add a newer version of the generic emptiness check

As discussed with Jan Strejček.

* spot/twa/acc.cc, spot/twa/acc.hh (fin_unit_one_split): New function.
(fin_one_extract): Return the simplified acceptance condition as an
optimization.
* python/spot/impl.i: Bind this new function.
* tests/python/acc.py: New file, to test it.
* tests/Makefile.am: Add acc.py.
* spot/twaalgos/genem.cc, spot/twaalgos/genem.hh: Implement the
spot211 variant of the emptiness check.
* tests/python/genem.py: Test it.
* tests/python/acc_cond.ipynb: Adjust test for fin_one_extract.
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz 2022-05-25 17:02:38 +02:00
parent aca6bd9042
commit 721d5695ec
9 changed files with 308 additions and 30 deletions

View file

@ -551,6 +551,17 @@ namespace std {
}
%apply std::vector<unsigned> &OUTPUT {std::vector<unsigned>& pairs}
%apply std::vector<spot::acc_cond::rs_pair> &OUTPUT {std::vector<spot::acc_cond::rs_pair>& pairs}
// Must occur before the twa declaration
%typemap(out) SWIGTYPE spot::acc_cond::fin_unit_one_split %{
{
auto& v = static_cast<const std::tuple<int, spot::acc_cond, spot::acc_cond>>($1);
$result = PyTuple_Pack(3,
swig::from(std::get<0>(v)),
swig::from(std::get<1>(v)),
swig::from(std::get<2>(v)));
}
%}
%include <spot/twa/acc.hh>
%template(pair_bool_mark) std::pair<bool, spot::acc_cond::mark_t>;

View file

@ -2707,6 +2707,35 @@ namespace spot
return false;
}
// Check wheter pos looks like Fin(f) or Fin(f)&rest
bool is_conj_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t f)
{
auto sub = pos - pos->sub.size;
do
{
switch (pos->sub.op)
{
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
--pos;
break;
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
break;
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
if (pos[-1].mark & f)
return true;
SPOT_FALLTHROUGH;
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
pos -= 2;
break;
}
}
while (sub < pos);
return false;
}
acc_cond::acc_code extract_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos,
acc_cond::mark_t f)
{
@ -2716,7 +2745,7 @@ namespace spot
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
return pos;
return strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
{
--pos;
@ -2725,7 +2754,7 @@ namespace spot
{
if (uses_fin(pos, f))
{
acc_cond::acc_code tmp(pos);
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
tmp |= std::move(res);
std::swap(tmp, res);
}
@ -2742,6 +2771,52 @@ namespace spot
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
return {};
}
std::pair<acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
split_top_fin(const acc_cond::acc_word* pos, acc_cond::mark_t f)
{
auto start = pos - pos->sub.size;
switch (pos->sub.op)
{
case acc_cond::acc_op::And:
case acc_cond::acc_op::Fin:
if (is_conj_fin(pos, f))
return {pos, acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
SPOT_FALLTHROUGH;
case acc_cond::acc_op::Inf:
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), pos};
case acc_cond::acc_op::Or:
{
--pos;
auto left = acc_cond::acc_code::f();
auto right = acc_cond::acc_code::f();
do
{
if (is_conj_fin(pos, f))
{
auto tmp = strip_rec(pos, f, true, false);
tmp |= std::move(left);
std::swap(tmp, left);
}
else
{
acc_cond::acc_code tmp(pos);
tmp |= std::move(right);
std::swap(tmp, right);
}
pos -= pos->sub.size + 1;
}
while (pos > start);
return {std::move(left), std::move(right)};
}
case acc_cond::acc_op::FinNeg:
case acc_cond::acc_op::InfNeg:
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
}
SPOT_UNREACHABLE();
return {acc_cond::acc_code::f(), acc_cond::acc_code::f()};
}
}
std::pair<int, acc_cond::acc_code>
@ -2756,6 +2831,26 @@ namespace spot
return {selected_fin, extract_fin(pos, {(unsigned) selected_fin})};
}
std::tuple<int, acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
acc_cond::acc_code::fin_unit_one_split() const
{
if (SPOT_UNLIKELY(is_t() || is_f()))
err:
throw std::runtime_error("fin_unit_one_split(): no Fin");
const acc_cond::acc_word* pos = &back();
int selected_fin = has_top_fin(pos);
if (selected_fin >= 0)
{
auto [left, right] = split_top_fin(pos, {(unsigned) selected_fin});
return {selected_fin, std::move(left), std::move(right)};
}
selected_fin = fin_one();
if (selected_fin < 0)
goto err;
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) selected_fin};
return {selected_fin, extract_fin(pos, fo_m), force_inf(fo_m)};
}
namespace
{
bool

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
// Copyright (C) 2014-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
// Copyright (C) 2014-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
// de l'Epita.
//
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <algorithm>
#include <numeric>
#include <bddx.h>
#include <tuple>
#include <spot/misc/_config.h>
#include <spot/misc/bitset.hh>
#include <spot/misc/trival.hh>
@ -1271,7 +1272,8 @@ namespace spot
int fin_one() const;
/// \brief Return one acceptance set i that appears as `Fin(i)`
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it.
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it with
/// Fin(i) changed to true and Inf(i) to false.
///
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then `i` will be prefered
@ -1282,13 +1284,34 @@ namespace spot
/// `Fin(i)` have been removed.
///
/// For example on
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))`
/// the output would be the pair
/// `(1, Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`.
/// On that example `Fin(1)` is prefered to `Fin(7)` because
/// it appears at the top-level.
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))` the
/// output would be the pair, we would select `Fin(1)` over
/// `Fin(7)` because it appears at the top-level. Then we would
/// collect the disjuncts containing `Fin(1)`, that is,
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`. Finally we would
/// replace `Fin(1)` by true and `Inf(1)` by false. The return
/// value would then be `(1, Inf(2)|Inf(5))`.
std::pair<int, acc_code> fin_one_extract() const;
/// \brief Split an acceptance condition, trying to select one
/// unit-Fin.
///
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct as
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then this will return
/// (i, left, right), where left is all disjunct of this form, and
/// right are all the others.
///
/// If the input formula has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...` then left
/// is set to the entire formula, and right is empty.
///
/// If no disjunct has the right shape, then a random Fin(i) is
/// searched in the formula, and the output (i, left, right).
/// is such that left contains all disjuncts containing Fin(i)
/// (at any depth), and right contains the original formlula
/// where Fin(i) has been replaced by false.
std::tuple<int, acc_cond::acc_code, acc_cond::acc_code>
fin_unit_one_split() const;
/// \brief Help closing accepting or rejecting cycle.
///
/// Assuming you have a partial cycle visiting all acceptance
@ -2203,7 +2226,8 @@ namespace spot
}
/// \brief Return one acceptance set i that appears as `Fin(i)`
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it.
/// in the condition, and all disjuncts containing it with
/// Fin(i) changed to true and Inf(i) to false.
///
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then `i` will be prefered
@ -2214,17 +2238,42 @@ namespace spot
/// `Fin(i)` have been removed.
///
/// For example on
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))`
/// the output would be the pair
/// `(1, Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`.
/// On that example `Fin(1)` is prefered to `Fin(7)` because
/// it appears at the top-level.
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))` the
/// output would be the pair, we would select `Fin(1)` over
/// `Fin(7)` because it appears at the top-level. Then we would
/// collect the disjuncts containing `Fin(1)`, that is,
/// `Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7)))`. Finally we would
/// replace `Fin(1)` by true and `Inf(1)` by false. The return
/// value would then be `(1, Inf(2)|Inf(5))`.
std::pair<int, acc_cond> fin_one_extract() const
{
auto [f, c] = code_.fin_one_extract();
return {f, {num_sets(), std::move(c)}};
}
/// \brief Split an acceptance condition, trying to select one
/// unit-Fin.
///
/// If the condition is a disjunction and one of the disjunct as
/// has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...`, then this will return
/// (i, left, right), where left is all disjunct of this form, and
/// right are all the others.
///
/// If the input formula has the shape `...&Fin(i)&...` then left
/// is set to the entire formula, and right is empty.
///
/// If no disjunct has the right shape, then a random Fin(i) is
/// searched in the formula, and the output (i, left, right).
/// is such that left contains all disjuncts containing Fin(i)
/// (at any depth), and right contains the original formlula
/// where Fin(i) has been replaced by false.
std::tuple<int, acc_cond, acc_cond>
fin_unit_one_split() const
{
auto [f, l, r] = code_.fin_unit_one_split();
return {f, {num_sets(), std::move(l)}, {num_sets(), std::move(r)}};
}
/// \brief Return the top-level disjuncts.
///
/// For instance, if the formula is

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
// Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
// de l'Epita (LRDE).
//
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ namespace spot
{
namespace
{
enum genem_version_t { spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210 };
enum genem_version_t { spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210, spot211 };
static genem_version_t genem_version = spot29;
}
@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ namespace spot
{
if (emversion == nullptr || !strcasecmp(emversion, "spot29"))
genem_version = spot29;
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot211"))
genem_version = spot211;
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot210"))
genem_version = spot210;
else if (!strcasecmp(emversion, "spot28"))
@ -41,7 +43,8 @@ namespace spot
genem_version = atva19;
else
throw std::invalid_argument("generic_emptiness_check version should be "
"one of {spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210}");
"one of {spot28, atva19, spot29, spot210, "
"spot211}");
}
namespace
@ -84,6 +87,8 @@ namespace spot
scc_split_check(const scc_info& si, unsigned scc, const acc_cond& acc,
Extra extra, acc_cond::mark_t tocut)
{
if (genem_version == spot211 || genem_version == spot210)
tocut |= acc.fin_unit();
scc_and_mark_filter filt(si, scc, tocut);
filt.override_acceptance(acc);
scc_info upper_si(filt, EarlyStop
@ -118,13 +123,27 @@ namespace spot
// Try to accept when Fin(fo) == true
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) fo};
if (!scc_split_check<EarlyStop, Extra>
(si, scc, fpart.remove(fo_m, true), extra, fo_m))
(si, scc, fpart, extra, fo_m))
if constexpr (EarlyStop)
return false;
// Try to accept when Fin(fo) == false
acc = acc.force_inf(fo_m);
}
while (!acc.is_f());
else if (genem_version == spot211)
{
do
{
auto [fo, fpart, rest] = acc.fin_unit_one_split();
acc_cond::mark_t fo_m = {(unsigned) fo};
if (!scc_split_check<EarlyStop, Extra>
(si, scc, fpart, extra, fo_m))
if constexpr (EarlyStop)
return false;
acc = rest;
}
while (!acc.is_f());
}
else if (genem_version == spot29)
do
{

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
// Copyright (C) 2017-2021 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
// Copyright (C) 2017-2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
// de l'Epita (LRDE).
//
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
@ -100,7 +100,13 @@ namespace spot
/// - "spot29" improves upon the worst case of atva19. This is
/// the default.
/// - "spot210" improves upon "spot29" in a few cases where a Fin
/// is shared by multiple disjuncts.
/// is shared by multiple disjuncts. This improve the worst
/// case complexity of EL-automata in the general case, but worsen
/// the complexity of Hyper-Rabin in particular.
/// - "spot211" is another attempt at fixing worst case complexities.
/// Compared to atva19, this improves the complexities for Rabin,
/// GeneralizedRabin, and EL without worsening the complexity of
/// Hyper-Rabin.
SPOT_API void
generic_emptiness_check_select_version(const char* emversion = nullptr);

View file

@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ TESTS_python = \
python/_altscc.ipynb \
python/_autparserr.ipynb \
python/_aux.ipynb \
python/acc.py \
python/accparse2.py \
python/alarm.py \
python/aliases.py \

65
tests/python/acc.py Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# -*- mode: python; coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (C) 2022 Laboratoire de Recherche et Développement
# de l'Epita
#
# This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
#
# Spot is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# Spot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
# ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
# or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public
# License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
import spot
from unittest import TestCase
tc = TestCase()
a = spot.acc_cond('parity min odd 5')
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
'(0, {}, spot.acc_cond(5, "f"))'.format(repr(a)))
a.set_acceptance('Rabin 3')
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
'(0, spot.acc_cond(5, "Inf(1)"), '
'spot.acc_cond(5, "(Fin(2) & Inf(3)) | (Fin(4) & Inf(5))"))')
a.set_acceptance('(Fin(0)|Inf(3))&(Fin(1)|Inf(4))&(Fin(2)|Inf(5)) |\
(Fin(0)|Inf(4))&(Fin(1)|Inf(5))&(Fin(2)|Inf(3)) |\
(Fin(0)|Inf(5))&(Fin(1)|Inf(3))&(Fin(2)|Inf(4))')
tc.maxDiff = None
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
'(0, spot.acc_cond(5, '
'"((Fin(1) | Inf(4)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))) | '
'((Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
'((Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(4)))"), '
'spot.acc_cond(5, '
'"(Inf(3) & (Fin(1) | Inf(4)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))) | '
'(Inf(4) & (Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
'(Inf(5) & (Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(4)))"))')
a = a.remove([4], True)
tc.assertEqual(str(a.fin_unit_one_split()),
'(1, spot.acc_cond(5, '
'"(Fin(0) | Inf(3)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(5))"), '
'spot.acc_cond(5, '
'"(Fin(0) & (Fin(1) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | '
'((Fin(0) | Inf(5)) & (Fin(1) | Inf(3)) & Fin(2))"))')
def report_missing_exception():
raise RuntimeError("missing exception")
a.set_acceptance("Inf(0)")
try:
a.fin_unit_one_split()
except RuntimeError as e:
tc.assertIn('no Fin', str(e))
else:
report_missing_exception()

View file

@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@
"source": [
"`fin_one()` return the number of one color `x` that appears as `Fin(x)` in the formula, or `-1` if the formula is Fin-less.\n",
"\n",
"The variant `fin_one_extract()` consider the acceptance condition as a disjunction (if the top-level operator is not a disjunction, we just assume the formula is a disjunction with only one disjunct), and return a pair `(x,c)` where `c` is the disjunction of all disjuncts of the original formula where `Fin(x)` appear. Also this function tries to choose an `x` such that one of the disjunct has the form `...&Fin(x)&...` if possible: this is visible in the third example, where 5 is prefered to 2."
"The variant `fin_one_extract()` consider the acceptance condition as a disjunction (if the top-level operator is not a disjunction, we just assume the formula is a disjunction with only one disjunct), and return a pair `(x,c)` where `c` is the disjunction of all disjuncts of the original formula where `Fin(x)` used to appear but where `Fin(x)` have been replaced by `true`, and `Inf(x)` by `false`. Also this function tries to choose an `x` such that one of the disjunct has the form `...&Fin(x)&...` if possible: this is visible in the third example, where 5 is prefered to 2."
]
},
{
@ -1430,7 +1430,7 @@
"text": [
"(4, (Fin(0) | Inf(1)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3)))\n",
"0\n",
"(0, spot.acc_cond(4, \"(Fin(0) | Inf(1)) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))\"))\n"
"(0, spot.acc_cond(4, \"Fin(2) | Inf(3)\"))\n"
]
}
],
@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@
"text": [
"(6, (Fin(0) & Inf(1)) | (Fin(2) & Inf(3)) | (Fin(4) & Inf(5)))\n",
"0\n",
"(0, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Fin(0) & Inf(1)\"))\n"
"(0, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Inf(1)\"))\n"
]
}
],
@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@
"text": [
"(6, (Inf(0) & (Fin(2) | Inf(3))) | (Inf(4) & Fin(5)) | ((Inf(0)&Inf(5)) & (Fin(0)|Fin(5))))\n",
"2\n",
"(5, spot.acc_cond(6, \"(Inf(4) & Fin(5)) | ((Inf(0)&Inf(5)) & (Fin(0)|Fin(5)))\"))\n"
"(5, spot.acc_cond(6, \"Inf(4)\"))\n"
]
}
],
@ -1483,11 +1483,40 @@
"print(acc3.fin_one())\n",
"print(acc3.fin_one_extract())"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": 58,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [
{
"name": "stdout",
"output_type": "stream",
"text": [
"(8, (Fin(1) & Inf(2)) | (Inf(3)&Inf(4)) | (Inf(5) & (Fin(1)|Fin(7))))\n",
"1\n",
"(1, spot.acc_cond(8, \"Inf(2) | Inf(5)\"))\n"
]
}
],
"source": [
"acc4 = spot.acc_cond('Fin(1)&Inf(2)|Inf(3)&Inf(4)|Inf(5)&(Fin(1)|Fin(7))')\n",
"print(acc4)\n",
"print(acc4.fin_one())\n",
"print(acc4.fin_one_extract())"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": []
}
],
"metadata": {
"kernelspec": {
"display_name": "Python 3",
"display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
"language": "python",
"name": "python3"
},
@ -1501,7 +1530,7 @@
"name": "python",
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
"version": "3.7.3"
"version": "3.10.5"
}
},
"nbformat": 4,

View file

@ -305,14 +305,17 @@ def run_bench(automata):
res3c = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot210")
res3d = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot211")
res3e = spot.generic_emptiness_check(aut)
spot.generic_emptiness_check_select_version("spot29")
res2 = spot.remove_fin(aut).is_empty()
res1 = generic_emptiness2(aut)
res = (str(res1)[0] + str(res2)[0] + str(res3a)[0]
+ str(res3b)[0] + str(res3c)[0] + str(res3d)[0]
+ str(res4)[0] + str(res5)[0])
+ str(res3e)[0] + str(res4)[0] + str(res5)[0])
print(res)
tc.assertIn(res, ('TTTTTTTT', 'FFFFFFFF'))
if res == 'FFFFFFFF':
tc.assertIn(res, ('TTTTTTTTT', 'FFFFFFFFF'))
if res == 'FFFFFFFFF':
run3 = spot.generic_accepting_run(aut)
tc.assertTrue(run3.replay(spot.get_cout()))