This feature is in Org 9, which is already required. * doc/org/autcross.org, doc/org/autfilt.org, doc/org/compile.org, doc/org/concepts.org, doc/org/csv.org, doc/org/dstar2tgba.org, doc/org/genaut.org, doc/org/genltl.org, doc/org/hierarchy.org, doc/org/hoa.org, doc/org/ioltl.org, doc/org/ltl2tgba.org, doc/org/ltl2tgta.org, doc/org/ltlcross.org, doc/org/ltldo.org, doc/org/ltlfilt.org, doc/org/ltlgrind.org, doc/org/ltlsynt.org, doc/org/oaut.org, doc/org/randaut.org, doc/org/randltl.org, doc/org/satmin.org, doc/org/setup.org, doc/org/tools.org, doc/org/tut01.org, doc/org/tut02.org, doc/org/tut03.org, doc/org/tut04.org, doc/org/tut10.org, doc/org/tut11.org, doc/org/tut12.org, doc/org/tut20.org, doc/org/tut21.org, doc/org/tut22.org, doc/org/tut23.org, doc/org/tut24.org, doc/org/tut30.org, doc/org/tut31.org, doc/org/tut50.org, doc/org/upgrade2.org: Simplify SRC block setups for sh, python and C++. Also fix a few typos and examples along the way.
134 lines
3.7 KiB
Org Mode
134 lines
3.7 KiB
Org Mode
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
#+TITLE: Testing the equivalence of two formulas
|
|
#+DESCRIPTION: Code example for testing the equivalence of two LTL or PSL formulas
|
|
#+INCLUDE: setup.org
|
|
#+HTML_LINK_UP: tut.html
|
|
#+PROPERTY: header-args:sh :results verbatim :exports both
|
|
#+PROPERTY: header-args:python :results output :exports both
|
|
#+PROPERTY: header-args:C+++ :results verbatim :exports both
|
|
|
|
This page shows how to test whether two LTL/PSL formulas are
|
|
equivalent, i.e., if they denote the same languages.
|
|
|
|
* Shell
|
|
|
|
Using a =ltlfilt= you can use =--equivalent-to=f= to filter a list of
|
|
LTL formula and retain only those equivalent to =f=. So this gives an easy
|
|
way to test the equivalence of two formulas:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC sh
|
|
ltlfilt -f '(a U b) U a' --equivalent-to 'b U a'
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: (a U b) U a
|
|
|
|
Since the input formula was output, it means it is equivalent to =b U
|
|
a=. You may want to add =-c= to count the number of formula output if
|
|
you prefer a 1/0 answer:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC sh
|
|
ltlfilt -c -f '(a U b) U a' --equivalent-to 'b U a'
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: 1
|
|
|
|
Or use =-q= if you only care about the exit status of =ltlfilt=: the
|
|
exist status is =0= if some formula matched, and =1= if no formula
|
|
matched. (The effect of these =-c= and =-q= options should be
|
|
familiar to =grep= users.)
|
|
|
|
* Python
|
|
|
|
In Python, we can implement this in a number of ways. The
|
|
easiest is to use the =spot.are_equivalent()= function.
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results output :exports both
|
|
import spot
|
|
are_eq = spot.are_equivalent("(a U b) U a", "b U a")
|
|
print("Equivalent" if are_eq else "Not equivalent")
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
The equivalence check is done by converting the input formulas $f$ and
|
|
$g$ and their negation into four automata $A_f$, $A_{\lnot f}$, $A_g$,
|
|
and $A_{\lnot g}$, and then making sure that $A_f\otimes A_{\lnot g}$
|
|
and $A_g\otimes A_{\lnot f}$ are empty.
|
|
|
|
We could also write this check by doing [[file:tut10.org][the translation]] and emptiness
|
|
check ourselves. For instance:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC python
|
|
import spot
|
|
|
|
def implies(f, g):
|
|
a_f = f.translate()
|
|
a_ng = spot.formula.Not(g).translate()
|
|
return spot.product(a_f, a_ng).is_empty()
|
|
|
|
def equiv(f, g):
|
|
return implies(f, g) and implies(g, f)
|
|
|
|
f = spot.formula("(a U b) U a")
|
|
g = spot.formula("b U a")
|
|
print("Equivalent" if equiv(f, g) else "Not equivalent")
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
This can also be done via a =language_containment_checker= object:
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC python
|
|
import spot
|
|
f = spot.formula("(a U b) U a")
|
|
g = spot.formula("b U a")
|
|
c = spot.language_containment_checker()
|
|
print("Equivalent" if c.equal(f, g) else "Not equivalent")
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
The =language_containment_checker= object essentially performs the
|
|
same work, but it also implements a cache to avoid translating the
|
|
same formulas multiple times when it is used to test multiple
|
|
equivalences.
|
|
|
|
* C++
|
|
|
|
Here are possible C++ implementations using either =are_equivalent()=
|
|
or the =language_containment_checker=. Note that the
|
|
=are_equivalent()= function also work with automata.
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC C++
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
#include <spot/tl/parse.hh>
|
|
#include <spot/twaalgos/contains.hh>
|
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
{
|
|
spot::formula f = spot::parse_formula("(a U b) U a");
|
|
spot::formula g = spot::parse_formula("b U a");
|
|
std::cout << (spot::are_equivalent(f, g) ?
|
|
"Equivalent\n" : "Not equivalent\n");
|
|
}
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|
|
|
|
#+BEGIN_SRC C++
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
#include <spot/tl/parse.hh>
|
|
#include <spot/tl/contain.hh>
|
|
|
|
int main()
|
|
{
|
|
spot::formula f = spot::parse_formula("(a U b) U a");
|
|
spot::formula g = spot::parse_formula("b U a");
|
|
spot::language_containment_checker c;
|
|
std::cout << (c.equal(f, g) ? "Equivalent\n" : "Not equivalent\n");
|
|
}
|
|
#+END_SRC
|
|
|
|
#+RESULTS:
|
|
: Equivalent
|