* src/tgba/succiter.hh (tgba_succ_iterator::current_condition):
State that this is a boolean function. * src/tgba/succiterconcrete.hh (tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_dest_, tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_set_, tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_set_left_, tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::neg_trans_set_): Remove. * src/tgba/succiterconcrete.cc (tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::tgba_succ_iterator_concrete, tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::first): Adjust to removed members. (tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::next): Simplify, transitions are no labelled by boolean functions, not only conjunctions. Suggested by Denis Poitrenaud.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3281b6e9b3
commit
c09f646e3f
4 changed files with 64 additions and 86 deletions
26
ChangeLog
26
ChangeLog
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,27 @@
|
|||
2003-07-03 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <aduret@src.lip6.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
* src/tgba/succiter.hh (tgba_succ_iterator::current_condition):
|
||||
State that this is a boolean function.
|
||||
* src/tgba/succiterconcrete.hh
|
||||
(tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_dest_,
|
||||
tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_set_,
|
||||
tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::trans_set_left_,
|
||||
tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::neg_trans_set_): Remove.
|
||||
* src/tgba/succiterconcrete.cc
|
||||
(tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::tgba_succ_iterator_concrete,
|
||||
tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::first): Adjust to removed members.
|
||||
(tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::next): Simplify, transitions
|
||||
are no labelled by boolean functions, not only conjunctions.
|
||||
Suggested by Denis Poitrenaud.
|
||||
|
||||
2003-07-02 Alexandre Duret-Lutz <aduret@src.lip6.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddcoredata.hh (tgba_bdd_core_data::translate): New
|
||||
function.
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddcoredata.cc (tgba_bdd_core_data::translate):
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddcoredata.hh (tgba_bdd_core_data::translate): New
|
||||
function.
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddcoredata.cc (tgba_bdd_core_data::translate):
|
||||
Likewise.
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddtranslatefactory.cc
|
||||
(tgba_bdd_translate_factory::tgba_bdd_translate_factory): Use
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddtranslatefactory.cc
|
||||
(tgba_bdd_translate_factory::tgba_bdd_translate_factory): Use
|
||||
tgba_bdd_core_data::translate.
|
||||
|
||||
* src/tgba/tgbabddcoredata.hh (tgba_bdd_core_data::nownext_set):
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// with different conditions, leading to the same state.
|
||||
virtual state* current_state() = 0;
|
||||
/// \brief Get the condition on the transition leading to this successor.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is a boolean function of atomic propositions.
|
||||
virtual bdd current_condition() = 0;
|
||||
/// \brief Get the accepting conditions on the transition leading
|
||||
/// to this successor.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,9 +8,6 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
: data_(d),
|
||||
succ_set_(successors),
|
||||
succ_set_left_(successors),
|
||||
trans_dest_(bddfalse),
|
||||
trans_set_(bddfalse),
|
||||
trans_set_left_(bddfalse),
|
||||
current_(bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -23,9 +20,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
tgba_succ_iterator_concrete::first()
|
||||
{
|
||||
succ_set_left_ = succ_set_;
|
||||
trans_dest_ = bddfalse;
|
||||
trans_set_ = bddfalse;
|
||||
trans_set_left_ = bddfalse;
|
||||
current_ = bddfalse;
|
||||
if (!done())
|
||||
next();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,10 +44,10 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// a & b & Next[a] & !Next[b]
|
||||
// This denotes four transitions, three of which going to
|
||||
// the same node. Obviously (a&b | !a&b | a&!b)
|
||||
// == (a | b), so it's tempting to replace these three
|
||||
// transitions by the following two:
|
||||
// a & Next[a] & Next[b]
|
||||
// b & Next[a] & Next[b]
|
||||
// == (a | b), so it's tempting to replace these four
|
||||
// transitions by
|
||||
// (a + b) & Next[a] & Next[b]
|
||||
// a & b & Next[a] & !Next[b]
|
||||
// Is this always correct? No! It depends on the
|
||||
// accepting conditions associated to each transition.
|
||||
// We cannot merge transitions which have different
|
||||
|
|
@ -70,86 +65,55 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
|
||||
do
|
||||
{
|
||||
// We performs a two-level iteration on transitions.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// succ_set_ and succ_set_left_ hold the information about the
|
||||
// outer loop: the set of all transitiong going off this
|
||||
// state.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// From this (outer) set, we compute subsets of transitions
|
||||
// going to the same state and sharing the same accepting
|
||||
// conditions. These are held by the trans_set_ and
|
||||
// trans_set_left_ variables.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We iterate of trans_set_ until all its transitions
|
||||
// have been seen (trans_set_left_ is then empty). Then
|
||||
// we remove trans_set_ from succ_set_left_ and compute another
|
||||
// subset of succ_set_left_ to iterate over.
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: Iterating on the successors this way (calling
|
||||
// bdd_satone{,set} and NANDing out the result from a
|
||||
// set) requires several descent of the BDD. Maybe it would be
|
||||
// faster to compute all satisfying formula in one operation.
|
||||
|
||||
if (trans_set_left_ == bddfalse)
|
||||
succ_set_left_ &= !current_;
|
||||
if (succ_set_left_ == bddfalse) // No more successors?
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick one transition, and extract its destination.
|
||||
bdd trans = bdd_satoneset(succ_set_left_, data_.next_set,
|
||||
bddfalse);
|
||||
bdd dest = bdd_exist(trans, data_.notnext_set);
|
||||
|
||||
// Gather all transitions going to this destination...
|
||||
current_ = succ_set_left_ & dest;
|
||||
// ... and compute their accepting sets.
|
||||
bdd as = data_.accepting_conditions & current_;
|
||||
|
||||
// AS is false when no satisfaction of the current transition
|
||||
// belongs to an accepting set: current_ can be used as-is.
|
||||
if (as != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
succ_set_left_ &= !(trans_set_ & trans_dest_);
|
||||
if (succ_set_left_ == bddfalse) // No more successors?
|
||||
return;
|
||||
// Otherwise, we have accepting sets, and we should
|
||||
// restrict current_ to a subset sharing the same
|
||||
// accepting conditions.
|
||||
// same accepting set.
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick one transition, and extract its destination.
|
||||
bdd trans = bdd_satoneset(succ_set_left_, data_.next_set,
|
||||
bddfalse);
|
||||
trans_dest_ = bdd_exist(trans, data_.notnext_set);
|
||||
|
||||
// Gather all transitions going to this destination...
|
||||
bdd st = succ_set_left_ & trans_dest_;
|
||||
// ... and compute their accepting sets.
|
||||
bdd as = data_.accepting_conditions & st;
|
||||
|
||||
if (as == bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// AS is false when no transition from ST belongs to
|
||||
// an accepting set. Iterate over ST directly.
|
||||
trans_set_ = bdd_exist(st, data_.nownext_set);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Otherwise, we have accepting sets, and we should
|
||||
// only work over a set of transitions sharing the
|
||||
// same accepting set.
|
||||
|
||||
as = bdd_exist(as, data_.nownext_set);
|
||||
// as = (a | (!a)&b) & (Acc[a] | Acc[b]) + (!a & Acc[b])
|
||||
bdd cube = bdd_satone(as);
|
||||
// cube = (!ab & Acc[a])
|
||||
bdd prop = bdd_exist(cube, data_.acc_set);
|
||||
// prop = (!a)&b
|
||||
bdd acc = bdd_forall(bdd_restrict(as, prop), data_.var_set);
|
||||
// acc = (Acc[a] | Acc[b])
|
||||
trans_set_ = bdd_restrict(as, acc);
|
||||
// trans_set = (a | (!a)&b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
trans_set_left_ = trans_set_;
|
||||
neg_trans_set_ = !trans_set_;
|
||||
as = bdd_exist(as, data_.nownext_set);
|
||||
// as = (a | (!a)&b) & (Acc[a] | Acc[b]) + (!a & Acc[b])
|
||||
bdd cube = bdd_satone(as);
|
||||
// cube = (!ab & Acc[a])
|
||||
bdd prop = bdd_exist(cube, data_.acc_set);
|
||||
// prop = (!a)&b
|
||||
bdd acc = bdd_forall(bdd_restrict(as, prop), data_.var_set);
|
||||
// acc = (Acc[a] | Acc[b])
|
||||
bdd all = as & acc;
|
||||
// all = (a | (!a)&b) & (Acc[a] | Acc[b])
|
||||
current_ = bdd_exist(all, data_.acc_set) & dest;
|
||||
// current_ = (a | (!a)&b) & (Next...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick and remove one satisfaction from trans_set_left_.
|
||||
bdd cube = bdd_satone(trans_set_left_);
|
||||
trans_set_left_ &= !cube;
|
||||
// Let this cube grow as much as possible.
|
||||
// (e.g., cube "(!a)&b" taken from "a | (!a)&b" can
|
||||
// be simplified to "b").
|
||||
cube = bdd_simplify(cube, cube | neg_trans_set_);
|
||||
// Complete with the destination.
|
||||
current_ = cube & trans_dest_;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(current_ != bddfalse);
|
||||
// The destination state, computed here, should be compatible
|
||||
// with the transition relation. Otherwise it won't have any
|
||||
// successor (a dead node) and we can skip it. We need to
|
||||
// compute current_state_ anyway, so this test costs us nothing.
|
||||
current_state_ = bdd_replace(bdd_exist(current_, data_.notnext_set),
|
||||
data_.next_to_now);
|
||||
assert(dest == bdd_exist(current_, data_.notnext_set));
|
||||
current_state_ = bdd_replace(dest, data_.next_to_now);
|
||||
}
|
||||
while ((current_state_ & data_.relation) == bddfalse);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -38,10 +38,6 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const tgba_bdd_core_data& data_; ///< Core data of the automaton.
|
||||
bdd succ_set_; ///< The set of successors.
|
||||
bdd succ_set_left_; ///< Unexplored successors (including current_).
|
||||
bdd trans_dest_; ///< Destination state of currently explored subset
|
||||
bdd trans_set_; ///< Set of successors with the same destination.
|
||||
bdd neg_trans_set_; ///< Negation of trans_set_.
|
||||
bdd trans_set_left_;///< Part of trans_set_ not yet explored.
|
||||
bdd current_; ///< \brief Current successor, as a conjunction of
|
||||
/// atomic proposition and Next variables.
|
||||
bdd current_state_; ///< \brief Current successor, as a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue