rename src/ as spot/ and use include <spot/...>
* NEWS: Mention the change. * src/: Rename as ... * spot/: ... this, adjust all headers to include <spot/...> instead of "...", and adjust all Makefile.am to search headers from the top-level directory. * HACKING: Add conventions about #include. * spot/sanity/style.test: Add a few more grep to catch cases that do not follow these conventions. * .gitignore, Makefile.am, README, bench/stutter/Makefile.am, bench/stutter/stutter_invariance_formulas.cc, bench/stutter/stutter_invariance_randomgraph.cc, configure.ac, debian/rules, doc/Doxyfile.in, doc/Makefile.am, doc/org/.dir-locals.el.in, doc/org/g++wrap.in, doc/org/init.el.in, doc/org/tut01.org, doc/org/tut02.org, doc/org/tut03.org, doc/org/tut10.org, doc/org/tut20.org, doc/org/tut21.org, doc/org/tut22.org, doc/org/tut30.org, iface/ltsmin/Makefile.am, iface/ltsmin/kripke.test, iface/ltsmin/ltsmin.cc, iface/ltsmin/ltsmin.hh, iface/ltsmin/modelcheck.cc, wrap/python/Makefile.am, wrap/python/ajax/spotcgi.in, wrap/python/spot_impl.i, wrap/python/tests/ltl2tgba.py, wrap/python/tests/randgen.py, wrap/python/tests/run.in: Adjust.
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
parent
1fddfe60ec
commit
f120dd3206
529 changed files with 1308 additions and 1262 deletions
|
|
@ -1,150 +0,0 @@
|
|||
// -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
||||
// Copyright (C) 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 Laboratoire de Recherche et
|
||||
// Développement de l'Epita (LRDE).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This file is part of Spot, a model checking library.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Spot is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
|
||||
// under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
||||
// the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
||||
// (at your option) any later version.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Spot is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
|
||||
// ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY
|
||||
// or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public
|
||||
// License for more details.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
||||
// along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
|
||||
#pragma once
|
||||
|
||||
#include "misc/common.hh"
|
||||
#include "twa/twagraph.hh"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// \addtogroup twa_reduction
|
||||
/// @{
|
||||
|
||||
/// @{
|
||||
/// \brief Attempt to reduce the automaton by direct simulation.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// When the suffixes (letter and acceptance conditions) reachable
|
||||
/// from one state are included in the suffixes seen by another one,
|
||||
/// the former state can be merged into the latter. The algorithm is
|
||||
/// based on the following paper, but generalized to handle TωA
|
||||
/// directly.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/** \verbatim
|
||||
@InProceedings{ etessami.00.concur,
|
||||
author = {Kousha Etessami and Gerard J. Holzmann},
|
||||
title = {Optimizing {B\"u}chi Automata},
|
||||
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on
|
||||
Concurrency Theory (Concur'00)},
|
||||
pages = {153--167},
|
||||
year = {2000},
|
||||
editor = {C. Palamidessi},
|
||||
volume = {1877},
|
||||
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
|
||||
address = {Pennsylvania, USA},
|
||||
publisher = {Springer-Verlag}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\endverbatim */
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Our reconstruction of the quotient automaton based on this
|
||||
/// suffix-inclusion relation will also improve determinism.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We recommend to call scc_filter() to first simplify the
|
||||
/// automaton that should be reduced by simulation.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Reducing an automaton by simulation does not change the number
|
||||
/// of acceptance conditions. In some rare cases (1 out of more
|
||||
/// than 500 in our benchmark), the reduced automaton will use more
|
||||
/// acceptance conditions than necessary, and running scc_filter()
|
||||
/// again afterwards will remove these superfluous conditions.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param automaton the automaton to simulate.
|
||||
/// \return a new automaton which is at worst a copy of the received
|
||||
/// one
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
simulation(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
simulation_sba(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
|
||||
/// @{
|
||||
/// \brief Attempt to reduce the automaton by reverse simulation.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// When the prefixes (letter and acceptance conditions) leading to
|
||||
/// one state are included in the prefixes leading to one, the former
|
||||
/// state can be merged into the latter.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Reverse simulation is discussed in the following paper,
|
||||
/// but generalized to handle TωA directly.
|
||||
/** \verbatim
|
||||
@InProceedings{ somenzi.00.cav,
|
||||
author = {Fabio Somenzi and Roderick Bloem},
|
||||
title = {Efficient {B\"u}chi Automata for {LTL} Formul{\ae}},
|
||||
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on
|
||||
Computer Aided Verification (CAV'00)},
|
||||
pages = {247--263},
|
||||
year = {2000},
|
||||
volume = {1855},
|
||||
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
|
||||
address = {Chicago, Illinois, USA},
|
||||
publisher = {Springer-Verlag}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\endverbatim */
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Our reconstruction of the quotient automaton based on this
|
||||
/// prefix-inclusion relation will also improve codeterminism.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We recommend to call scc_filter() to first simplify the
|
||||
/// automaton that should be reduced by cosimulation.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Reducing an automaton by reverse simulation (1) does not change
|
||||
/// the number of acceptance conditions so the resulting automaton
|
||||
/// may have superfluous acceptance conditions, and (2) can create
|
||||
/// SCCs that are terminal and non-accepting. For these reasons,
|
||||
/// you should call scc_filer() to prune useless SCCs and acceptance
|
||||
/// conditions afterwards.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If you plan to run both simulation() and cosimulation() on the
|
||||
/// same automaton, you should start with simulation() so that the
|
||||
/// codeterminism improvements achieved by cosimulation() does not
|
||||
/// hinder the determinism improvements attempted by simulation().
|
||||
/// (This of course assumes that you prefer determinism over
|
||||
/// codeterminism.)
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param automaton the automaton to simulate.
|
||||
/// \return a new automaton which is at worst a copy of the received
|
||||
/// one
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
cosimulation(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
cosimulation_sba(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
|
||||
/// @{
|
||||
/// \brief Iterate simulation() and cosimulation().
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Runs simulation(), cosimulation(), and scc_filter() in a loop,
|
||||
/// until the automaton does not change size (states and
|
||||
/// transitions).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We recommend to call scc_filter() to first simplify the
|
||||
/// automaton that should be reduced by iterated simulations, since
|
||||
/// this algorithm will only call scc_filter() at the end of the
|
||||
/// loop.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param automaton the automaton to simulate.
|
||||
/// \return a new automaton which is at worst a copy of the received
|
||||
/// one
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
iterated_simulations(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
SPOT_API twa_graph_ptr
|
||||
iterated_simulations_sba(const const_twa_graph_ptr& automaton);
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
|
||||
} // End namespace spot.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue