hoa: improve parser and scanner
* src/hoaparse/hoaparse.yy: Improve error reporting in case labeled edges are mixed with unlabeled edges. * src/hoaparse/hoascan.ll: Fix handling of nested comments. * src/tgbatest/hoaparse.test: More coverage.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0a21db5c30
commit
e7e21ae58f
3 changed files with 147 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ trans-label: label
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (res.has_state_label)
|
||||
{
|
||||
error(@1, "cannot label this transition because...");
|
||||
error(@1, "cannot label this edge because...");
|
||||
error(res.state_label_loc,
|
||||
"... the state is already labeled.");
|
||||
res.cur_label = res.state_label;
|
||||
|
|
@ -586,11 +586,30 @@ acc-sets:
|
|||
else
|
||||
$$ = $1 | res.h->aut->acc().mark($2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
labeled-edges: | labeled-edges labeled-edge
|
||||
|
||||
/* block of labeled-edges, with occasional (incorrect) unlabeled edge */
|
||||
labeled-edges: | some-labeled-edges
|
||||
some-labeled-edges: labeled-edge
|
||||
| some-labeled-edges labeled-edge
|
||||
| some-labeled-edges incorrectly-unlabeled-edge
|
||||
incorrectly-unlabeled-edge: checked-state-num acc-sig_opt
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd cond = bddtrue;
|
||||
if (!res.has_state_label)
|
||||
error(@$, "missing label for this edge "
|
||||
"(previous edge is labeled)");
|
||||
else
|
||||
cond = res.state_label;
|
||||
res.h->aut->new_transition(res.cur_state, $1,
|
||||
cond,
|
||||
$2 | res.acc_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
labeled-edge: trans-label checked-state-num acc-sig_opt
|
||||
{
|
||||
res.h->aut->new_transition(res.cur_state, $2,
|
||||
res.cur_label, $3 | res.acc_state);
|
||||
if (res.cur_label != bddfalse)
|
||||
res.h->aut->new_transition(res.cur_state, $2,
|
||||
res.cur_label,
|
||||
$3 | res.acc_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
| trans-label state-conj-2 acc-sig_opt
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -598,9 +617,12 @@ labeled-edge: trans-label checked-state-num acc-sig_opt
|
|||
YYABORT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We never have zero unlabeled edges, these are considered as zero
|
||||
labeled edges. */
|
||||
unlabeled-edges: unlabeled-edge | unlabeled-edges unlabeled-edge
|
||||
/* Block of unlabeled edge, with occasional (incorrect) labeled
|
||||
edge. We never have zero unlabeled edges, these are considered as
|
||||
zero labeled edges. */
|
||||
unlabeled-edges: unlabeled-edge
|
||||
| unlabeled-edges unlabeled-edge
|
||||
| unlabeled-edges incorrectly-labeled-edge
|
||||
unlabeled-edge: checked-state-num acc-sig_opt
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd cond;
|
||||
|
|
@ -623,14 +645,20 @@ unlabeled-edge: checked-state-num acc-sig_opt
|
|||
cond = *res.cur_guard++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
res.h->aut->new_transition(res.cur_state, $1,
|
||||
cond, $2 | res.acc_state);
|
||||
if (cond != bddfalse)
|
||||
res.h->aut->new_transition(res.cur_state, $1,
|
||||
cond, $2 | res.acc_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
| state-conj-2 acc-sig_opt
|
||||
{
|
||||
error(@1, "alternation is not yet supported");
|
||||
YYABORT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
incorrectly-labeled-edge: trans-label unlabeled-edge
|
||||
{
|
||||
error(@1, "ignoring this label, because previous"
|
||||
" edge has no label");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
%%
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue