alternation: implement remove_alternation() for weak alt automata
This mixes the subset construction (for 1-state rejecting SCCs) and the breakpoint construction (for larger rejecting SCCs). The algorithm should probably be rewritten in a cleaner and more efficient way, but that should do for a first version. It should be easy to extend it to support Büchi acceptance (since the breakpoint construction works for this) when we need it. * spot/twaalgos/alternation.hh, spot/twaalgos/alternation.cc (remove_alternation): New function. * tests/python/alternation.ipynb: New file. * tests/Makefile.am, doc/org/tut.org: Add it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
582d455c23
commit
fa06cfa303
5 changed files with 2206 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -75,3 +75,4 @@ real notebooks instead.
|
|||
automata.
|
||||
- [[https://spot.lrde.epita.fr/ipynb/atva16-fig2a.html][=atva16-fig2a.ipynb=]] first example from our [[https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~adl/dl/adl/duret.16.atva2.pdf][ATVA'16 tool paper]].
|
||||
- [[https://spot.lrde.epita.fr/ipynb/atva16-fig2b.html][=atva16-fig2b.ipynb=]] second example from our [[https://www.lrde.epita.fr/~adl/dl/adl/duret.16.atva2.pdf][ATVA'16 tool paper]].
|
||||
- [[https://spot.lrde.epita.fr/ipynb/alternation.html][=alternation.ipynb=]] examples of alternating automata.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
|
|||
// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
||||
// along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
||||
|
||||
#include <spot/twaalgos/alternation.hh>
|
||||
#include <algorithm>
|
||||
#include <sstream>
|
||||
#include <spot/twaalgos/alternation.hh>
|
||||
#include <spot/misc/minato.hh>
|
||||
#include <spot/twaalgos/strength.hh>
|
||||
|
||||
namespace spot
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
@ -62,6 +64,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void outedge_combiner::new_dests(unsigned st, bdd out) const
|
||||
{
|
||||
minato_isop isop(out);
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,4 +89,394 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
namespace
|
||||
{
|
||||
class alternation_remover final
|
||||
{
|
||||
protected:
|
||||
const_twa_graph_ptr aut_;
|
||||
scc_info si_;
|
||||
enum scc_class : char { accept, reject_1, reject_more };
|
||||
std::vector<scc_class> class_of_;
|
||||
bool has_reject_more_ = false;
|
||||
unsigned reject_1_count_ = 0;
|
||||
std::set<unsigned> true_states_;
|
||||
|
||||
void classify_each_scc()
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto& g = aut_->get_graph();
|
||||
unsigned sc = si_.scc_count();
|
||||
for (unsigned n = 0; n < sc; ++n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (si_.is_trivial(n))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (si_.states_of(n).size() == 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (si_.is_rejecting_scc(n))
|
||||
{
|
||||
class_of_[n] = scc_class::reject_1;
|
||||
++reject_1_count_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// For size one, scc_info should always be able to
|
||||
// decide rejecting/accepting.
|
||||
assert(si_.is_accepting_scc(n));
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned s = si_.states_of(n).front();
|
||||
auto& ss = g.state_storage(s);
|
||||
if (ss.succ == ss.succ_tail)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto& es = g.edge_storage(ss.succ);
|
||||
if (es.cond == bddtrue && !aut_->is_univ_dest(es.dst))
|
||||
true_states_.emplace(s);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t m;
|
||||
bool first = true;
|
||||
for (auto src: si_.states_of(n))
|
||||
for (auto& t: aut_->out(src))
|
||||
for (unsigned d: aut_->univ_dests(t.dst))
|
||||
if (si_.scc_of(d) == n)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (first)
|
||||
{
|
||||
first = false;
|
||||
m = t.acc;
|
||||
if (!aut_->acc().accepting(m))
|
||||
{
|
||||
class_of_[n] = reject_more;
|
||||
has_reject_more_ = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// In case of a universal edge we only
|
||||
// need to check the first destination
|
||||
// inside the SCC, because the other
|
||||
// have the same t.acc.
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (m != t.acc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw std::runtime_error
|
||||
("alternation_removal() only work with weak "
|
||||
"alternating automata");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<int> state_to_var_;
|
||||
std::map<int, unsigned> var_to_state_;
|
||||
std::vector<int> scc_to_var_;
|
||||
std::map<int, acc_cond::mark_t> var_to_mark_;
|
||||
bdd all_vars_;
|
||||
bdd all_marks_;
|
||||
bdd all_states_;
|
||||
|
||||
void allocate_state_vars()
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto d = aut_->get_dict();
|
||||
// We need one BDD variable per possible output state. If
|
||||
// that state is in a reject_more SCC we actually use two
|
||||
// variables for the breakpoint.
|
||||
unsigned ns = aut_->num_states();
|
||||
state_to_var_.reserve(ns);
|
||||
bdd all_states = bddtrue;
|
||||
for (unsigned s = 0; s < ns; ++s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!si_.reachable_state(s))
|
||||
{
|
||||
state_to_var_.push_back(0);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
scc_class c = class_of_[si_.scc_of(s)];
|
||||
bool r = c == scc_class::reject_more;
|
||||
int v = d->register_anonymous_variables(1 + r, this);
|
||||
state_to_var_.push_back(v);
|
||||
var_to_state_[v] = s;
|
||||
all_states &= bdd_ithvar(v);
|
||||
if (r)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var_to_state_[v + 1] = ~s;
|
||||
all_states &= bdd_ithvar(v + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We also use one BDD variable per reject_1 SCC. Each of
|
||||
// these variables will represent a bit in mark_t. We reserve
|
||||
// the first bit for the break_point construction if we have
|
||||
// some reject_more SCC.
|
||||
unsigned nc = si_.scc_count();
|
||||
scc_to_var_.reserve(nc);
|
||||
unsigned mark_pos = has_reject_more_;
|
||||
bdd all_marks = bddtrue;
|
||||
for (unsigned s = 0; s < nc; ++s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc_class c = class_of_[s];
|
||||
if (c == scc_class::reject_1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int v = d->register_anonymous_variables(1, this);
|
||||
scc_to_var_.emplace_back(v);
|
||||
var_to_mark_.emplace(v, acc_cond::mark_t({mark_pos++}));
|
||||
bdd bv = bdd_ithvar(v);
|
||||
all_marks &= bv;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
scc_to_var_.emplace_back(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
all_marks_ = all_marks;
|
||||
all_states_ = all_states;
|
||||
all_vars_ = all_states & all_marks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::map<unsigned, bdd> state_as_bdd_cache_;
|
||||
|
||||
bdd state_as_bdd(unsigned s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto p = state_as_bdd_cache_.emplace(s, bddfalse);
|
||||
if (!p.second)
|
||||
return p.first->second;
|
||||
|
||||
bool marked = (int)s < 0;
|
||||
if (marked)
|
||||
s = ~s;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned scc_s = si_.scc_of(s);
|
||||
bdd res = bddfalse;
|
||||
for (auto& e: aut_->out(s))
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd dest = bddtrue;
|
||||
for (unsigned d: aut_->univ_dests(e.dst))
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned scc_d = si_.scc_of(d);
|
||||
scc_class c = class_of_[scc_d];
|
||||
bool mark =
|
||||
marked && (scc_s == scc_d) && (c == scc_class::reject_more);
|
||||
dest &= bdd_ithvar(state_to_var_[d] + mark);
|
||||
if (c == scc_class::reject_1 && scc_s == scc_d)
|
||||
dest &= bdd_ithvar(scc_to_var_[scc_s]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
res |= e.cond & dest;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
p.first->second = res;
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t bdd_to_state(bdd b, std::vector<unsigned>& s)
|
||||
{
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t m = 0U;
|
||||
while (b != bddtrue)
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(bdd_low(b) == bddfalse);
|
||||
int v = bdd_var(b);
|
||||
auto it = var_to_state_.find(v);
|
||||
if (it != var_to_state_.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
s.push_back(it->second);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto it2 = var_to_mark_.find(v);
|
||||
assert(it2 != var_to_mark_.end());
|
||||
m |= it2->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
b = bdd_high(b);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return m;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void simplify_state_set(std::vector<unsigned>& ss)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto to_remove = true_states_;
|
||||
for (unsigned i: ss)
|
||||
if ((int)i < 0)
|
||||
to_remove.emplace(~i);
|
||||
|
||||
auto i =
|
||||
std::remove_if(ss.begin(), ss.end(),
|
||||
[&] (unsigned s) {
|
||||
return to_remove.find(s) != to_remove.end();
|
||||
});
|
||||
ss.erase(i, ss.end());
|
||||
std::sort(ss.begin(), ss.end());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool has_mark(const std::vector<unsigned>& ss)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (unsigned i: ss)
|
||||
if ((int)i < 0)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void set_mark(std::vector<unsigned>& ss)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (unsigned& s: ss)
|
||||
if (class_of_[si_.scc_of(s)] == scc_class::reject_more)
|
||||
s = ~s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
alternation_remover(const const_twa_graph_ptr& aut)
|
||||
: aut_(aut), si_(aut), class_of_(si_.scc_count(), scc_class::accept)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
~alternation_remover()
|
||||
{
|
||||
aut_->get_dict()->unregister_all_my_variables(this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
twa_graph_ptr run(bool named_states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// First, we classify each SCC into three possible classes:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// 1) trivial or accepting
|
||||
// 2) rejecting of size 1
|
||||
// 3) rejecting of size >1
|
||||
classify_each_scc();
|
||||
|
||||
// Rejecting SCCs of size 1 can be handled using genralized
|
||||
// Büchi acceptance, using one set per SCC, as in Gastin &
|
||||
// Oddoux CAV'01. See also Boker & et al. ICALP'10. Larger
|
||||
// rejecting SCCs require a more expensive procedure known as
|
||||
// the break point construction. See Miyano & Hayashi (TCS
|
||||
// 1984). We are currently combining the two constructions.
|
||||
auto res = make_twa_graph(aut_->get_dict());
|
||||
res->copy_ap_of(aut_);
|
||||
// We preserve deterministic-like properties, and
|
||||
// stutter-invariance.
|
||||
res->prop_copy(aut_, {false, false, true, true});
|
||||
res->set_generalized_buchi(has_reject_more_ + reject_1_count_);
|
||||
|
||||
// We for easier computation of outgoing sets, we will
|
||||
// represent states using BDD variables.
|
||||
allocate_state_vars();
|
||||
|
||||
// Conversion between state-sets and states.
|
||||
typedef std::vector<unsigned> state_set;
|
||||
std::vector<state_set> s_to_ss;
|
||||
std::map<state_set, unsigned> ss_to_s;
|
||||
std::stack<unsigned> todo;
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<std::string>* state_name = nullptr;
|
||||
if (named_states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
state_name = new std::vector<std::string>();
|
||||
res->set_named_prop("state-names", state_name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto new_state = [&](state_set& ss, bool& need_mark)
|
||||
{
|
||||
simplify_state_set(ss);
|
||||
|
||||
if (has_reject_more_)
|
||||
{
|
||||
need_mark = has_mark(ss);
|
||||
if (!need_mark)
|
||||
set_mark(ss);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
auto p = ss_to_s.emplace(ss, 0);
|
||||
if (!p.second)
|
||||
return p.first->second;
|
||||
unsigned s = res->new_state();
|
||||
assert(s == s_to_ss.size());
|
||||
p.first->second = s;
|
||||
s_to_ss.emplace_back(ss);
|
||||
todo.emplace(s);
|
||||
|
||||
if (named_states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::ostringstream os;
|
||||
bool notfirst = false;
|
||||
for (unsigned s: ss)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (notfirst)
|
||||
os << ',';
|
||||
else
|
||||
notfirst = true;
|
||||
if ((int)s < 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
os << '~';
|
||||
s = ~s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
os << s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!notfirst)
|
||||
os << "{}";
|
||||
state_name->emplace_back(os.str());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return s;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const auto& i = aut_->univ_dests(aut_->get_init_state_number());
|
||||
state_set is(i.begin(), i.end());
|
||||
bool has_mark = false;
|
||||
res->set_init_state(new_state(is, has_mark));
|
||||
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t all_marks = res->acc().all_sets();
|
||||
|
||||
state_set v;
|
||||
while (!todo.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned s = todo.top();
|
||||
todo.pop();
|
||||
|
||||
bdd bs = bddtrue;
|
||||
for (unsigned se: s_to_ss[s])
|
||||
bs &= state_as_bdd(se);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
bdd ap = bdd_exist(bdd_support(bs), all_vars_);
|
||||
bdd all_letters = bdd_exist(bs, all_vars_);
|
||||
|
||||
// First loop over all possible valuations atomic properties.
|
||||
while (all_letters != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd oneletter = bdd_satoneset(all_letters, ap, bddtrue);
|
||||
all_letters -= oneletter;
|
||||
|
||||
minato_isop isop(bs & oneletter);
|
||||
bdd cube;
|
||||
while ((cube = isop.next()) != bddfalse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bdd cond = bdd_exist(cube, all_vars_);
|
||||
bdd dest = bdd_existcomp(cube, all_vars_);
|
||||
v.clear();
|
||||
acc_cond::mark_t m = bdd_to_state(dest, v);
|
||||
unsigned d = new_state(v, has_mark);
|
||||
if (has_mark)
|
||||
m.set(0);
|
||||
res->new_edge(s, d, cond, all_marks - m);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
res->merge_edges();
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
twa_graph_ptr remove_alternation(const const_twa_graph_ptr& aut,
|
||||
bool named_states)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!aut->is_alternating())
|
||||
// Nothing to do, why was this function called at all?
|
||||
return std::const_pointer_cast<twa_graph>(aut);
|
||||
|
||||
alternation_remover ar(aut);
|
||||
return ar.run(named_states);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -90,7 +90,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
/// @}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/// \brief Remove universal edges from an automaton.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This procedure is restricted to weak alternating automata as
|
||||
/// input, and produces TGBAs as output. (Generalized Büchi
|
||||
/// acceptance is only used in presence of size-1 rejecting-SCCs.)
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// \param named_states name each state for easier debugging
|
||||
SPOT_API
|
||||
twa_graph_ptr remove_alternation(const const_twa_graph_ptr& aut,
|
||||
bool named_states = false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ if USE_PYTHON
|
|||
TESTS_ipython = \
|
||||
python/acc_cond.ipynb \
|
||||
python/accparse.ipynb \
|
||||
python/alternation.ipynb \
|
||||
python/atva16-fig2a.ipynb \
|
||||
python/atva16-fig2b.ipynb \
|
||||
python/automata-io.ipynb \
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
1799
tests/python/alternation.ipynb
Normal file
1799
tests/python/alternation.ipynb
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue