if (restrict)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const state* s = ecs_->aut->project_state(it->first, restrict);
|
||||
assert(s);
|
||||
os << restrict->format_state(s) << std::endl;
|
||||
delete s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << ecs_->aut->format_state(it->first) << std::endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return os;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
counter_example::print_stats(std::ostream& os) const
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result::print_stats(std::ostream& os) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
ecs_->print_stats(os);
|
||||
os << suffix.size() << " states in suffix" << std::endl;
|
||||
os << period.size() << " states in period" << std::endl;
|
||||
// FIXME: This is bogusly assuming run_ exists. (Even if we
|
||||
// created it, the user might have delete it.)
|
||||
os << run_->prefix.size() << " states in run_->prefix" << std::endl;
|
||||
os << run_->cycle.size() << " states in run_->cycle" << std::endl;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,35 +24,26 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#include "status.hh"
|
||||
#include "explscc.hh"
|
||||
#include "tgbaalgos/emptiness.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// Compute a counter example from a spot::emptiness_check_status
|
||||
class counter_example
|
||||
/// Compute a counter example from a spot::couvreur99_check_status
|
||||
class couvreur99_check_result: public emptiness_check_result
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
counter_example(const emptiness_check_status* ecs,
|
||||
const explicit_connected_component_factory*
|
||||
eccf = connected_component_hash_set_factory::instance());
|
||||
couvreur99_check_result(const couvreur99_check_status* ecs,
|
||||
const explicit_connected_component_factory*
|
||||
eccf =
|
||||
connected_component_hash_set_factory::instance());
|
||||
|
||||
typedef std::pair<const state*, bdd> state_proposition;
|
||||
typedef std::list<const state*> state_sequence;
|
||||
typedef std::list<state_proposition> cycle_path;
|
||||
state_sequence suffix;
|
||||
cycle_path period;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Display the example computed by counter_example().
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param os the output stream
|
||||
/// \param restrict optional automaton to project the example on.
|
||||
std::ostream& print_result(std::ostream& os,
|
||||
const tgba* restrict = 0) const;
|
||||
virtual tgba_run* accepting_run();
|
||||
|
||||
/// Output statistics about this object.
|
||||
void print_stats(std::ostream& os) const;
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
/// Called by counter_example to find a path which traverses all
|
||||
/// Called by couvreur99_check_result to find a path which traverses all
|
||||
/// acceptance conditions in the accepted SCC.
|
||||
void accepting_path (const explicit_connected_component* scc,
|
||||
const state* start, bdd acc_to_traverse);
|
||||
|
|
@ -63,7 +54,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const state* from, const state* to);
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
const emptiness_check_status* ecs_;
|
||||
const couvreur99_check_status* ecs_;
|
||||
const explicit_connected_component_factory* eccf_;
|
||||
tgba_run* run_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
|
|||
// 02111-1307, USA.
|
||||
|
||||
#include "gtec.hh"
|
||||
#include "ce.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -28,19 +29,19 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
typedef std::pair<const spot::state*, tgba_succ_iterator*> pair_state_iter;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
emptiness_check::emptiness_check(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf)
|
||||
couvreur99_check::couvreur99_check(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ecs_ = new emptiness_check_status(a, nshf);
|
||||
ecs_ = new couvreur99_check_status(a, nshf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
emptiness_check::~emptiness_check()
|
||||
couvreur99_check::~couvreur99_check()
|
||||
{
|
||||
delete ecs_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
emptiness_check::remove_component(const state* from)
|
||||
couvreur99_check::remove_component(const state* from)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Remove from H all states which are reachable from state FROM.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,12 +88,12 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
emptiness_check::check()
|
||||
emptiness_check_result*
|
||||
couvreur99_check::check()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// We use five main data in this algorithm:
|
||||
// * emptiness_check::root, a stack of strongly connected components (SCC),
|
||||
// * emptiness_check::h, a hash of all visited nodes, with their order,
|
||||
// * couvreur99_check::root, a stack of strongly connected components (SCC),
|
||||
// * couvreur99_check::h, a hash of all visited nodes, with their order,
|
||||
// (it is called "Hash" in Couvreur's paper)
|
||||
// * arc, a stack of acceptance conditions between each of these SCC,
|
||||
std::stack<bdd> arc;
|
||||
|
|
@ -220,25 +221,25 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
delete todo.top().second;
|
||||
todo.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return new couvreur99_check_result(ecs_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// This automaton recognizes no word.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const emptiness_check_status*
|
||||
emptiness_check::result() const
|
||||
const couvreur99_check_status*
|
||||
couvreur99_check::result() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ecs_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
|
||||
emptiness_check_shy::emptiness_check_shy(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory*
|
||||
nshf)
|
||||
: emptiness_check(a, nshf), num(1)
|
||||
couvreur99_check_shy::couvreur99_check_shy(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory*
|
||||
nshf)
|
||||
: couvreur99_check(a, nshf), num(1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Setup depth-first search from the initial state.
|
||||
todo.push(pair_state_successors(0, succ_queue()));
|
||||
|
|
@ -246,12 +247,12 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
ecs_->aut->get_init_state()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
emptiness_check_shy::~emptiness_check_shy()
|
||||
couvreur99_check_shy::~couvreur99_check_shy()
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
emptiness_check_shy::check()
|
||||
emptiness_check_result*
|
||||
couvreur99_check_shy::check()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;)
|
||||
|
|
@ -336,7 +337,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
todo.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return new couvreur99_check_result(ecs_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Remove that state from the queue, so we do not
|
||||
|
|
@ -354,7 +355,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
todo.pop();
|
||||
if (todo.empty())
|
||||
// This automaton recognizes no word.
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// When backtracking the root of an SCC, we must also
|
||||
// remove that SCC from the ARC/ROOT stacks. We must
|
||||
|
|
@ -393,7 +394,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int*
|
||||
emptiness_check_shy::find_state(const state* s)
|
||||
couvreur99_check_shy::find_state(const state* s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ecs_->h->find(s).second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
|
|||
# define SPOT_TGBAALGOS_GTEC_GTEC_HH
|
||||
|
||||
#include "status.hh"
|
||||
#include "tgbaalgos/emptiness.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,32 +52,32 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// it return false, a stack of SCC has been built is available
|
||||
/// using result() (spot::counter_example needs it).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// There are two variants of this algorithm: spot::emptiness_check and
|
||||
/// spot::emptiness_check_shy. They differ in their memory usage, the
|
||||
/// There are two variants of this algorithm: spot::couvreur99_check and
|
||||
/// spot::couvreur99_check_shy. They differ in their memory usage, the
|
||||
/// number for successors computed before they are used and the way
|
||||
/// the depth first search is directed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// spot::emptiness_check performs a straightforward depth first search.
|
||||
/// spot::couvreur99_check performs a straightforward depth first search.
|
||||
/// The DFS stacks store tgba_succ_iterators, so that only the
|
||||
/// iterators which really are explored are computed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// spot::emptiness_check_shy tries to explore successors which are
|
||||
/// spot::couvreur99_check_shy tries to explore successors which are
|
||||
/// visited states first. this helps to merge SCCs and generally
|
||||
/// helps to produce shorter counter-examples. However this
|
||||
/// algorithm cannot stores unprocessed successors as
|
||||
/// tgba_succ_iterators: it must compute all successors of a state
|
||||
/// at once in order to decide which to explore first, and must keep
|
||||
/// a list of all unexplored successors in its DFS stack.
|
||||
class emptiness_check
|
||||
class couvreur99_check: public emptiness_check
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
emptiness_check(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf
|
||||
= numbered_state_heap_hash_map_factory::instance());
|
||||
virtual ~emptiness_check();
|
||||
couvreur99_check(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf
|
||||
= numbered_state_heap_hash_map_factory::instance());
|
||||
virtual ~couvreur99_check();
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check whether the automaton's language is empty.
|
||||
virtual bool check();
|
||||
virtual emptiness_check_result* check();
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Return the status of the emptiness-check.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,11 +86,11 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
///
|
||||
/// This status should not be deleted, it is a pointer
|
||||
/// to a member of this class that will be deleted when
|
||||
/// the emptiness_check object is deleted.
|
||||
const emptiness_check_status* result() const;
|
||||
/// the couvreur99 object is deleted.
|
||||
const couvreur99_check_status* result() const;
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
emptiness_check_status* ecs_;
|
||||
couvreur99_check_status* ecs_;
|
||||
/// \brief Remove a strongly component from the hash.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This function remove all accessible state from a given
|
||||
|
|
@ -98,19 +99,19 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
void remove_component(const state* start_delete);
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief A version of spot::emptiness_check that tries to visit
|
||||
/// \brief A version of spot::couvreur99_check that tries to visit
|
||||
/// known states first.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See the documentation for spot::emptiness_check
|
||||
class emptiness_check_shy : public emptiness_check
|
||||
/// See the documentation for spot::couvreur99_check
|
||||
class couvreur99_check_shy : public couvreur99_check
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
emptiness_check_shy(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf
|
||||
= numbered_state_heap_hash_map_factory::instance());
|
||||
virtual ~emptiness_check_shy();
|
||||
couvreur99_check_shy(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf
|
||||
= numbered_state_heap_hash_map_factory::instance());
|
||||
virtual ~couvreur99_check_shy();
|
||||
|
||||
virtual bool check();
|
||||
virtual emptiness_check_result* check();
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
struct successor {
|
||||
|
|
@ -120,8 +121,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// We use five main data in this algorithm:
|
||||
// * emptiness_check::root, a stack of strongly connected components (SCC),
|
||||
// * emptiness_check::h, a hash of all visited nodes, with their order,
|
||||
// * couvreur99_check::root, a stack of strongly connected components (SCC),
|
||||
// * couvreur99_check::h, a hash of all visited nodes, with their order,
|
||||
// (it is called "Hash" in Couvreur's paper)
|
||||
// * arc, a stack of acceptance conditions between each of these SCC,
|
||||
std::stack<bdd> arc;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
emptiness_check_status::emptiness_check_status
|
||||
couvreur99_check_status::couvreur99_check_status
|
||||
(const tgba* aut,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf)
|
||||
: aut(aut),
|
||||
|
|
@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
emptiness_check_status::~emptiness_check_status()
|
||||
couvreur99_check_status::~couvreur99_check_status()
|
||||
{
|
||||
delete h;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
emptiness_check_status::print_stats(std::ostream& os) const
|
||||
couvreur99_check_status::print_stats(std::ostream& os) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << h->size() << " unique states visited" << std::endl;
|
||||
os << root.size()
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// This contains everything needed to construct a counter-example:
|
||||
/// the automata, the stack of SCCs traversed by the counter-example,
|
||||
/// and the heap of visited states with their indexes.
|
||||
class emptiness_check_status
|
||||
class couvreur99_check_status
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
emptiness_check_status(const tgba* aut,
|
||||
couvreur99_check_status(const tgba* aut,
|
||||
const numbered_state_heap_factory* nshf);
|
||||
~emptiness_check_status();
|
||||
~couvreur99_check_status();
|
||||
|
||||
const tgba* aut;
|
||||
scc_stack root;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue