doc: improve the twa class documentation
* spot/twa/twa.hh: More documentation. * doc/Doxyfile.in: Allow same doc for groups of methods.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ea348d8e80
commit
e1f5eb1fd6
2 changed files with 172 additions and 71 deletions
|
|
@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ IDL_PROPERTY_SUPPORT = NO
|
|||
# all members of a group must be documented explicitly.
|
||||
# The default value is: NO.
|
||||
|
||||
DISTRIBUTE_GROUP_DOC = NO
|
||||
DISTRIBUTE_GROUP_DOC = YES
|
||||
|
||||
# Set the SUBGROUPING tag to YES to allow class member groups of the same type
|
||||
# (for instance a group of public functions) to be put as a subgroup of that
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
241
spot/twa/twa.hh
241
spot/twa/twa.hh
|
|
@ -342,11 +342,51 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// \ingroup twa_essentials
|
||||
/// \brief Iterate over the successors of a state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This class provides the basic functionalities required to
|
||||
/// iterate over the successors of a state, as well as querying
|
||||
/// transition labels. Because transitions are never explicitely
|
||||
/// encoded, labels (conditions and acceptance conditions) can only
|
||||
/// be queried while iterating over the successors.
|
||||
/// This class provides the basic functionality required to iterate
|
||||
/// over the set of edges leaving a given state. Instance of
|
||||
/// twa_succ_iterator should normally not be created directly.
|
||||
/// Instead, they are created by passing a "source" state to
|
||||
/// twa::succ_iter(), which will create the instance of
|
||||
/// twa_succ_iterator to iterate over the successors of that state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This twa_succ_iterator class offers two types of services,
|
||||
/// offered by two groups of methods. The methods first(), next(),
|
||||
/// and done() allow iteration over the set of outgoing edges.
|
||||
/// The methods cond(), acc(), dst(), allow inspecting the current
|
||||
/// edge.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The twa_succ_iterator is usually subclassed so that iteration
|
||||
/// methods and accessor methods can be implemented differently in
|
||||
/// different automata. In particular, this interface allows
|
||||
/// computing the set of successor on the fly if needed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The iterator can be used to iterate over all successors in a
|
||||
/// loop as follows:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \code
|
||||
/// for (i->first(); !i->done(); i->next())
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// // use i->cond(), i->acc(), i->dst()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// \endcode
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If there are n successors, there will be 1 call to first(), n
|
||||
/// calls to next() and n+1 calls to done(), so a total of 2(n+1)
|
||||
/// calls to virtual methods just to handle the iteration. For this
|
||||
/// reason, we usually favor the following more efficient way of
|
||||
/// performing the same loop:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \code
|
||||
/// if (i->first())
|
||||
/// do
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// // use i->cond(), i->acc(), i->dst()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// while(i->next());
|
||||
/// \endcode
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This loops uses the return value of first() and next() to save
|
||||
/// n+1 calls to done().
|
||||
class SPOT_API twa_succ_iterator
|
||||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
|
@ -356,19 +396,22 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \name Iteration
|
||||
//@{
|
||||
///@{
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Position the iterator on the first successor (if any).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This method can be called several times to make multiple
|
||||
/// passes over successors.
|
||||
/// This method can be called several times in order to make
|
||||
/// multiple passes over successors.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \warning One should always call \c done() (or better: check
|
||||
/// the return value of first()) to ensure there is a successor,
|
||||
/// even after \c first(). A common trap is to assume that there
|
||||
/// is at least one successor: this is wrong.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return whether there is actually a successor
|
||||
/// \return true iff there is at least one successor
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If first() returns false, it is invalid to call next(),
|
||||
/// cond(), acc(), or dst().
|
||||
virtual bool first() = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Jump to the next successor (if any).
|
||||
|
|
@ -376,7 +419,11 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// \warning Again, one should always call \c done() (or better:
|
||||
/// check the return value of next()) ensure there is a successor.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return whether there is actually a successor
|
||||
/// \return true if the iterator moved to a new successor, false
|
||||
/// if the iterator could not move to a new successor.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If next() returns false, it is invalid to call next() again,
|
||||
/// or to call cond(), acc() or dst().
|
||||
virtual bool next() = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Check whether the iteration is finished.
|
||||
|
|
@ -384,42 +431,48 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// This function should be called after any call to \c first()
|
||||
/// or \c next() and before any enquiry about the current state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The usual way to do this is with a \c for loop.
|
||||
/// The typical use case of done() is in a \c for loop such as:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// for (s->first(); !s->done(); s->next())
|
||||
/// ...
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return false iff the iterator is pointing to a successor.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// It is incorrect to call done() if first() hasn't been called
|
||||
/// before. If done() returns true, it is invalid to call
|
||||
/// next(), cond(), acc(), or dst().
|
||||
virtual bool done() const = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
//@}
|
||||
///@}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \name Inspection
|
||||
//@{
|
||||
///@{
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Get the state of the current successor.
|
||||
/// \brief Get the destination state of the current edge.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that the same state may occur at different points
|
||||
/// in the iteration. These actually correspond to the same
|
||||
/// destination. It just means there were several transitions,
|
||||
/// with different conditions, leading to the same state.
|
||||
/// Each call to dst() (even several times on the same edge)
|
||||
/// creates a new state that has to be destroyed (see
|
||||
/// state::destroy()). by the caller after it is no longer used.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The returned state should be destroyed (see state::destroy)
|
||||
/// by the caller after it is no longer used.
|
||||
/// Note that the same state may occur at different points in the
|
||||
/// iteration, as different outgoing edges (usually with different
|
||||
/// labels or acceptance membership) may go to the same state.
|
||||
virtual const state* dst() const = 0;
|
||||
/// \brief Get the condition on the transition leading to this successor.
|
||||
/// \brief Get the condition on the edge leading to this successor.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is a boolean function of atomic propositions.
|
||||
virtual bdd cond() const = 0;
|
||||
/// \brief Get the acceptance conditions on the transition leading
|
||||
/// to this successor.
|
||||
/// \brief Get the acceptance mark of the edge leading to this
|
||||
/// successor.
|
||||
virtual acc_cond::mark_t acc() const = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
//@}
|
||||
///@}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
namespace internal
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// \brief Helper structure to iterate over the successor of a
|
||||
/// state using the on-the-flay interface.
|
||||
/// state using the on-the-fly interface.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This one emulates an STL-like iterator over the
|
||||
/// twa_succ_iterator interface.
|
||||
|
|
@ -478,31 +531,49 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// w is just a non-utf8 replacement for ω that should not be
|
||||
/// capitalized.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// TωAs are transition-based automata, meanings that not-only
|
||||
/// do they have labels on arcs, they also have an acceptance
|
||||
/// condition defined in term of sets of transitions.
|
||||
/// The acceptance condition can be anything supported by
|
||||
/// the HOA format (http://adl.github.io/hoaf/). The only
|
||||
/// restriction w.r.t. the format is that this class does
|
||||
/// not support alternating automata
|
||||
/// TωAs are transition-based automata, meanings that not-only do
|
||||
/// they have labels on edges, but they also have an acceptance
|
||||
/// condition defined in term of sets of transitions. The
|
||||
/// acceptance condition can be anything supported by the HOA format
|
||||
/// (http://adl.github.io/hoaf/). The only restriction w.r.t. the
|
||||
/// format is that this class does not support alternating automata.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Previous versions of Spot supported a type of automata called
|
||||
/// TGBA, which are TωA in which the acceptance condition is a set
|
||||
/// of sets of transitions that must be intersected infinitely
|
||||
/// often.
|
||||
/// of sets of transitions that must be visited infinitely often.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// In this version, TGBAs are now represented by TωAs for which
|
||||
/// <code>aut->acc().is_generalized_buchi())</code> returns true.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Browsing such automaton can be achieved using two functions:
|
||||
/// \c get_init_state, and \c succ. The former returns
|
||||
/// the initial state while the latter lists the
|
||||
/// successor states of any state.
|
||||
/// aut->acc().is_generalized_buchi()
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// returns true.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Browsing a TωA is usually achieved using two methods: \c
|
||||
/// get_init_state(), and succ(). The former returns the initial
|
||||
/// state while the latter allows iterating over the outgoing edges
|
||||
/// of any given state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that although this is a transition-based automata, we never
|
||||
/// represent transitions in the API! Transition data are
|
||||
/// represent edges in the API. Information about edges can be
|
||||
/// obtained by querying the iterator over the successors of a
|
||||
/// state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The interface presented here is what we call the on-the-fly
|
||||
/// interface of automata, because the TωA class can be subclassed
|
||||
/// to implement an object that computes its successors on-the-fly.
|
||||
/// The down-side is that all these methods are virtual, so you you
|
||||
/// pay the cost of virtual calls when iterating over automata
|
||||
/// constructed on-the-fly. Also the interface assumes that each
|
||||
/// successor state is a new object whose memory management is the
|
||||
/// responsibility of the caller, who should then call
|
||||
/// state::destroy() to release it.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If you want to work with a TωA that is explicitly stored as a
|
||||
/// graph in memory, use the spot::twa_graph subclass instead. A
|
||||
/// twa_graph object can be used as a spot::twa (using the
|
||||
/// on-the-fly interface, even though nothing needs to be
|
||||
/// constructed), but it also offers a faster interface that do not
|
||||
/// use virtual methods.
|
||||
class SPOT_API twa: public std::enable_shared_from_this<twa>
|
||||
{
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
|
|
@ -568,6 +639,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// The iterator has been allocated with \c new. It is the
|
||||
/// responsability of the caller to \c delete it when no
|
||||
/// longer needed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \see succ()
|
||||
virtual twa_succ_iterator*
|
||||
succ_iter(const state* local_state) const = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -575,11 +648,25 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// \brief Build an iterable over the successors of \a s.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is meant to be used as
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \code
|
||||
/// for (auto i: aut->succ(s))
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// /* i->dst() */
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// for (auto i: aut->succ(s))
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// // use i->cond(), i->acc(), i->dst()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// \endcode
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// and the above loop is in fact syntactic sugar for
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \code
|
||||
/// twa_succ_iterator* i = aut->succ_iter(s);
|
||||
/// if (i->first())
|
||||
/// do
|
||||
/// {
|
||||
/// // use i->cond(), i->acc(), i->dst()
|
||||
/// }
|
||||
/// while (i->next());
|
||||
/// aut->release_iter(i);
|
||||
/// \endcode
|
||||
succ_iterable
|
||||
succ(const state* s) const
|
||||
|
|
@ -605,7 +692,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// \return A formula which must be verified for all successors
|
||||
/// of \a state.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This can be as simple as \c bddtrue, or more completely
|
||||
/// This can be as simple as \c bddtrue, or more precisely
|
||||
/// the disjunction of the condition of all successors. This
|
||||
/// is used as an hint by \c succ_iter() to reduce the number
|
||||
/// of successor to compute in a product.
|
||||
|
|
@ -617,19 +704,37 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
|
||||
/// \brief Get the dictionary associated to the automaton.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Atomic propositions and acceptance conditions are represented
|
||||
/// as BDDs. The dictionary allows to map BDD variables back to
|
||||
/// formulas, and vice versa. This is useful when dealing with
|
||||
/// several automata (which may use the same BDD variable for
|
||||
/// different formula), or simply when printing.
|
||||
/// Automata are labeled by Boolean formulas over atomic
|
||||
/// propositions. These Boolean formula are represented as BDDs.
|
||||
/// The dictionary allows to map BDD variables back to atomic
|
||||
/// propositions, and vice versa.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Usually automata that are involved in the same computations
|
||||
/// should share their dictionaries so that operations between
|
||||
/// BDDs of the two automata work naturally.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// It is however possible to declare automata that use different
|
||||
/// sets of atomic propositions with different dictionaries. That
|
||||
/// way a BDD variable associated to some atomic proposition in
|
||||
/// one automaton might be reused for another atomic proposition
|
||||
/// in the other automaton.
|
||||
bdd_dict_ptr get_dict() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return dict_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Register an atomic proposition designated by formula \a ap.
|
||||
///@{
|
||||
/// \brief Register an atomic proposition designated by \a ap.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return The BDD variable number.
|
||||
/// This is the preferred way to declare that an automaton is using
|
||||
/// a given atomic proposition.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This adds the atomic proposition to the list of atomic
|
||||
/// proposition of the automaton, and also register it to the
|
||||
/// bdd_dict.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return The BDD variable number assigned for this atomic
|
||||
/// proposition.
|
||||
int register_ap(formula ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int res = dict_->has_registered_proposition(ap, this);
|
||||
|
|
@ -642,22 +747,20 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Register an atomic proposition designated by string \a ap.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \return The BDD variable number.
|
||||
int register_ap(std::string name)
|
||||
int register_ap(std::string ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return register_ap(formula::ap(name));
|
||||
return register_ap(formula::ap(ap));
|
||||
}
|
||||
///@}
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Get the vector of atomic propositions used by this
|
||||
/// \brief The vector of atomic propositions registered by this
|
||||
/// automaton.
|
||||
const std::vector<formula>& ap() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return aps_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The list of atomic propositions as a conjunction.
|
||||
/// \brief The set of atomic propositions as a conjunction.
|
||||
bdd ap_var() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return bddaps_;
|
||||
|
|
@ -665,9 +768,11 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
|
||||
/// \brief Format the state as a string for printing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This formating is the responsability of the automata
|
||||
/// that owns the state.
|
||||
virtual std::string format_state(const state* state) const = 0;
|
||||
/// Formating is the responsability of the automata that owns the
|
||||
/// state, so that state objects could be implemented as very
|
||||
/// small objects, maybe sharing data with other state objects via
|
||||
/// data structure stored in the automaton.
|
||||
virtual std::string format_state(const state* s) const = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Return a possible annotation for the transition
|
||||
/// pointed to by the iterator.
|
||||
|
|
@ -681,8 +786,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
/// Implementing this method is optional; the default annotation
|
||||
/// is the empty string.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This method is used for instance in print_dot(),
|
||||
/// and replay_twa_run().
|
||||
/// This method is used for instance in replay_twa_run().
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param t a non-done twa_succ_iterator for this automaton
|
||||
virtual std::string
|
||||
|
|
@ -704,9 +808,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
virtual state* project_state(const state* s,
|
||||
const const_twa_ptr& t) const;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// The acceptance condition of the automaton.
|
||||
/// @{
|
||||
///@{
|
||||
/// \brief The acceptance condition of the automaton.
|
||||
const acc_cond& acc() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return acc_;
|
||||
|
|
@ -716,7 +819,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
return acc_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
///@}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Check whether the language of the automaton is empty.
|
||||
virtual bool is_empty() const;
|
||||
|
|
@ -825,8 +928,6 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
std::vector<formula> aps_;
|
||||
bdd bddaps_;
|
||||
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
|
||||
/// Helper structure used to store property flags.
|
||||
struct bprop
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue