102 lines
2.9 KiB
Org Mode
102 lines
2.9 KiB
Org Mode
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
#+TITLE: Testing the equivalence of two formulas
|
|
#+DESCRIPTION: Code example for testing the equivalence of two LTL or PSL formulas
|
|
#+SETUPFILE: setup.org
|
|
#+HTML_LINK_UP: tut.html
|
|
|
|
This page shows how to test whether two LTL/PSL formulas are
|
|
equivalent, i.e., if they denote the same languages.
|
|
|
|
* Shell
|
|
|
|
Using a =ltlfilt= you can use =--equivalent-to=f= to filter a list of
|
|
LTL formula and retain only those equivalent to =f=. So this gives an easy
|
|
way to test the equivalence of two formulas:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC sh :results verbatim :exports both
|
|
ltlfilt -f '(a U b) U a' --equivalent-to 'b U a'
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: (a U b) U a
|
|
|
|
Since the input formula was output, it means it is equivalent to =b U
|
|
a=. You may want to add =-c= to count the number of formula output if
|
|
you prefer a 1/0 answer:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC sh :results verbatim :exports both
|
|
ltlfilt -c -f '(a U b) U a' --equivalent-to 'b U a'
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: 1
|
|
|
|
Or use =-q= if you only care about the exit status of =ltlfilt=: the
|
|
exist status is =0= if some formula matched, and =1= if no formula
|
|
matched. (The effect of these =-c= and =-q= options should be
|
|
familiar to =grep= users.)
|
|
|
|
* Python
|
|
|
|
In Python, we can test this via a =language_containment_checker=
|
|
object:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results output :exports both
|
|
import spot
|
|
f = spot.formula("(a U b) U a")
|
|
g = spot.formula("b U a")
|
|
c = spot.language_containment_checker()
|
|
print("Equivalent" if c.equal(f, g) else "Not equivalent")
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
The equivalence check is done by converting the formulas $f$ and $g$
|
|
and their negation into four automata $A_f$, $A_{\lnot f}$, $A_g$, and
|
|
$A_{\lnot g}$, and then making sure that $A_f\otimes A_{\lnot g}$ and
|
|
$A_g\otimes A_{\lnot f}$ are empty.
|
|
|
|
We could also write this check by doing [[file:tut10.org][the translation]] and emptiness
|
|
check ourselves. For instance:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results output :exports both
|
|
import spot
|
|
|
|
def implies(f, g):
|
|
a_f = f.translate()
|
|
a_ng = spot.formula_Not(g).translate()
|
|
return spot.product(a_f, a_ng).is_empty()
|
|
|
|
def equiv(f, g):
|
|
return implies(f, g) and implies(g, f)
|
|
|
|
f = spot.formula("(a U b) U a")
|
|
g = spot.formula("b U a")
|
|
print("Equivalent" if equiv(f, g) else "Not equivalent")
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
The =language_containment_checker= object essentially performs the
|
|
same work, but it also implements a cache to avoid translating the
|
|
same formulas multiple times when it is used to test multiple
|
|
equivalences.
|
|
|
|
* C++
|
|
|
|
Here is a C++ translation of the first Python example.
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC C++ :results verbatim :exports both
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
#include <spot/tl/parse.hh>
|
|
#include <spot/tl/contain.hh>
|
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
{
|
|
spot::formula f = spot::parse_formula("(a U b) U a");
|
|
spot::formula g = spot::parse_formula("b U a");
|
|
spot::language_containment_checker c;
|
|
std::cout << (c.equal(f, g) ? "Equivalent\n" : "Not equivalent\n");
|
|
}
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|