add a newer version of the generic emptiness check
As discussed with Jan Strejček. * spot/twa/acc.cc, spot/twa/acc.hh (fin_unit_one_split): New function. (fin_one_extract): Return the simplified acceptance condition as an optimization. * python/spot/impl.i: Bind this new function. * tests/python/acc.py: New file, to test it. * tests/Makefile.am: Add acc.py. * spot/twaalgos/genem.cc, spot/twaalgos/genem.hh: Implement the spot211 variant of the emptiness check. * tests/python/genem.py: Test it. * tests/python/acc_cond.ipynb: Adjust test for fin_one_extract.
This commit is contained in:
parent
aca6bd9042
commit
721d5695ec
9 changed files with 308 additions and 30 deletions
|
|
@ -551,6 +551,17 @@ namespace std {
|
|||
}
|
||||
%apply std::vector<unsigned> &OUTPUT {std::vector<unsigned>& pairs}
|
||||
%apply std::vector<spot::acc_cond::rs_pair> &OUTPUT {std::vector<spot::acc_cond::rs_pair>& pairs}
|
||||
// Must occur before the twa declaration
|
||||
%typemap(out) SWIGTYPE spot::acc_cond::fin_unit_one_split %{
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto& v = static_cast<const std::tuple<int, spot::acc_cond, spot::acc_cond>>($1);
|
||||
$result = PyTuple_Pack(3,
|
||||
swig::from(std::get<0>(v)),
|
||||
swig::from(std::get<1>(v)),
|
||||
swig::from(std::get<2>(v)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
%}
|
||||
|
||||
%include <spot/twa/acc.hh>
|
||||
%template(pair_bool_mark) std::pair<bool, spot::acc_cond::mark_t>;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2707,6 +2707,35 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check wheter pos looks like Fin(f) or Fin(f)&rest
|
||||
bool is_conj_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto sub = pos - pos->sub.size;
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (pos->sub.op)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
|
||||
--pos;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
|
||||
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
|
||||
if (pos[-1].mark & f)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
SPOT_FALLTHROUGH;
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
|
||||
pos -= 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (sub < pos);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code extract_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos,
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -2716,7 +2745,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
|
||||
return pos;
|
||||
return strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
|
||||
{
|
||||
--pos;
|
||||
|
|
@ -2725,7 +2754,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (uses_fin(pos, f))
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code tmp(pos);
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
|
||||
tmp |= std::move(res);
|
||||
std::swap(tmp, res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -2742,6 +2771,52 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
return {};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
|
||||
split_top_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t f)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto start = pos - pos->sub.size;
|
||||
switch (pos->sub.op)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
|
||||
if (is_conj_fin(pos, f))
|
||||
return {pos, acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
|
||||
SPOT_FALLTHROUGH;
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
|
||||
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), pos};
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
|
||||
{
|
||||
--pos;
|
||||
auto left = acc_cond::acc_code::f();
|
||||
auto right = acc_cond::acc_code::f();
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (is_conj_fin(pos, f))
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
|
||||
tmp |= std::move(left);
|
||||
std::swap(tmp, left);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code tmp(pos);
|
||||
tmp |= std::move(right);
|
||||
std::swap(tmp, right);
|
||||
}
|
||||
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (pos > start);
|
||||
return {std::move(left), std::move(right)};
|
||||
}
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
|
||||
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
|
||||
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
|
||||
}
|
||||
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
|
||||
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<int, acc_cond::acc_code>
|
||||
|
|
@ -2756,6 +2831,26 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return {selected_fin, extract_fin(pos, {(unsigned) selected_fin})};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::tuple<int, acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
|
||||
acc_cond::acc_code::fin_unit_one_split() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (SPOT_UNLIKELY(is_t() || is_f()))
|
||||
err:
|
||||
throw std::runtime_error("fin_unit_one_split(): no Fin");
|
||||
const acc_cond::acc_word* pos = &back();
|
||||
int selected_fin = has_top_fin(pos);
|
||||
if (selected_fin >= 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto [left, right] = split_top_fin(pos, {(unsigned) selected_fin});
|
||||
return {selected_fin, std::move(left), std::move(right)};
|
||||
}
|
||||
selected_fin = fin_one();
|
||||
if (selected_fin < 0)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) selected_fin};
|
||||
return {selected_fin, extract_fin(pos, fo_m), force_inf(fo_m)};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2014-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2014-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
|
||||
// de l'Epita.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
|
|||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
#include <numeric>
|
||||
#include <bddx.h>
|
||||
#include <tuple>
|
||||
#include <spot/misc/_config.h>
|
||||
#include <spot/misc/bitset.hh>
|
||||
#include <spot/misc/trival.hh>
|
||||
|
|
@ -1271,7 +1272,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
int fin_one() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Return one acceptance set i that appears as `Fin(i)`
|
||||
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it.
|
||||
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it with
|
||||
/// Fin(i) changed to true and Inf(i) to false.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct
|
||||
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then `i` will be prefered
|
||||
|
|
@ -1282,13 +1284,34 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// `Fin(i)` have been removed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For example on
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))`
|
||||
/// the output would be the pair
|
||||
/// `(1, Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`.
|
||||
/// On that example `Fin(1)` is prefered to `Fin(7)` because
|
||||
/// it appears at the top-level.
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))` the
|
||||
/// output would be the pair, we would select `Fin(1)` over
|
||||
/// `Fin(7)` because it appears at the top-level. Then we would
|
||||
/// collect the disjuncts containing `Fin(1)`, that is,
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`. Finally we would
|
||||
/// replace `Fin(1)` by true and `Inf(1)` by false. The return
|
||||
/// value would then be `(1, Inf(2)|Inf(5))`.
|
||||
std::pair<int, acc_code> fin_one_extract() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Split an acceptance condition, trying to select one
|
||||
/// unit-Fin.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct as
|
||||
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then this will return
|
||||
/// (i, left, right), where left is all disjunct of this form, and
|
||||
/// right are all the others.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the input formula has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...` then left
|
||||
/// is set to the entire formula, and right is empty.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If no disjunct has the right shape, then a random Fin(i) is
|
||||
/// searched in the formula, and the output (i, left, right).
|
||||
/// is such that left contains all disjuncts containing Fin(i)
|
||||
/// (at any depth), and right contains the original formlula
|
||||
/// where Fin(i) has been replaced by false.
|
||||
std::tuple<int, acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
|
||||
fin_unit_one_split() const;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Help closing accepting or rejecting cycle.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Assuming you have a partial cycle visiting all acceptance
|
||||
|
|
@ -2203,7 +2226,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Return one acceptance set i that appears as `Fin(i)`
|
||||
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it.
|
||||
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it with
|
||||
/// Fin(i) changed to true and Inf(i) to false.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct
|
||||
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then `i` will be prefered
|
||||
|
|
@ -2214,17 +2238,42 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// `Fin(i)` have been removed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For example on
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))`
|
||||
/// the output would be the pair
|
||||
/// `(1, Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`.
|
||||
/// On that example `Fin(1)` is prefered to `Fin(7)` because
|
||||
/// it appears at the top-level.
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))` the
|
||||
/// output would be the pair, we would select `Fin(1)` over
|
||||
/// `Fin(7)` because it appears at the top-level. Then we would
|
||||
/// collect the disjuncts containing `Fin(1)`, that is,
|
||||
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`. Finally we would
|
||||
/// replace `Fin(1)` by true and `Inf(1)` by false. The return
|
||||
/// value would then be `(1, Inf(2)|Inf(5))`.
|
||||
std::pair<int, acc_cond> fin_one_extract() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto [f, c] = code_.fin_one_extract();
|
||||
return {f, {num_sets(), std::move(c)}};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Split an acceptance condition, trying to select one
|
||||
/// unit-Fin.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct as
|
||||
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then this will return
|
||||
/// (i, left, right), where left is all disjunct of this form, and
|
||||
/// right are all the others.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the input formula has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...` then left
|
||||
/// is set to the entire formula, and right is empty.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If no disjunct has the right shape, then a random Fin(i) is
|
||||
/// searched in the formula, and the output (i, left, right).
|
||||
/// is such that left contains all disjuncts containing Fin(i)
|
||||
/// (at any depth), and right contains the original formlula
|
||||
/// where Fin(i) has been replaced by false.
|
||||
std::tuple<int, acc_cond, acc_cond>
|
||||
fin_unit_one_split() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto [f, l, r] = code_.fin_unit_one_split();
|
||||
return {f, {num_sets(), std::move(l)}, {num_sets(), std::move(r)}};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Return the top-level disjuncts.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For instance, if the formula is
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
|
||||
// de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
enum genem_version_t { spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210 };
|
||||
enum genem_version_t { spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210, spot211 };
|
||||
static genem_version_t genem_version = spot29;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (emversion == nullptr || !strcasecmp(emversion, "spot29"))
|
||||
genem_version = spot29;
|
||||
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot211"))
|
||||
genem_version = spot211;
|
||||
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot210"))
|
||||
genem_version = spot210;
|
||||
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot28"))
|
||||
|
|
@ -41,7 +43,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
genem_version = atva19;
|
||||
else
|
||||
throw std::invalid_argument("generic_emptiness_check version should be "
|
||||
"one of {spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210}");
|
||||
"one of {spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210, "
|
||||
"spot211}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,6 +87,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
scc_split_check(const scc_info& si, unsigned scc, const acc_cond& acc,
|
||||
Extra extra, acc_cond::mark_t tocut)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (genem_version == spot211 || genem_version == spot210)
|
||||
tocut |= acc.fin_unit();
|
||||
scc_and_mark_filter filt(si, scc, tocut);
|
||||
filt.override_acceptance(acc);
|
||||
scc_info upper_si(filt, EarlyStop
|
||||
|
|
@ -118,13 +123,27 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// Try to accept when Fin(fo) == true
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) fo};
|
||||
if (!scc_split_check<EarlyStop, Extra>
|
||||
(si, scc, fpart.remove(fo_m, true), extra, fo_m))
|
||||
(si, scc, fpart, extra, fo_m))
|
||||
if constexpr (EarlyStop)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
// Try to accept when Fin(fo) == false
|
||||
acc = acc.force_inf(fo_m);
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (!acc.is_f());
|
||||
else if (genem_version == spot211)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto [fo, fpart, rest] = acc.fin_unit_one_split();
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) fo};
|
||||
if (!scc_split_check<EarlyStop, Extra>
|
||||
(si, scc, fpart, extra, fo_m))
|
||||
if constexpr (EarlyStop)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
acc = rest;
|
||||
}
|
||||
while (!acc.is_f());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (genem_version == spot29)
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
|
||||
// de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
|
|
@ -100,7 +100,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// - "spot29" improves upon the worst case of atva19. This is
|
||||
/// the default.
|
||||
/// - "spot210" improves upon "spot29" in a few cases where a Fin
|
||||
/// is shared by multiple disjuncts.
|
||||
/// is shared by multiple disjuncts. This improve the worst
|
||||
/// case complexity of EL-automata in the general case, but worsen
|
||||
/// the complexity of Hyper-Rabin in particular.
|
||||
/// - "spot211" is another attempt at fixing worst case complexities.
|
||||
/// Compared to atva19, this improves the complexities for Rabin,
|
||||
/// GeneralizedRabin, and EL without worsening the complexity of
|
||||
/// Hyper-Rabin.
|
||||
SPOT_API void
|
||||
generic_emptiness_check_select_version(const char* emversion = nullptr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ TESTS_python = \
|
|||
python/_altscc.ipynb \
|
||||
python/_autparserr.ipynb \
|
||||
python/_aux.ipynb \
|
||||
python/acc.py \
|
||||
python/accparse2.py \
|
||||
python/alarm.py \
|
||||
python/aliases.py \
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
65
tests/python/acc.py
Normal file
65
tests/python/acc.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
|||
# -*- mode: python; coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
# Copyright (C) 2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
|
||||
# de l'Epita
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Spot is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
||||
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
||||
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
||||
# (at your option) any later version.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Spot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
||||
# ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
|
||||
# or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public
|
||||
# License for more details.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
||||
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
|
||||
import spot
|
||||
from unittest import TestCase
|
||||
tc = TestCase()
|
||||
|
||||
a = spot.acc_cond('parity min odd 5')
|
||||
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
|
||||
'(0, {}, spot.acc_cond(5, "f"))'.format(repr(a)))
|
||||
|
||||
a.set_acceptance('Rabin 3')
|
||||
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
|
||||
'(0, spot.acc_cond(5, "Inf(1)"), '
|
||||
'spot.acc_cond(5, "(Fin(2) & Inf(3)) | (Fin(4) & Inf(5))"))')
|
||||
|
||||
a.set_acceptance('(Fin(0)|Inf(3))&(Fin(1)|Inf(4))&(Fin(2)|Inf(5)) |\
|
||||
(Fin(0)|Inf(4))&(Fin(1)|Inf(5))&(Fin(2)|Inf(3)) |\
|
||||
(Fin(0)|Inf(5))&(Fin(1)|Inf(3))&(Fin(2)|Inf(4))')
|
||||
|
||||
tc.maxDiff = None
|
||||
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
|
||||
'(0, spot.acc_cond(5, '
|
||||
'"((Fin(1) | Inf(4)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))) | '
|
||||
'((Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
|
||||
'((Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(4)))"), '
|
||||
'spot.acc_cond(5, '
|
||||
'"(Inf(3) & (Fin(1) | Inf(4)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))) | '
|
||||
'(Inf(4) & (Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
|
||||
'(Inf(5) & (Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(4)))"))')
|
||||
|
||||
a = a.remove([4], True)
|
||||
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
|
||||
'(1, spot.acc_cond(5, '
|
||||
'"(Fin(0) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))"), '
|
||||
'spot.acc_cond(5, '
|
||||
'"(Fin(0) & (Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
|
||||
'((Fin(0) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & Fin(2))"))')
|
||||
|
||||
def report_missing_exception():
|
||||
raise RuntimeError("missing exception")
|
||||
|
||||
a.set_acceptance("Inf(0)")
|
||||
try:
|
||||
a.fin_unit_one_split()
|
||||
except RuntimeError as e:
|
||||
tc.assertIn('no Fin', str(e))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
report_missing_exception()
|
||||
|
|
@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@
|
|||
"source": [
|
||||
"`fin_one()` return the number of one color `x` that appears as `Fin(x)` in the formula, or `-1` if the formula is Fin-less.\n",
|
||||
"\n",
|
||||
"The variant `fin_one_extract()` consider the acceptance condition as a disjunction (if the top-level operator is not a disjunction, we just assume the formula is a disjunction with only one disjunct), and return a pair `(x,c)` where `c` is the disjunction of all disjuncts of the original formula where `Fin(x)` appear. Also this function tries to choose an `x` such that one of the disjunct has the form `...&Fin(x)&...` if possible: this is visible in the third example, where 5 is prefered to 2."
|
||||
"The variant `fin_one_extract()` consider the acceptance condition as a disjunction (if the top-level operator is not a disjunction, we just assume the formula is a disjunction with only one disjunct), and return a pair `(x,c)` where `c` is the disjunction of all disjuncts of the original formula where `Fin(x)` used to appear but where `Fin(x)` have been replaced by `true`, and `Inf(x)` by `false`. Also this function tries to choose an `x` such that one of the disjunct has the form `...&Fin(x)&...` if possible: this is visible in the third example, where 5 is prefered to 2."
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@
|
|||
"text": [
|
||||
"(4, (Fin(0) | Inf(1)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3)))\n",
|
||||
"0\n",
|
||||
"(0, spot.acc_cond(4, \"(Fin(0) | Inf(1)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))\"))\n"
|
||||
"(0, spot.acc_cond(4, \"Fin(2) | Inf(3)\"))\n"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@
|
|||
"text": [
|
||||
"(6, (Fin(0) & Inf(1)) | (Fin(2) & Inf(3)) | (Fin(4) & Inf(5)))\n",
|
||||
"0\n",
|
||||
"(0, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Fin(0) & Inf(1)\"))\n"
|
||||
"(0, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Inf(1)\"))\n"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@
|
|||
"text": [
|
||||
"(6, (Inf(0) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | (Inf(4) & Fin(5)) | ((Inf(0)&Inf(5)) & (Fin(0)|Fin(5))))\n",
|
||||
"2\n",
|
||||
"(5, spot.acc_cond(6, \"(Inf(4) & Fin(5)) | ((Inf(0)&Inf(5)) & (Fin(0)|Fin(5)))\"))\n"
|
||||
"(5, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Inf(4)\"))\n"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
|
|
@ -1483,11 +1483,40 @@
|
|||
"print(acc3.fin_one())\n",
|
||||
"print(acc3.fin_one_extract())"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cell_type": "code",
|
||||
"execution_count": 58,
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"outputs": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "stdout",
|
||||
"output_type": "stream",
|
||||
"text": [
|
||||
"(8, (Fin(1) & Inf(2)) | (Inf(3)&Inf(4)) | (Inf(5) & (Fin(1)|Fin(7))))\n",
|
||||
"1\n",
|
||||
"(1, spot.acc_cond(8, \"Inf(2) | Inf(5)\"))\n"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"source": [
|
||||
"acc4 = spot.acc_cond('Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))')\n",
|
||||
"print(acc4)\n",
|
||||
"print(acc4.fin_one())\n",
|
||||
"print(acc4.fin_one_extract())"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"cell_type": "code",
|
||||
"execution_count": null,
|
||||
"metadata": {},
|
||||
"outputs": [],
|
||||
"source": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"metadata": {
|
||||
"kernelspec": {
|
||||
"display_name": "Python 3",
|
||||
"display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
|
||||
"language": "python",
|
||||
"name": "python3"
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
|
@ -1501,7 +1530,7 @@
|
|||
"name": "python",
|
||||
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
|
||||
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
|
||||
"version": "3.7.3"
|
||||
"version": "3.10.5"
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"nbformat": 4,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -305,14 +305,17 @@ def run_bench(automata):
|
|||
res3c = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
|
||||
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot210")
|
||||
res3d = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
|
||||
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot211")
|
||||
res3e = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
|
||||
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot29")
|
||||
res2 = spot.remove_fin(aut).is_empty()
|
||||
res1 = generic_emptiness2(aut)
|
||||
res = (str(res1)[0] + str(res2)[0] + str(res3a)[0]
|
||||
+ str(res3b)[0] + str(res3c)[0] + str(res3d)[0]
|
||||
+ str(res4)[0] + str(res5)[0])
|
||||
+ str(res3e)[0] + str(res4)[0] + str(res5)[0])
|
||||
print(res)
|
||||
tc.assertIn(res, ('TTTTTTTT', 'FFFFFFFF'))
|
||||
if res == 'FFFFFFFF':
|
||||
tc.assertIn(res, ('TTTTTTTTT', 'FFFFFFFFF'))
|
||||
if res == 'FFFFFFFFF':
|
||||
run3 = spot.generic_accepting_run(aut)
|
||||
tc.assertTrue(run3.replay(spot.get_cout()))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue