modernize some Python code
Since we now require Python 3.6, we can use f-strings instead of format() to make the code more readable. * doc/org/tut01.org, doc/org/tut02.org, doc/org/tut03.org, doc/org/tut21.org, doc/org/tut24.org, doc/org/tut90.org, python/spot/__init__.py, python/spot/jupyter.py, tests/python/acc.py, tests/python/acc_cond.ipynb, tests/python/complement_semidet.py, tests/python/decompose.ipynb, tests/python/formulas.ipynb, tests/python/highlighting.ipynb, tests/python/ipnbdoctest.py, tests/python/ltlf.py, tests/python/parity.ipynb, tests/python/product.ipynb, tests/python/relabel.py, tests/python/satmin.ipynb, tests/python/stutter-inv.ipynb, tests/python/twagraph-internals.ipynb, tests/python/zlktree.ipynb: Use f-strings.
This commit is contained in:
parent
df44f7a5c2
commit
7ac570fa3f
23 changed files with 292 additions and 327 deletions
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ m = spot.relabeling_map()
|
|||
g = spot.relabel_bse(f, spot.Pnn, m)
|
||||
res = ""
|
||||
for old, new in m.items():
|
||||
res += "#define {} {}\n".format(old, new)
|
||||
res += f"#define {old} {new}\n"
|
||||
res += str(g)
|
||||
tc.assertEqual(res, """#define p0 a & b
|
||||
#define p1 c
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue