sccfilter: ignore more acceptance conditions
* src/tgbaalgos/sccfilter.cc: Compute useless variable SCC-wise, then renumber the useful variables so that they can be shared between SCCs. * src/tgbatest/sccsimpl.test, src/tgbatest/ltl2ta.test: Adjust test cases.
This commit is contained in:
parent
05e59a9e1a
commit
c46891edc7
3 changed files with 195 additions and 72 deletions
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
|||
// Copyright (C) 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Laboratoire de Recherche et
|
||||
// Développement de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Laboratoire de Recherche
|
||||
// et Développement de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
|
@ -20,13 +21,15 @@
|
|||
#include "tgba/tgbaexplicit.hh"
|
||||
#include "reachiter.hh"
|
||||
#include "tgbaalgos/scc.hh"
|
||||
#include "misc/bddop.hh"
|
||||
#include <sstream>
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
// BDD.id -> Acc number
|
||||
typedef std::map<int, unsigned> accremap_t;
|
||||
typedef std::vector<accremap_t> remap_table_t;
|
||||
|
||||
static
|
||||
state_explicit_number::transition*
|
||||
create_transition(const tgba*, tgba_explicit_number* out_aut,
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,20 +70,90 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
typedef T output_t;
|
||||
typedef std::map<int, bdd> map_t;
|
||||
typedef std::vector<map_t> remap_t;
|
||||
|
||||
filter_iter(const tgba* a,
|
||||
const scc_map& sm,
|
||||
const std::vector<bool>& useless,
|
||||
bdd useful, bdd strip, bool remove_all_useless)
|
||||
remap_table_t& remap_table,
|
||||
unsigned max_num,
|
||||
const std::vector<unsigned>& max_table,
|
||||
bool remove_all_useless)
|
||||
: tgba_reachable_iterator_depth_first(a),
|
||||
out_(new T(a->get_dict())),
|
||||
sm_(sm),
|
||||
useless_(useless),
|
||||
useful_(useful),
|
||||
strip_(strip),
|
||||
all_(remove_all_useless)
|
||||
max_num_(max_num),
|
||||
all_(remove_all_useless),
|
||||
acc_(max_num)
|
||||
{
|
||||
out_->set_acceptance_conditions(useful);
|
||||
acc_[0] = bddfalse;
|
||||
bdd tmp = a->all_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
bdd_dict* d = a->get_dict();
|
||||
assert(a->number_of_acceptance_conditions() >= max_num_ - 1);
|
||||
if (tmp != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (unsigned n = max_num_ - 1; n > 0; --n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(tmp != bddfalse);
|
||||
const ltl::formula* a = d->oneacc_to_formula(bdd_var(tmp));
|
||||
out_->declare_acceptance_condition(a->clone());
|
||||
tmp = bdd_low(tmp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
tmp = a->all_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
for (unsigned n = max_num_ - 1; n > 0; --n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const ltl::formula* a = d->oneacc_to_formula(bdd_var(tmp));
|
||||
acc_[n] = out_->get_acceptance_condition(a->clone());
|
||||
tmp = bdd_low(tmp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(max_num_ == 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned c = sm.scc_count();
|
||||
remap_.resize(c);
|
||||
bdd all_orig_neg = aut_->neg_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
bdd all_sup = bdd_support(all_orig_neg);
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned n = 0; n < c; ++n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!sm.accepting(n))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
bdd missingacc = bddfalse;
|
||||
for (unsigned a = max_table[n]; a < max_num_; ++a)
|
||||
missingacc |= acc_[a];
|
||||
|
||||
bdd all = sm.useful_acc_of(n);
|
||||
while (all != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd one = bdd_satoneset(all, all_sup, bddtrue);
|
||||
all -= one;
|
||||
bdd res = bddfalse;
|
||||
bdd resacc = bddfalse;
|
||||
while (one != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (bdd_high(one) == bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
one = bdd_low(one);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
int vn = bdd_var(one);
|
||||
bdd v = bdd_ithvar(vn);
|
||||
resacc |= bdd_exist(all_orig_neg, v) & v;
|
||||
res |= acc_[remap_table[n][vn]];
|
||||
one = bdd_high(one);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (res != bddfalse)
|
||||
res |= missingacc;
|
||||
int id = resacc.id();
|
||||
remap_[n][id] = res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
T*
|
||||
|
|
@ -112,20 +185,24 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
//
|
||||
// (See the documentation of scc_filter() for a rational.)
|
||||
unsigned u = sm_.scc_of_state(out_s);
|
||||
if (sm_.accepting(u)
|
||||
&& (!all_ || u == sm_.scc_of_state(in_s)))
|
||||
out_->add_acceptance_conditions
|
||||
(t, (bdd_exist(si->current_acceptance_conditions(), strip_)
|
||||
& useful_));
|
||||
unsigned v = sm_.scc_of_state(in_s);
|
||||
if (sm_.accepting(u) && (!all_ || u == v))
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd acc = si->current_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
if (acc == bddfalse)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
t->acceptance_conditions = remap_[u][acc.id()];
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private:
|
||||
T* out_;
|
||||
const scc_map& sm_;
|
||||
const std::vector<bool>& useless_;
|
||||
bdd useful_;
|
||||
bdd strip_;
|
||||
unsigned max_num_;
|
||||
bool all_;
|
||||
std::vector<bdd> acc_;
|
||||
remap_t remap_;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
} // anonymous
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,47 +214,95 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
sm.build_map();
|
||||
scc_stats ss = build_scc_stats(sm);
|
||||
|
||||
bdd useful = ss.useful_acc;
|
||||
remap_table_t remap_table(ss.scc_total);
|
||||
std::vector<unsigned> max_table(ss.scc_total);
|
||||
unsigned max_num = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned n = 0; n < ss.scc_total; ++n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!sm.accepting(n))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
bdd all = sm.useful_acc_of(n);
|
||||
bdd negall = aut->neg_acceptance_conditions();
|
||||
|
||||
// Compute a set of useless acceptance conditions.
|
||||
// If the acceptance combinations occurring in
|
||||
// the automata are { a, ab, abc, bd }, then
|
||||
// USEFUL contains (a&!b&!c&!d)|(a&b&!c&!d)|(a&b&c&!d)|(!a&b&!c&d)
|
||||
// ALL contains (a&!b&!c&!d)|(a&b&!c&!d)|(a&b&c&!d)|(!a&b&!c&d)
|
||||
// and we want to find that 'a' and 'b' are useless because
|
||||
// they always occur with 'c'.
|
||||
// The way we check if 'a' is useless that is to look whether
|
||||
// USEFUL implies (x -> a) for some other acceptance condition x.
|
||||
// The way we check if 'a' is useless is to look whether ALL
|
||||
// implies (x -> a) for some other acceptance condition x.
|
||||
bdd allconds = bdd_support(negall);
|
||||
bdd allcondscopy = allconds;
|
||||
bdd useless = bddtrue;
|
||||
while (allconds != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd a = bdd_ithvar(bdd_var(allconds));
|
||||
bdd others = allcondscopy;
|
||||
// Speed-up the computation of implied acceptance by
|
||||
// removing those that are always present. We detect
|
||||
// those that appear as conjunction of positive variables
|
||||
// at the start of ALL.
|
||||
bdd prefix = bdd_satprefix(all);
|
||||
if (prefix != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(prefix == bdd_support(prefix));
|
||||
allcondscopy = bdd_exist(allcondscopy, prefix);
|
||||
if (allcondscopy != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
useless &= prefix;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Never erase all conditions: at least keep one.
|
||||
useless &= bdd_high(prefix);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
allconds = bdd_exist(allconds, prefix);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Pick a non-useless acceptance condition a.
|
||||
bdd a = bdd_ithvar(bdd_var(allconds));
|
||||
// For all acceptance condition x that is not already useless...
|
||||
bdd others = allcondscopy;
|
||||
while (others != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd x = bdd_ithvar(bdd_var(others));
|
||||
if (x != a)
|
||||
// ... check whether it always implies a.
|
||||
if (x != a && bdd_implies(all, x >> a))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (bdd_implies(useful, x >> a))
|
||||
{
|
||||
// a is useless
|
||||
useful = bdd_exist(useful, a);
|
||||
// If so, a is useless.
|
||||
all = bdd_exist(all, a);
|
||||
useless &= a;
|
||||
allcondscopy = bdd_exist(allcondscopy, a);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
others = bdd_high(others);
|
||||
}
|
||||
allconds = bdd_high(allconds);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We never remove ALL acceptance conditions.
|
||||
// We never remove ALL acceptance marks.
|
||||
assert(negall == bddtrue || useless != bdd_support(negall));
|
||||
|
||||
useful = compute_all_acceptance_conditions(bdd_exist(negall, useless));
|
||||
bdd useful = bdd_exist(negall, useless);
|
||||
|
||||
// Go over all useful sets of acceptance marks, and give them
|
||||
// a number.
|
||||
unsigned num = 1;
|
||||
// First compute the number of acceptance conditions used.
|
||||
for (BDD c = useful.id(); c != 1; c = bdd_low(c))
|
||||
++num;
|
||||
max_table[n] = num;
|
||||
if (num > max_num)
|
||||
max_num = num;
|
||||
// Then number all of these acceptance conditions in the
|
||||
// reverse order. This makes sure that the associated number
|
||||
// varies in the same direction as the bdd variables, which in
|
||||
// turn makes sure we preserve the acceptance condition
|
||||
// ordering (which matters for degeneralization).
|
||||
for (BDD c = useful.id(); c != 1; c = bdd_low(c))
|
||||
remap_table[n].insert(std::make_pair(bdd_var(c), --num));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// In most cases we will create a tgba_explicit_string copy of the
|
||||
// initial tgba, but this is not very space efficient as the
|
||||
|
|
@ -190,8 +315,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
if (af)
|
||||
{
|
||||
filter_iter<tgba_explicit_formula> fi(af, sm, ss.useless_scc_map,
|
||||
useful, useless,
|
||||
remove_all_useless);
|
||||
remap_table, max_num,
|
||||
max_table, remove_all_useless);
|
||||
fi.run();
|
||||
tgba_explicit_formula* res = fi.result();
|
||||
res->merge_transitions();
|
||||
|
|
@ -202,8 +327,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
if (as)
|
||||
{
|
||||
filter_iter<tgba_explicit_string> fi(aut, sm, ss.useless_scc_map,
|
||||
useful, useless,
|
||||
remove_all_useless);
|
||||
remap_table, max_num,
|
||||
max_table, remove_all_useless);
|
||||
fi.run();
|
||||
tgba_explicit_string* res = fi.result();
|
||||
res->merge_transitions();
|
||||
|
|
@ -212,8 +337,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
filter_iter<tgba_explicit_number> fi(aut, sm, ss.useless_scc_map,
|
||||
useful, useless,
|
||||
remove_all_useless);
|
||||
remap_table, max_num,
|
||||
max_table, remove_all_useless);
|
||||
fi.run();
|
||||
tgba_explicit_number* res = fi.result();
|
||||
res->merge_transitions();
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
|||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2012 Laboratoire de Recherche et
|
||||
# Copyright (C) 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 Laboratoire de Recherche et
|
||||
# Développement de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ grep 'states: 21$' stdout
|
|||
# Note: after minimization with -TA -RT.
|
||||
# has 20 states and 89 transitions, after minimization.
|
||||
../ltl2tgba -ks -TA -RT -DS "$f" > stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 89$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 20$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 85$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 19$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
f='GFa & GFb & GFc & GFd & GFe & GFg'
|
||||
|
|
@ -119,12 +119,12 @@ grep 'states: 290$' stdout
|
|||
|
||||
#tests with artificial livelock state:
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -ks -TA -lv -DS "Gq|Gr|(G(q|FGp)&G(r|FG!p))" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 882$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 78$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 790$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 66$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TA -RT -ks -lv -DS "Gq|Gr|(G(q|FGp)&G(r|FG!p))" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 440$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 28$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 390$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 26$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TGTA -RT -ks 'Gq|Gr|(G(q|FGp)&G(r|FG!p))' >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 294$' stdout
|
||||
|
|
@ -153,16 +153,16 @@ grep 'states: 32$' stdout
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TA -RT -ks -in -R3 -x -DS "$f" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 436$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 36$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 450$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 38$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TA -RT -ks -sp -lv -R3 -x -DS "$f" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 537$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 38$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 551$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 40$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TA -ks -sp -lv -DS "$f" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 609$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 597$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 46$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ grep 'states: 32$' stdout
|
|||
g="G(F(GWaitLeft7 U Idle4) U (WaitLeft2 M IsEating2))"
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -TA -RT -ks -DS "$g" >stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 2147$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'transitions: 2133$' stdout
|
||||
grep 'states: 97$' stdout
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
# Copyright (C) 2011 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement de
|
||||
# l'Epita
|
||||
# Copyright (C) 2011, 2013 Laboratoire de Recherche et Developpement
|
||||
# de l'Epita
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ S4, S4, "!p1",;
|
|||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -X -R3 -b aut.txt > out.txt
|
||||
grep '^acc = "p1";$' out.txt
|
||||
grep '^acc = "[^"]*";$' out.txt
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Here, acceptances A and C can both be removed.
|
||||
|
|
@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ S1, S1, "c", A B C;
|
|||
S1, S1, "d", C D;
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -X -R3 -b aut2.txt > out2.txt
|
||||
grep '^acc = "B" "D";$' out2.txt || grep '^acc = "D" "B";$' out2.txt || exit 1
|
||||
grep '^acc = "." ".";$' out2.txt || exit 1
|
||||
# only 4 lines output, because the "b" and "c" lines have been merged.
|
||||
test `wc -l < out2.txt` = 4
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ S1, S1, "c", A B C;
|
|||
S1, S1, "d", B D;
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -X -R3 -b aut3.txt > out3.txt
|
||||
grep '^acc = "C" "D";$' out3.txt || grep '^acc = "D" "C";$' out3.txt || exit 1
|
||||
grep '^acc = "." ".";$' out3.txt || exit 1
|
||||
# only 4 lines output, because the "a" and "b" lines have been merged.
|
||||
test `wc -l < out3.txt` = 4
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -158,6 +158,4 @@ S6, S6, "(p1 & !p2) | (p3 & !p2)", ZZ "!p2";
|
|||
S6, S6, "p1 | p2 | p3", ZZ;
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
run 0 ../ltl2tgba -X -R3 -b aut7.txt > out7.txt
|
||||
# ZZ should disappear
|
||||
grep ZZ out7.txt && exit 1
|
||||
test `grep '^acc' out7.txt | wc -w` = 4
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue