Speedup syntactic_implication() by using a cache.
* src/ltlvisit/syntimpl.hh (syntactic_implication, syntactic_implication_neg): Move as member of ... (syntactic_implication_cache): ... this new class, that holds a cache of results to speedup these functions. * src/ltlvisit/syntimpl.cc: Adjust to use (lookup, populate, and cleanup) the cache. * src/ltltest/syntimpl.cc: Likewise. * src/ltlvisit/reduce.hh (reduce): Take an optional syntactic_implication_cache parameter. * src/ltlvisit/reduce.cc: Adjust to use a syntactic_implication_cache. * src/ltltest/equals.cc: Call dump_instances() to help debugging.
This commit is contained in:
parent
20c088a45a
commit
4ef7805e73
6 changed files with 211 additions and 99 deletions
|
|
@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor(const formula *f)
|
||||
: result_(false), f(f)
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor(const formula *f,
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache* c)
|
||||
: result_(false), f(f), c(c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -100,16 +101,16 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return;
|
||||
const unop* op = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (op->op() == unop::X)
|
||||
result_ = syntactic_implication(op->child(), f1);
|
||||
result_ = c->syntactic_implication(op->child(), f1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::F:
|
||||
/* F(a) = true U a */
|
||||
result_ = syntactic_implication(f, f1);
|
||||
result_ = c->syntactic_implication(f, f1);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::G:
|
||||
/* G(a) = false R a */
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f, constant::false_instance()))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f, constant::false_instance()))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::Finish:
|
||||
|
|
@ -137,7 +138,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return;
|
||||
case binop::U:
|
||||
case binop::W:
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::R:
|
||||
|
|
@ -145,8 +146,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
const binop* fb = static_cast<const binop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fb->op() == binop::R
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fb->first(), f1)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fb->second(), f2))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fb->first(), f1)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fb->second(), f2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -157,14 +158,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu->op() == unop::G
|
||||
&& f1 == constant::false_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fu->child(), f2))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fu->child(), f2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f, f1)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f, f1)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::M:
|
||||
|
|
@ -172,8 +173,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
const binop* fb = static_cast<const binop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fb->op() == binop::M
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fb->first(), f1)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fb->second(), f2))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fb->first(), f1)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fb->second(), f2))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -184,14 +185,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu->op() == unop::F
|
||||
&& f2 == constant::true_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(fu->child(), f1))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(fu->child(), f1))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f, f1)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f, f1)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f, f2))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -214,13 +215,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
case multop::And:
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < mos; ++i)
|
||||
if (!syntactic_implication(f, mo->nth(i)))
|
||||
if (!c->syntactic_implication(f, mo->nth(i)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case multop::Or:
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < mos && !result_; ++i)
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f, mo->nth(i)))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f, mo->nth(i)))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case multop::Concat:
|
||||
|
|
@ -233,6 +234,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
protected:
|
||||
bool result_; /* true if f < f1, false otherwise. */
|
||||
const formula* f;
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache* c;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
|
|
@ -241,8 +243,9 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
public:
|
||||
|
||||
inf_left_recurse_visitor(const formula *f)
|
||||
: result_(false), f(f)
|
||||
inf_left_recurse_visitor(const formula *f,
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache* c)
|
||||
: result_(false), f(f), c(c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -258,8 +261,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
return false;
|
||||
const binop* fb = static_cast<const binop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fb->op() == f2->op()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2->first(), fb->first())
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2->second(), fb->second()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2->first(), fb->first())
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2->second(), fb->second()))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -281,7 +284,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
void
|
||||
visit(const atomic_prop* ap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(ap);
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(ap, c);
|
||||
const_cast<formula*>(f)->accept(v);
|
||||
result_ = v.result();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -292,10 +295,10 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
visit(const constant* c)
|
||||
visit(const constant* cst)
|
||||
{
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(c);
|
||||
switch (c->val())
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(cst, c);
|
||||
switch (cst->val())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case constant::True:
|
||||
const_cast<formula*>(f)->accept(v);
|
||||
|
|
@ -316,7 +319,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
visit(const unop* uo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const formula* f1 = uo->child();
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(uo);
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v(uo, c);
|
||||
switch (uo->op())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case unop::Not:
|
||||
|
|
@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
const unop* op = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (op->op() == unop::X)
|
||||
result_ = syntactic_implication(f1, op->child());
|
||||
result_ = c->syntactic_implication(f1, op->child());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case unop::F:
|
||||
|
|
@ -343,7 +346,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
tmp->destroy();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(tmp, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(tmp, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
tmp->destroy();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -360,7 +363,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
tmp->destroy();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(tmp, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(tmp, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
tmp->destroy();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -400,8 +403,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
const binop* fb = static_cast<const binop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fb->op() == binop::U
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f1, fb->first())
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, fb->second()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f1, fb->first())
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, fb->second()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -412,14 +415,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu->op() == unop::F
|
||||
&& f1 == constant::true_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, fu->child()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, fu->child()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f1, f)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f1, f)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::W:
|
||||
|
|
@ -428,8 +431,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
const binop* fb = static_cast<const binop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fb->op() == binop::W
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f1, fb->first())
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, fb->second()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f1, fb->first())
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, fb->second()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
@ -440,14 +443,14 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu && fu->op() == unop::G
|
||||
&& f2 == constant::false_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f1, fu->child()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f1, fu->child()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f1, f)
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f1, f)
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::R:
|
||||
|
|
@ -456,13 +459,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu->op() == unop::G
|
||||
&& f1 == constant::false_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f2, fu->child()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f2, fu->child()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
case binop::M:
|
||||
|
|
@ -471,13 +474,13 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
const unop* fu = static_cast<const unop*>(f);
|
||||
if (fu->op() == unop::F
|
||||
&& f2 == constant::true_instance()
|
||||
&& syntactic_implication(f1, fu->child()))
|
||||
&& c->syntactic_implication(f1, fu->child()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(f2, f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -500,12 +503,12 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
{
|
||||
case multop::And:
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; (i < mos) && !result_; ++i)
|
||||
if (syntactic_implication(mo->nth(i), f))
|
||||
if (c->syntactic_implication(mo->nth(i), f))
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case multop::Or:
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < mos; ++i)
|
||||
if (!syntactic_implication(mo->nth(i), f))
|
||||
if (!c->syntactic_implication(mo->nth(i), f))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
result_ = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
@ -519,6 +522,7 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
protected:
|
||||
bool result_; /* true if f1 < f, 1 otherwise. */
|
||||
const formula* f;
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache* c;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
} // anonymous
|
||||
|
|
@ -526,7 +530,8 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
// This is called by syntactic_implication() after the
|
||||
// formulae have been normalized.
|
||||
bool
|
||||
syntactic_implication(const formula* f1, const formula* f2)
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache::syntactic_implication(const formula* f1,
|
||||
const formula* f2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (f1 == f2)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
|
@ -534,22 +539,43 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
|| f1 == constant::false_instance())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
inf_left_recurse_visitor v1(f2);
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v2(f1);
|
||||
// Cache lookup
|
||||
{
|
||||
pairf p(f1, f2);
|
||||
cache_t::const_iterator i = cache_.find(p);
|
||||
if (i != cache_.end())
|
||||
return i->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool result = false;
|
||||
|
||||
inf_left_recurse_visitor v1(f2, this);
|
||||
const_cast<formula*>(f1)->accept(v1);
|
||||
if (v1.result())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
{
|
||||
result = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
inf_right_recurse_visitor v2(f1, this);
|
||||
const_cast<formula*>(f2)->accept(v2);
|
||||
if (v2.result())
|
||||
result = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const_cast<formula*>(f2)->accept(v2);
|
||||
if (v2.result())
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
// Cache result
|
||||
{
|
||||
pairf p(f1->clone(), f2->clone());
|
||||
cache_[p] = result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool
|
||||
syntactic_implication_neg(const formula* f1, const formula* f2, bool right)
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache::syntactic_implication_neg(const formula* f1,
|
||||
const formula* f2,
|
||||
bool right)
|
||||
{
|
||||
formula* l = f1->clone();
|
||||
formula* r = f2->clone();
|
||||
|
|
@ -558,6 +584,20 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
else
|
||||
l = unop::instance(unop::Not, l);
|
||||
|
||||
// Cache lookup
|
||||
{
|
||||
pairf p(l, r);
|
||||
cache_t::const_iterator i = cache_.find(p);
|
||||
if (i != cache_.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
l->destroy();
|
||||
r->destroy();
|
||||
return i->second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Save the cache key for latter.
|
||||
pairf p(l->clone(), r->clone());
|
||||
|
||||
formula* tmp = unabbreviate_logic(l);
|
||||
l->destroy();
|
||||
l = simplify_f_g(tmp);
|
||||
|
|
@ -577,7 +617,33 @@ namespace spot
|
|||
bool result = syntactic_implication(l, r);
|
||||
l->destroy();
|
||||
r->destroy();
|
||||
|
||||
// Cache result if is has not be done by syntactic_implication() already.
|
||||
if (l != p.first || r != p.second)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cache_[p] = result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
p.first->destroy();
|
||||
p.second->destroy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
syntactic_implication_cache::~syntactic_implication_cache()
|
||||
{
|
||||
cache_t::const_iterator i = cache_.begin();
|
||||
while (i != cache_.end())
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Advance the iterator before deleting the key.
|
||||
pairf p = i->first;
|
||||
++i;
|
||||
|
||||
p.first->destroy();
|
||||
p.second->destroy();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue